Is Open Theism a False Teaching?

[Solo]

After reading the following article, and researching the teaching of Open Theism, answer the Poll question and give any incite.

What is Open Theism?

Open theism, also called openness and the open view, is a theological position dealing with human free will and its relationship to God and the nature of the future. It is the teaching that God has granted to humanity free will and that in order for the free will to be truly free, the future free will choices of individuals cannot be known ahead of time by God. They hold that if God knows what we are going to choose, then how can we be truly free when it is time to make those choices since a counter choice cannot then be made by us because it is already "known" what we are going to do.1 In other words, we would not actually be able to make a contrary choice to what God "knows" we will choose thus implying that we would not then be free.
In open theism, the future is either knowable or not knowable. For the open theists who hold that the future is knowable by God, they maintain that God voluntarily limits His knowledge of free will choices so that they can remain truly free.2 Other open theists maintain that the future, being non existent, is not knowable, even by God.3 Gregory Boyd, a well know advocate of Open Theism says,

• "Much of it [the future], open theists will concede, is settled ahead of time, either by God's predestining will or by existing earthly causes, but it is not exhaustively settled ahead of time. To whatever degree the future is yet open to be decided by free agents, it is unsettled."4

But open theists would not say that God is weak or powerless. They say that God is capable of predicting and ordaining certain future events because He is capable of working in the world and bringing certain events to pass when the time is needed. Therefore, God could inspire the Old Testament writers to prophecy certain events and then He could simply ensure that those events occur at the right time.
Furthermore, open theists claim that they do not deny the omniscience of God. They, like classical theologians, state that God is indeed all knowing. But the differ in that the God can only know that which is knowable and since the future has not yet happened, it can not be exhaustively known by God. Instead, God only knows the present exhaustively, including the inclinations, desires, thoughts, and hopes of all people.
In open theism God can make mistakes because He does not know all things that will occur in the future. According to them God also takes risks and adapts to the free will choices of people. They claim biblical support for their position by citing scripture where God changes His mind (Exodus 32:14), is surprised (Isaiah 5:3–7), and tests people to see what they will do (Genesis 22:12).
Finally, open theism tends to portray the God of orthodoxy as distant, controlling, and unyielding while promoting the God of openness as involved, adapting, loving, interacting, and caring for humanity.

Orthodox Christianity

Historic Orthodox Christianity states that God knows all things, even the entirety of the future, exhaustively. 1 John 3:20 it says, "...for God is greater than our heart, and knows all things." Likewise, Peter said to Jesus in John 21:17, "...You know all things; You know that I love You..." God's sovereignty is clearly taught in scripture and His sovereignty is tied to His omniscience. Orthodox Christianity teaches that God is very loving, very involved, and even condescends to our level and interacts with us in a manner that we can understand. This means that we will see what appears to be instances of God changing His mind, testing, and adapting. But, this is all due to God's working with creatures who have limited vision, short life spans, and are sinners. God must work on our level since we cannot work on His.

God and time

The question about God's knowledge of the future is very important because it deals with the actual definition of God's nature in relation to the nature of the future. Is God all knowing about the future or not? Is God existing in the future or not? Is God limited to the present or not? The answers to these questions reflect the very nature and scope of God's existence. The open theists are pushing a description of God that reduces God from knowing all things, past, present, and future, to not knowing all things in the future. God's omnipresence is also in jeopardy in open theism, since some open theists deny the existence of the future and thereby deny the omnipresence of God in the future.

Conclusion

My opinion is that openness is a dangerous teaching that undermines the sovereignty, majesty, infinitude, knowledge, existence, and glory of God and exalts the nature and condition of man's own free will. Though the open theists will undoubtedly say it does no such thing, it goes without saying that the God of open theism is not as knowledgeable or as ever present as the God of orthodoxy.

Books and Websites Consulted.

• 1. For Open Theism[list:abda5]
  A. Books[list:abda5]i. Boyd, Gregory A., God of the possible, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books), 2001.
  
  ii. Pinnock, Clark, et. al., The Openness of God, (Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press), 1994.
  
  iii. Sanders, John, The God who Risks, (Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press), 1998.

B. Websites[/list:u:abda5]

• [list:abda5]i. http://www.gregboyd.org

[/list:u:abda5][/list:u:abda5]

• 2. Against Open Theism
  [list:abda5]
  A. Books[list:abda5]i. Frame, John, No Other God, a response to Open Theism, (Phillipsburg, New Jersey: P & R Publishing), 2001.
  
  ii. Ware, Bruce A., God's Lesser Glory: The diminished God of Open Theism, (Crossway Books), 2001

B. Websites[/list:u:abda5]

• [list:abda5]i. http://www.antithesis.com/index.html
  
  ii. http://www.founders.org/FJ46/article2_fr.html

[/list:u:abda5][/list:u:abda5]
_____________
1. For more on this, please see If God knows our free will choices, do we still have free will?
2. For more on this, please see God chooses to not know the future free-will choices of human creatures.
3. For an attempt at a logical refutation of this position, please see A logical refutation of open theism.
4. Boyd, Gregory A., God of the possible, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books), 2001. p. 15
5. ibid., p. 24

 

[Drew]

I am quite symptathetic towards open theism and, while not 100% sure, I tend to believe that God either voluntarily limits his knowledge of the future, or, that the future is not an object of possible knowledge, even for God.

There is one aspect of the OP definition of open theism that I do not agree with - I do not think that if God foreknows all, this robs us of free will. The argument in support of the harmony of foreknowledge and free will is complex and out of scope. However, even if God could know the future as fully settled, this does not mean that he, in fact, does. My reasons for being sympathetic to open theism are scriptural - I think that specific texts showing God as showing regret, making contingent plans, changing his mind etc. are very compelling. I also think there is a possibility that, as the OP suggests, "the future" may not be a possible object of knowledge, even for God.

I think that one reason why many reject open theism is that we cannot imagine how God could accomplish his purposes without knowing the future exhaustively. I suggest that this might reflect a lack of imagination and appreciation for the subtlely of God. I see no in principle reason why an all-wise (not all-knowing) God could not accomplish his purposes even though he does not the future as exhaustively settled. I think we sell God short if we imagine that his wisdom is so limited that he needs to see all things in advance in order to accomplish his purposes.