[_ Old Earth _] Cro-Magon Man

[John]

The fossil identified as Cro-Magon Man is is indistinguishable from modern man. The sole reason evolutionists suppose the fossil was that of a primitive ape-man was that it was found near a series of cave drawings that were considered primitive. This identification as a ape-man is no longer supported by modern scientists, and Cro-Magon Man in no longer considered as a primitive ancestor of modern man.

 

[jwu]

The fossil identified as Cro-Magon Man is is indistinguishable from modern man.

That's plain wrong.The left is a cro magnon skull, the right one a modern human. These are easily distinguishable:

(cropped from TalkOrigins skull picture. The original: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc ... s2_big.jpg)

The sole reason evolutionists suppose the fossil was that of a primitive ape-man was that it was found near a series of cave drawings that were considered primitive. This identification as a ape-man is no longer supported by modern scientists, and Cro-Magon Man in no longer considered as a primitive ancestor of modern man.

Reference please.

 

[John]

Creation: Remarkable evidence of God's design. By Dr. Grant R. Jeffery Pg 211

thats were it came from.

 

[jwu]

Do you agree that modern human and cro-magnon skulls are not "indistinguishable" at all?

If yes, then it appears that Dr. Jeffrey either had no clue what he was talking about, or that he was plain lying to you, doesn't it?

 

[Deep Thought]

Looking forward to John's response to your question jwu.

 

[John]

Do you agree that modern human and cro-magnon skulls are not "indistinguishable" at all?

If yes, then it appears that Dr. Jeffrey either had no clue what he was talking about, or that he was plain lying to you, doesn't it?

You have no clue of the history of that skull, it very well could be a man, despite the differences, or it could be an primate type creature, maybe Bigfoot LMFAO...jk

There is no way in this world that a scientist can tell me all about a ancient fossil when they interpret the unknown.

i could say this skull came from mars where humans have evolved to the point of being able to visit other planets and it dies here, you have no way of knowing.

i am still waiting for an example of a skeleton with no eye sockets, the flatfish example, while it did have some freaky weird eyes...it still had eye sockets.

with all your evolutionary predictions..tell me whats next to be found ?

 

[jwu]

Do you agree that modern human and cro-magnon skulls are not "indistinguishable" at all?

If yes, then it appears that Dr. Jeffrey either had no clue what he was talking about, or that he was plain lying to you, doesn't it?

You have no clue of the history of that skull, it very well could be a man, despite the differences, or it could be an primate type creature, maybe Bigfoot LMFAO...jk

There is no way in this world that a scientist can tell me all about a ancient fossil when they interpret the unknown.

i could say this skull came from mars where humans have evolved to the point of being able to visit other planets and it dies here, you have no way of knowing.

That doesn't matter at all, does it? Regardless of the history of this skull, it clearly is not indistinguishable from modern humans. Hence your source either didn't do its homework or was lying to you. Regardless of which option you choose, you should begin to question things that this Dr. Jeffrey tells you. Do you?

i am still waiting for an example of a skeleton with no eye sockets, the flatfish example, while it did have some freaky weird eyes...it still had eye sockets.

with all your evolutionary predictions..tell me whats next to be found ?

That's a matter for a different thread. This one is about cro-magnon man.

 

[John]

yes i guestion everything.