[_ Old Earth _] Creation and the myth of Evolution

[John]

:

 

[jwu]

Does it contain any interesting points which you wish to discuss here?

 

[John]

Does it contain any interesting points which you wish to discuss here?

the original title was "evolution and the myth of creation" i just photo shopped it.

 

[jwu]

There is a typo in it ;)

 

[John]

There is a typo in it ;)

AHHH lmfao i mad e it at like 3 in the morning. after i cam back from work : : :

 

[Dunzo]

How embarrassing|! The typo just says it all, doesn't it?

 

[Malachi45]

Well, Creation was recorded 5000 years ago, and Evolution was developed as a theory about 100 years ago. Mmmmm, I wonder how all the theory in the world still hasn't explained why all these extinct dinosaurs still turn up alive and well, and no different to the fossilised remain found in 450 million year old supposedly sandstone.

I remember seeing a photo of a fossilized tree, standing upright through a 450, 350, 250, and 150 million year old sandstone layer, and interesting to note that the same sort of tree is still in existence. Maybe the layers were the 20 day, 30 day, and the 40th day of rain during the Great Flood. and the tree was floating upright, and as the silt settled it covered the tree in the different size granules of sand and silt.

Oh, by the way, you should read the finds found in coal seams at all different locations of the world, you will be amazed what is found that evolutionists push into file 13 and pretend that they don't exist, such as live frogs at 800 ft levels in coal mines, and modern iron pots, crockery, and granite walls.

I can remember reading an article on a marble mine in Italy, which was complete fossilsed sea bed creatures, and was claimed to be 450 million years old, but after all the marble was extracted, a chalk pit was found below it, and as they extracted the chalk, there were fossilesed remain of a rhino, but rhinos were suppose to appear over 200 million years later. Then how did they get there? Evolutionists never answered that question either.

 

[Heidi]

Well, Creation was recorded 5000 years ago, and Evolution was developed as a theory about 100 years ago. Mmmmm, I wonder how all the theory in the world still hasn't explained why all these extinct dinosaurs still turn up alive and well, and no different to the fossilised remain found in 450 million year old supposedly sandstone.

I remember seeing a photo of a fossilized tree, standing upright through a 450, 350, 250, and 150 million year old sandstone layer, and interesting to note that the same sort of tree is still in existence. Maybe the layers were the 20 day, 30 day, and the 40th day of rain during the Great Flood. and the tree was floating upright, and as the silt settled it covered the tree in the different size granules of sand and silt.

Oh, by the way, you should read the finds found in coal seams at all different locations of the world, you will be amazed what is found that evolutionists push into file 13 and pretend that they don't exist, such as live frogs at 800 ft levels in coal mines, and modern iron pots, crockery, and granite walls.

I can remember reading an article on a marble mine in Italy, which was complete fossilsed sea bed creatures, and was claimed to be 450 million years old, but after all the marble was extracted, a chalk pit was found below it, and as they extracted the chalk, there were fossilesed remain of a rhino, but rhinos were suppose to appear over 200 million years later. Then how did they get there? Evolutionists never answered that question either.

And of course there's no one in history who can verify billions of years of history any more than there are accounts of anyone in history talking about our vine-swinging ancestors. : So evolution can't be backed up by any historical documents either. It's just a made up fairy tale as voluminous both in length and scope of the imagination as "Lord of the Rings." The only difference is that at least Tolken was in touch with reality enough to know that his story was fiction. ;-)

 

[Dunzo]

Oh Heidi, how I missed your incoherent ramblings!

 

[Heidi]

Oh Heidi, how I missed your incoherent ramblings!

Personal attacks are the first sign that one cannot defend his position. So my post stands as true since you cannot refute it. ;-)

 

[Dunzo]

So you've learned... nothing during your break from the Science forum? Your logic is flawed.

 

[freeway]

Oh Heidi, how I missed your incoherent ramblings!

oh how dunzo of you.. to attack someone that does not agree with you..
I"ve read alot of Heidi"s post, and quite frankly, whats the problem? sound like another Christian that loves the Lord... :-D

 

[Heidi]

So you've learned... nothing during your break from the Science forum? Your logic is flawed.

Oh really? Then explain what part of my logic is flawed and why. Otherwise, again, my post stands as true.

 

[Malachi45]

Maybe someone might try to explain Job 40 and 41, after all the dinosaurs where roaming the world, the same as lions and all other animals that can only be found in Africa now. As I said that many of our local indigneous people have many stories that confirm that dinosaurs where roaming with their ancestors, and it has nothing to do with descending from the apes.

 

[jwu]

Dragon myths?

Either way, how come we don't find any dinosaur bones in recent strata then?

 

[Heidi]

Dragon myths?

Either way, how come we don't find any dinosaur bones in recent strata then?

Sorry but since scientists throw out the flood, then it's impossible to date anything before the flood since they refuse to take into consideration how millions of gallons of water affects the carbon on every object it floods. ;-) So the very oldest strata could just have easily been 3-6,000 years ago. ;-)

There's no reason to throw out the flood since evidence for a global flood can be documented by over 200 ancient cultures and the sedimentary rock all over the world in which all fossils are found. Only water can solidify objects and bones into rock. But just because the Flood is described in the bible, it's thrown out and instead, replaced with a global ice age of which no one in history ever recounted. So once again, scientists are in the business of making up stories that can't be documented by anyone in history, all to disprove the bible. Well sorry, but ignoring evidence isn't scientific any more than inventing stories that can't be documented is. :wink:

 

[Dunzo]

So you've learned... nothing during your break from the Science forum? Your logic is flawed.

Oh really? Then explain what part of my logic is flawed and why. Otherwise, again, my post stands as true.

Your claim isn't automatically true if I don't refute it.
As a basic example, let's say I claim that 2+2=5. If you don't refute it, does that mean it's true?

 

[Malachi45]

Dragon myths?

Either way, how come we don't find any dinosaur bones in recent strata then?

What do you call RECENT STRATA, after all the dinosaurs were drowned in the Great Flood, and where covered over quickly. Now those fossils are in recent structure that was laid down during the Great Flood.

 

[Heidi]

So you've learned... nothing during your break from the Science forum? Your logic is flawed.

Oh really? Then explain what part of my logic is flawed and why. Otherwise, again, my post stands as true.

Your claim isn't automatically true if I don't refute it.
As a basic example, let's say I claim that 2+2=5. If you don't refute it, does that mean it's true?

If my logic is flawed, then it shouldn't be hard at all to refute it. It s not hard for me to refute the posts of unbelievers so I don't need to personally attack them. I just discuss issues. So sorry, but simply claiming that my ramblings are incoherent and my logic is flawed is nothing but a personal attack and slander if you don't back them up with facts. But that's what unbelievers do to Jesus so it's no surprise. So unless you can refrain from personal attacks and simply discuss issues, then I don't consider it productive to engage in verbal volleyball.

 

[freeway]

The way I see it is that evolution needs the millions of years for theory to work without those million/billions of years, evolution falls flat. there is to many thing in this world that point to younger earth 6 to 10 thousands years give or take. As heide has said scientist throw out the flood so naturally they want to try to find any thing that will back their agenda. So they come up with this huge age gape. Because no one has a time machine to go back and see first hand. Each year or so the evolution think tank comes up with a new missing link, that turn out to no missing link "because there is non"

to inquire from the evolution group? I like to quote: "Malachi45"

Well, Creation was recorded 5000 years ago, and Evolution was developed as a theory about 100 years ago. Mmmm, I wonder how all the theory in the world still hasn't explained why all these extinct dinosaurs still turn up alive and well, and no different to the fossilised remain found in 450 million year old supposedly sandstone.

I remember seeing a photo of a fossilized tree, standing upright through a 450, 350, 250, and 150 million year old sandstone layer, and interesting to note that the same sort of tree is still in existence. Maybe the layers were the 20 day, 30 day, and the 40th day of rain during the Great Flood. and the tree was floating upright, and as the silt settled it covered the tree in the different size granules of sand and silt.

Oh, by the way, you should read the finds found in coal seams at all different locations of the world, you will be amazed what is found that evolutionists push into file 13 and pretend that they don't exist, such as live frogs at 800 ft levels in coal mines, and modern iron pots, crockery, and granite walls.

I can remember reading an article on a marble mine in Italy, which was complete fossilized sea bed creatures, and was claimed to be 450 million years old, but after all the marble was extracted, a chalk pit was found below it, and as they extracted the chalk, there were fossilized remain of a rhino, but rhinos were suppose to appear over 200 million years later. Then how did they get there? Evolutionists never answered that question either

Also the Grand Canyon, Niagara Falls, salt in the oceans, mountain from billions of years of rain and weather they should be almost gone if not gone by now. There is some much more that evolutionist tries to hind under the umbrella of evolution and billions of year theory..