Mankind Divided Into Two Groups

[Elijah674]

The sons of God verse of Genesis 6 has been botched up in 'History' (See the Ecclesiastes 1:9-10 & Ecclesiastes 3:15) in many different ways. Ancient Jewish commentators, and early church fathers (Revelation 17:5) and today's Jude 1:12 'wind' ones have these 'sons' to be angels many times. Comparing them with Job 1:6, Job 2:1 & Job 38:7. One needs to remember that God spoke directly to His OWN up until shortly after the Ten Commandments were given.

But, this is not the Everlasting Gospel! (Revelation 14:6) Notice Genesis 6:2-4 'That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives of all which they chose. (even more than one, huh! wives.) And verse 3 tell of the death by flood. These ones were not human angels stuff! The Striving of the Holy Spirit had long gone been over for them of heavens rebellion. And also was soon to be over for even Seth's 'ex/son's of God' apostates! And these ones were to die by the flood. (and how does one drown angels??)

Verse 4 says: There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the [sons of God came in unto the daughters of men], and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.'

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels. (there time will come after the 1000 years of Revelation 20:1-3 are up!) And Christ has documented that angels do not marry in Matthew 22:30. Ask yourself, when God asks us to come and reason together, who would benefit by this satanic teaching, Christ or the devil? Christ is immortal and there has never been a time that He was not Christ/God of the Godhead! (and satan is a created being for just a short time more. Obadiah 1:16)

No. Adam was a created Son of God, and a Born Again son of God by faith in the Genesis 3:15 Everlasting Gospel. It was CONDITIONAL! And as one can see that Cain was saved by faith until he did the devils thing in full mature 'sin against the Holy Ghost'.. in rejection. (See Genesis 4:7) At this moment the devil has his first convert! This is the first son of man. If one follows on, we see that Seth did not come on the scene until approximately 120 years later as the Son of God. Also take note of Exodus 4:22 & Deuteronomy 14:22 where Moses called the children of Israel as 'His first born son' & 'Children of the Lord your God'.

These others were the ones who disobeyed God that were from the lineage of Seth and became the sons of men. (lost ones) See Deuteronomy 7:3-4, Joshua 23:12, Ezra 9:2 & what is new?? See 2 Corinthians 6:14-15! Yet, they still held near physical perfection! Length of day, height, I.Q. and ON! Sin decays, yet, not ALL at once.

One more thought on the execution of 'mankind' by a flood. 'I will destroy man' Genesis 6:7
The Hebrew expression means literally 'I will wipe off' or 'blot out' or 'erase' (see Exodus 32:32-33, Isaiah 43:25) Surely the flood did this to all of mankind who were not inside the ark! And notice that the antediluvians Christ has compared to His human race at the [end of time]! Matthew 24:37-39

And the giant thing? Well, most before the flood lived around a thousand year period of time. Books were not even needed much surely, for everything could be passed along from the aged, to far into his descendents. Even today, we do not see the total death of mankind's physical & mental capacities that God created them with. But when one reads some of these forums threads, sometime I wonder? (and no, many do not give the credits to God)

Giants on the earth. Genesis 6:4 'There were giants on the earth in those days: and after that, when the [sons of God] came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.'
OK: Notice first that these were son's of God. His creation which were from the start, that were obedient. When Adam was created God pronounced that he was not good, but Very Good! (PERFECT!) Think what that means? His memory was flaw/less. No need of books! Everything was perfectly remembered. And yes, after sin, these ones 'decayed' (sin does that) much less & slowly than that of the sons of men who followed Cain's (satan) rebellion on earth. Now when one thinks of these two groups with one following God & one following satan's first convert Cain, ask yourself the question of the height of man? Which of the two groups are blessed of God, and which of the two would die the quicker without God's Blessing them? And how tall was Adam when created? The Word of God just stated that there were giants on earth 'in those days: and after that'! But not all, huh? Why?? We will get to that. (and if not? diet had and has, a lot to do with life)

Now notice that it continues on with 'When the sons of God came unto the daughter of men'. And notice that the thought is still being the sons [of God] and the descendants of satan's convert Cain as.. 'daughters of men'. Got that?
We do remember that God did not want this to happen! (the yoke of God with the bondage o f satan) 1 Corinthians 6:14-18 & the REASON WHY as seen in Deuteronomy 7:3-4. Yet, that is exactly what happened over & over again. If you do not think so, then why do we see this 'post' of needing to tell these ones here, that their thinking is woven in with the 'son's of men mentality'?

But, lets continue on? Seth (Adams son of God) obeyed God until his descendents began starting to apostasies. And even then the children still carried on the giant 'strengths' that God gave unto them in Obedience, be it mental genius, or physical strength, + giant structure. But surely, God 's PERFECT Creation were [all] this way when created! Sin deteriorates . Notice the life span of the pre/flood ones as compared to after the flood! See Genesis 9:5
Again notice the two groups of Gods creation above, both seen with free ones choice, to Obey God or to obey satan.

But what about angels?
Do you see angels? (God can & has used angels in bodily form) Yet, He tells us that they are.. Hebrews 1:7 'And of the angels He saith, Who maketh His angels spirits,..' And in Psalm 104:4 the Word of God says again.. 'Who maketh his angels spirits; ..' And we did notice that the Genesis 6:3 verse said that it was the sons of God that came to the daughter of men and it was they who 'bare children to them'. (women angels? Hardly!) And surely Christ's Word Tel's us flat out that angels do not.. 'marry or give in marriage' Matthew 22:28-30

---Elijah

 

[Prince]

The sons of God verse of Genesis 6 has been botched up in 'History' (See the Ecclesiastes 1:9-10 & Ecclesiastes 3:15) in many different ways. Ancient Jewish commentators, and early church fathers (Revelation 17:5) and today's Jude 1:12 'wind' ones have these 'sons' to be angels many times. Comparing them with Job 1:6, Job 2:1 & Job 38:7. One needs to remember that God spoke directly to His OWN up until shortly after the Ten Commandments were given.


Verse 4 says: There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the [sons of God came in unto the daughters of men], and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.'

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels. (there time will come after the 1000 years of Revelation 20:1-3 are up!) And Christ has documented that angels do not marry in Matthew 22:30. Ask yourself, when God asks us to come and reason together, who would benefit by this satanic teaching, Christ or the devil? Christ is immortal and there has never been a time that He was not Christ/God of the Godhead! (and satan is a created being for just a short time more. Obadiah 1:16)

No. Adam was a created Son of God, and a Born Again son of God by faith in the Genesis 3:15 Everlasting Gospel. It was CONDITIONAL! And as one can see that Cain was saved by faith until he did the devils thing in full mature 'sin against the Holy Ghost'.. in rejection. (See Genesis 4:7) At this moment the devil has his first convert! This is the first son of man. If one follows on, we see that Seth did not come on the scene until approximately 120 years later as the Son of God. Also take note of Exodus 4:22 & Deuteronomy 14:22 where Moses called the children of Israel as 'His first born son' & 'Children of the Lord your God'.

These others were the ones who disobeyed God that were from the lineage of Seth and became the sons of men. (lost ones) See Deuteronomy 7:3-4, Joshua 23:12, Ezra 9:2 & what is new?? See 2 Corinthians 6:14-15! Yet, they still held near physical perfection! Length of day, height, I.Q. and ON! Sin decays, yet, not ALL at once.

One more thought on the execution of 'mankind' by a flood. 'I will destroy man' Genesis 6:7
The Hebrew expression means literally 'I will wipe off' or 'blot out' or 'erase' (see Exodus 32:32-33, Isaiah 43:25) Surely the flood did this to all of mankind who were not inside the ark! And notice that the antediluvians Christ has compared to His human race at the [end of time]! Matthew 24:37-39

And the giant thing? Well, most before the flood lived around a thousand year period of time. Books were not even needed much surely, for everything could be passed along from the aged, to far into his descendents. Even today, we do not see the total death of mankind's physical & mental capacities that God created them with. But when one reads some of these forums threads, sometime I wonder? (and no, many do not give the credits to God)

Giants on the earth. Genesis 6:4 'There were giants on the earth in those days: and after that, when the [sons of God] came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.'
OK: Notice first that these were son's of God. His creation which were from the start, that were obedient. When Adam was created God pronounced that he was not good, but Very Good! (PERFECT!) Think what that means? His memory was flaw/less. No need of books! Everything was perfectly remembered. And yes, after sin, these ones 'decayed' (sin does that) much less & slowly than that of the sons of men who followed Cain's (satan) rebellion on earth. Now when one thinks of these two groups with one following God & one following satan's first convert Cain, ask yourself the question of the height of man? Which of the two groups are blessed of God, and which of the two would die the quicker without God's Blessing them? And how tall was Adam when created? The Word of God just stated that there were giants on earth 'in those days: and after that'! But not all, huh? Why?? We will get to that. (and if not? diet had and has, a lot to do with life)

Now notice that it continues on with 'When the sons of God came unto the daughter of men'. And notice that the thought is still being the sons [of God] and the descendants of satan's convert Cain as.. 'daughters of men'. Got that?
We do remember that God did not want this to happen! (the yoke of God with the bondage o f satan) 1 Corinthians 6:14-18 & the REASON WHY as seen in Deuteronomy 7:3-4. Yet, that is exactly what happened over & over again. If you do not think so, then why do we see this 'post' of needing to tell these ones here, that their thinking is woven in with the 'son's of men mentality'?

But, lets continue on? Seth (Adams son of God) obeyed God until his descendents began starting to apostasies. And even then the children still carried on the giant 'strengths' that God gave unto them in Obedience, be it mental genius, or physical strength, + giant structure. But surely, God 's PERFECT Creation were [all] this way when created! Sin deteriorates . Notice the life span of the pre/flood ones as compared to after the flood! See Genesis 9:5
Again notice the two groups of Gods creation above, both seen with free ones choice, to Obey God or to obey satan.

But what about angels?
Do you see angels? (God can & has used angels in bodily form) Yet, He tells us that they are.. Hebrews 1:7 'And of the angels He saith, Who maketh His angels spirits,..' And in Psalm 104:4 the Word of God says again.. 'Who maketh his angels spirits; ..' And we did notice that the Genesis 6:3 verse said that it was the sons of God that came to the daughter of men and it was they who 'bare children to them'. (women angels? Hardly!) And surely Christ's Word Tel's us flat out that angels do not.. 'marry or give in marriage' Matthew 22:28-30

---Elijah

Sorry I havent had time to go thru this post in a exhausted study - but I wil. But lets look at this for a moment.

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels.

Untrue - Althought the angels were not punished at that very moment they were punished.

6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

 

[sdktlk]

This is true ... mankind is divided into two groups. The problem is in the way we, as humans, see it and the way God sees it.

"The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit." (1Cor 15:45)

"The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven." (1Cor 15:47)

In God's eyes there are only two men on the earth. The first man is the corporate (the entirety of lost humanity) first man (Adam,) whose head is satan, and the corporate (the entirety of the saved) Last man (Jesus.)

This is not to say that the Lord does not love and deal with us individually, but there should be no schism in the body.

 

[Prince]

This is true ... mankind is divided into two groups. The problem is in the way we, as humans, see it and the way God sees it.

"The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit." (1Cor 15:45)

"The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven." (1Cor 15:47)

In God's eyes there are only two men on the earth. The first man is the corporate (the entirety of lost humanity) first man (Adam,) whose head is satan, and the corporate (the entirety of the saved) Last man (Jesus.)

This is not to say that the Lord does not love and deal with us individually, but there should be no schism in the body.

I see it a little different but Ok..

The first man Adam was made a living soul

I dont believe Adam was the first man, but thats just me, and a few others LOL

This is not to say that the Lord does not love and deal with us individually, but there should be no schism in the body

I agree

 

[sdktlk]

I see it a little different but Ok..



I dont believe Adam was the first man, but thats just me, and a few others LOL



I agree

The only authority to discover who the first man was is the Word of God, outside of that it is conjecture.

 

[Prince]

The only authority to discover who the first man was is the Word of God, outside of that it is conjecture.

I use science but I always use the word of God first and foremost...

But I believe the bible itself declares Adam not to be the first man....along with a little Hebrew.

 

[sdktlk]

I use science but I always use the word of God first and foremost...

But I believe the bible itself declares Adam not to be the first man....along with a little Hebrew.

So, what does the Bible have to say with respect to the matter of Adam not being the first man?

 

[Elijah674]

Sorry I havent had time to go thru this post in a exhausted study - but I wil. But lets look at this for a moment.



Untrue - Althought the angels were not punished at that very moment they were punished.

6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

I suggest that you best read it all before your comment can be made that firm & bold to the full content of it! That is like we borrowing a buck from you & then repaying it back. And then here you come telling me that it was still owed? Which WAS True only before it was repaid!

Am 'i' spinning my wheels with that also?

--Elijah

 

[Prince]

So, what does the Bible have to say with respect to the matter of Adam not being the first man?

Hello SDKTLK

Well its a subject I dont focus on much, as there are more important matters at hand..

But in short lets look at the word "man" as it is utilized in Genesis 1:26

And God said Let us make man in our image after our likeness and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the air and over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth

This man was not Adam the word "man" used here means mankind.

Original Word: אָדָם
Transliteration: adam (the english word for mankind is adam in the Hebrew)
Phonetic Spelling: (aw-dawm')
Short Definition: man


Word Origin
from an unused word
Definition
man, mankind

When rendering the word man you must look to the artcicle (ha) and particle (eth) to determine if the word "man" means "mankind" or a particular man....

Notice that the word "man" in Genesis 1:26 does NOT have article or particle , which means that the word is rendered mankind....

For the most part (not all cases) when you see the word "adam" it means mankind, when you see haa-adam it mean the man Adam (Eves husband) when you see
eth-ha-adam it means whatever man was just being spoken of...a denotation if you will...

 

[Prince]

I suggest that you best read it all before your comment can be made that firm & bold to the full content of it! That is like we borrowing a buck from you & then repaying it back. And then here you come telling me that it was still owed? Which WAS True only before it was repaid!

Am 'i' spinning my wheels with that also?

--Elijah

Hey

Well Lets take a step back here...

ELijah you said

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels.

Your telling us that the angels were not punsished.

This is untrue - the angels were punished and here is the verse to prove it.

6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

YOu said the angels werent punished, the bible says they were locked in chains (sounds like punishment to me)

 

[Elijah674]

Hey

Well Lets take a step back here...

ELijah you said



Your telling us that the angels were not punsished.

This is untrue - the angels were punished and here is the verse to prove it.

6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

YOu said the angels werent punished, the bible says they were locked in chains (sounds like punishment to me)

At least you read some so far, huh?;) Did you get this far?? What is the context only to this point? ...

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels.

(there time will come after the 1000 years of Revelation 20:1-3 are up!)

And Christ has documented that angels do not marry in Matthew 22:30. Ask yourself, when God asks us to come and reason together, who would benefit by this satanic teaching, Christ or the devil? Christ is immortal and there has never been a time that He was not Christ/God of the Godhead! (and satan is a created being for just a short time more. Obadiah 1:16)

Me again:
And what about you & me?? Have we been punished in this context yet?? And Heb. 12:4-8's Loving Chastisements have nothing in context with Obad. 1:16 of being OBLITERATED!

But it seems to me that when you stub your toe, your post call's this being punished?? Whatever? But we have not seen anything yet! Matt. 24:21!

--Elijah

 

[Prince]

At least you read some so far, huh?;) Did you get this far?? What is the context only to this point? ...

Again: This woman/angel stuff has to be rejected as having no merit, because the punishment was for the sins of human beings and not angels.

(there time will come after the 1000 years of Revelation 20:1-3 are up!)

And Christ has documented that angels do not marry in Matthew 22:30. Ask yourself, when God asks us to come and reason together, who would benefit by this satanic teaching, Christ or the devil? Christ is immortal and there has never been a time that He was not Christ/God of the Godhead! (and satan is a created being for just a short time more. Obadiah 1:16)

Me again:
And what about you & me?? Have we been punished in this context yet?? And Heb. 12:4-8's Loving Chastisements have nothing in context with Obad. 1:16 of being OBLITERATED!

But it seems to me that when you stub your toe, your post call's this being punished?? Whatever? But we have not seen anything yet! Matt. 24:21!

--Elijah

You are not rightly dividing the word friend... Lets take it verse by verse..

24Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

Notice the subject here is if a man dies - stay on subject.

Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother:

This is a hypothetical situation based on the law of deuteronomy which says

If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her.

Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh. 27And last of all the woman died also.

So a woman married a man and he died, so she married his brother and he died, and then another brother until she married 7 and they all died then she died.

The subject of this is what happens to people when they die. The subject is NOT fallen angels.

When we as humans die we are changed and we do not marry anymore in heaven - that has nothing to do with the fallen angels who came to earth and had sex with woman.

also note - your evading the text. the text says Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven

So they are asking Jesus about a future event (ressurection) - well the fallen angels mating with woman his history.

You cannot take the subject and object of this passage that has to do with mankind dying and going to heaven and place it on fallen angels who came down from heaven and are locked in chains.

So people that die on earth and go to heaven dont marry, ok , but angels that left there home and mated with women long before the ressurection - and theyre going be back to do it again.

 

[sdktlk]

Hello SDKTLK

Well its a subject I dont focus on much, as there are more important matters at hand..

But in short lets look at the word "man" as it is utilized in Genesis 1:26

And God said Let us make man in our image after our likeness and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the air and over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth

This man was not Adam the word "man" used here means mankind.

Original Word: אָדָם
Transliteration: adam (the english word for mankind is adam in the Hebrew)
Phonetic Spelling: (aw-dawm')
Short Definition: man


Word Origin
from an unused word
Definition
man, mankind

When rendering the word man you must look to the artcicle (ha) and particle (eth) to determine if the word "man" means "mankind" or a particular man....

Notice that the word "man" in Genesis 1:26 does NOT have article or particle , which means that the word is rendered mankind....

For the most part (not all cases) when you see the word "adam" it means mankind, when you see haa-adam it mean the man Adam (Eves husband) when you see
eth-ha-adam it means whatever man was just being spoken of...a denotation if you will...

Agreed, Gen 1:26 is speaking of the creation of mankind (H120 Strong's). However, as we come to Gen 2:19 we see "God...brought unto Adam" (H121 Strong's) In the first instance God is speaking of mankind as a race, in the second He is pointing to a man, as in one. Peace.

 

[Prince]

Agreed, Gen 1:26 is speaking of the creation of mankind (H120 Strong's). However, as we come to Gen 2:19 we see "God...brought unto Adam" (H121 Strong's) In the first instance God is speaking of mankind as a race, in the second He is pointing to a man, as in one. Peace.

Woa didnt see that coming... I think im going to have to check out more of your posts/threads...gyeah

 

[Elijah674]

You are not rightly dividing the word friend... Lets take it verse by verse..

24Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

Notice the subject here is if a man dies - stay on subject.

Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no issue, left his wife unto his brother:

This is a hypothetical situation based on the law of deuteronomy which says

If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her.

Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh. 27And last of all the woman died also.

So a woman married a man and he died, so she married his brother and he died, and then another brother until she married 7 and they all died then she died.

The subject of this is what happens to people when they die. The subject is NOT fallen angels.

When we as humans die we are changed and we do not marry anymore in heaven - that has nothing to do with the fallen angels who came to earth and had sex with woman.

also note - your evading the text. the text says Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven

So they are asking Jesus about a future event (ressurection) - well the fallen angels mating with woman his history.

You cannot take the subject and object of this passage that has to do with mankind dying and going to heaven and place it on fallen angels who came down from heaven and are locked in chains.

So people that die on earth and go to heaven dont marry, ok , but angels that left there home and mated with women long before the ressurection - and theyre going be back to do it again.

Whatever? We just are not of the same tribe if any tribe, huh?? You can have the last word, but for this to just keep going on at my end at least, falls in Titus 3:9-11 catagory perhaps?? (at least useless & vain as 'i' see it!)

And marrying an angel?? You will most likely 'twist' this up also? (2 Cor. 4:2) but I will take the chance for the forum members at least to see, maybe? And that is that I have been married to one for well over 50 years! And that is about the closest that I can come to your false theology!

--Elijah

 

[Prince]

Whatever? We just are not of the same tribe if any tribe, huh?? You can have the last word, but for this to just keep going on at my end at least, falls in Titus 3:9-11 catagory perhaps?? (at least useless & vain as 'i' see it!)

And marrying an angel?? You will most likely 'twist' this up also? (2 Cor. 4:2) but I will take the chance for the forum members at least to see, maybe? And that is that I have been married to one for well over 50 years! And that is about the closest that I can come to your false theology!

--Elijah

Whatever? We just are not of the same tribe if any tribe, huh??

You seem kinda angry, but I dont know why? I dont know about the tribe thing - but are we not both believers in Christ? (Im sure we are) If we disagree concerning this will that effect your personal relationship with the Lord, I think not.

You can have the last word, but for this to just keep going on at my end at least, falls in Titus 3:9-11 catagory perhaps??

Titus 3:9-11

Titus 3:9 "But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain."

Titus 3:10 "A man that is a heretick, after the first and second admonition reject;"

Titus 3:11 "Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself."

So since I disagree with you - you believe me to be heretick? Let me ask you this, in the last post I left you did you understand it? Do you understand Hebrew article and particle and how it is used in denotation? If not (which it seems you dont) you have no right to claim me false of what you do not understand. Perhaps you though you would present you your thread without people questioning it.

1 Thess 5:21- Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

And marrying an angel?? You will most likely 'twist' this up also

The angel in Genesis 6 went into (sex) with the daughters of Adam, to corrupt the bloodline that would lead to Christ, I can prove this on many levels, and I believe you know as well as I do you dont have a leg to stand on concerning a proper rebuttal.

You will most likely 'twist' this up also? (2 Cor. 4:2) but I will take the chance for the forum members at least to see, maybe? And that is that I have been married to one for well over 50 years! And that is about the closest that I can come to your false theology!

Ok.

 

[Prince]

Genesis 6

Genesis 6:1 "And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,"

The word "man" is reffering to Adam (Husband of Eve) It is not reffering to all of mankind - you must keep in mind the old Testament is basically about a family that would lead to Christ.

The word for Men הָֽאָדָ֔ם- this word has what is known as Hebrew article and that means we are talking about a particular man, of course the man Adam, not all of mankind note- I do not believe the flood was worldwide the flood was focused on the land of Adamics (most likely the tarim basin)

Genesis 6:2 "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose."

The sons of God are angels every time you see the phrase "Sons of God" in the OT it refers to angels..Jesus came and made us all sons of God (basically)

So we have a bunch of Adamic women and we have fallen angels that took these woman as wives.

Genesis 6:3 "And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years."

Gods getting angry.

Genesis 6:4 "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

Notice - there were giants in those days and After whcih means later in the bible you are going to see more of these giants.

The Sons of God came in unto the Daughters of Adam (that means that had sex with them and released into them)

What we have here is an attempt by satans army to destroy every single person that God could use that would lead a geneaology to Christ, it almost worked except Noah and his family did not mix with the angels.