The Gospel of Jesus Christ carries a command.
That command is repent. Repent means to turn to God (in submission to Jesus Christ as LORD).
That command requires obedience. The way we obey the Gospel is to confess Jesus Christ as LORD.
Obeying the Gospel is required for salvation. Obeying the Gospel is an eternal commitment to submit to, and obey Jesus Christ as LORD.
But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “LORD, who has believed our report?” So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Romans 10:16-17
... in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Thessalonians 1:8
JLB
Tyndale, unlike Wycliffe, helped us avoid Sabellianism by his full capitalisation as [the LORD] in the OT, so made a definite gain. Coverdale hadn’t a clue and both God’s name & lordship title got the same full caps, obliterating the distinction. For the NT OT quotations, the NKJV has some justification re. full caps (eg Rm.10:16): I’m a floating voter.
But there is a connect and disconnect between Yahweh & Yeshua which is important
not to obliterate. If we go Tyndale’s way, then [submission to Jesus Christ as LORD] means [as Yahweh]. I suspect that few of the early Christians made that nuanced link (centuries of creed-making support my suspicion), the humbler ὁ κυριον (the lord) was I think their starter point, and κυριε in Rm.10:16 meant Yahweh not Yeshua. Now that aside, such commands as you raised are in line with my [life with Christ premortem] reply. As said, the wordgroup
salvation/
saved is wide and undefined in your poll. For
Christian salvation (which did not predate Christ) we need the message of Christ (ῥηματος χριστου: Rm.10:17). Hence my No.
2 Ths.1:8 (in context, eg v6) suggests to me those who were attacking Christians not simply because the attackers were not obeying the gospel (Saul had not obeyed the gospel of God’s son), but because at core they actively did not
know God (Saul had known God)—core wilful blindness. I deem that at core humanity divides vis-à-vis knowing God, between heart knowledge or heart blindness. Cornelius had known God before he obeyed the gospel of God’s son, and I agree with Calvin that had Cornelius died before hearing the evangel, he would have everlasting life postmortem. In this situational letter, Paul’s line in 2 Ths.1:8 contrasts two extremes, ignoring for his point the middle.
On 2 Ths.1:8 I accept that Paul bespoke (
contra Universalism) a postmortem everlasting separation between two groups, who neither know God nor obey his son: ie the core value anti-God extremists. Vis-à-vis
everlasting life with God (possible for Orpah and Ruth if Naomi got it right), people can be saved before they hear and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ. Hence my Yes.
John Wesley made a similar distinction. He assumed that those who never heard the gospel might well have life with God postmortem (his Yes to you poll), by focused on his mission to get folk saved into Christ’s kingdom in the there and then (his No to your poll).