John Stefanyszyn
Member
- Mar 19, 2011
- 21
- 0
This subject is for the Christian lawyers who have had to defend a Christian church's doctrine or belief in the court of law.
What arguement did the lawyer use to win the case for the church that was represented?
A) Did the lawyer defend the case by claiming that the belief in question was given by the One and Only True God, the Creator, and that, therefore, it is the absolute undisputable truth?
B) Did the lawyer defend the case by claiming that the belief in question is a doctrine of this church's religion and that, as a religion, its right of expression is protected by the constituion of freedom of rights and freedom of religion?
As man does not recognize that the Father of Jesus Christ is the One and Only God, it is most obvious that the lawyers defended the word of God as a "religion" in order to win the case. What happened when they did this?
A religion amongst other religions? A god amongst other gods? This is blasphemy as per the first three commandments in the Old Testament and as per the First Commandment that Christ gave...to love the Father, and Only Him, with all of our heart mind, soul, and strength.
Man's choice to embrace the belief in freedom of religion makes the True God into a 'religion" among religions. Christ never did this and neither did the prophets, apostles, and disciples. They all stood up for God as the One and Only True God, Creator, and Father.
When Christ returns as King of kings, there will no longer be the belief in the freedom of religion as there is Only One reality and Truth.
Let us not be deceived by this false belief. Let us not feel comfortable and protected by it. Let us not fall asleep but wake up and see what is happening. Let us not accept the belief that says that Our Father is a "religion".
To love God, and Only Him, and to love our neighbor.
What arguement did the lawyer use to win the case for the church that was represented?
A) Did the lawyer defend the case by claiming that the belief in question was given by the One and Only True God, the Creator, and that, therefore, it is the absolute undisputable truth?
B) Did the lawyer defend the case by claiming that the belief in question is a doctrine of this church's religion and that, as a religion, its right of expression is protected by the constituion of freedom of rights and freedom of religion?
As man does not recognize that the Father of Jesus Christ is the One and Only God, it is most obvious that the lawyers defended the word of God as a "religion" in order to win the case. What happened when they did this?
A religion amongst other religions? A god amongst other gods? This is blasphemy as per the first three commandments in the Old Testament and as per the First Commandment that Christ gave...to love the Father, and Only Him, with all of our heart mind, soul, and strength.
Man's choice to embrace the belief in freedom of religion makes the True God into a 'religion" among religions. Christ never did this and neither did the prophets, apostles, and disciples. They all stood up for God as the One and Only True God, Creator, and Father.
When Christ returns as King of kings, there will no longer be the belief in the freedom of religion as there is Only One reality and Truth.
Let us not be deceived by this false belief. Let us not feel comfortable and protected by it. Let us not fall asleep but wake up and see what is happening. Let us not accept the belief that says that Our Father is a "religion".
To love God, and Only Him, and to love our neighbor.