[_ Old Earth _] Mighty Mouse

[Heidi]

Since humans and mice share 99% of their genes, then by the reasoning of evolutionary scientists,the human had to have evolved from the mouse. Thus, the common ancestor could have been a flying mouse. I'll use the same procedure that they use to describe how an ape turned into a human.

"Over time", the mouse dropped its wings and tail, and became fat. Then realizing that the food on the ground was too fattening, the mouse "naturally selected" food that grew on the bushes. So gradually, its legs stretched out, its arms grew longer so it could reach for the food on the bushes. But unfortunately, this particular food was too big for its mouth, so again, the mouse developed genes that gave it a bigger mouth and stomach so it could digest the food on the bushes.

After several hundred thousand years, the mice grew tired of the food on the bushes because by then, they began to develop the ability to think and their appetites began to increase.The fruit on the higher trees looked more appetizing to them. They had also developed vocal chords by then and began to quibble among themselves about whether or not they wanted to use their willpower to naturally select better food. The ones who yelled the loudest won out . So their genes changed again and their arms and legs grew longer and longer until they could reach the food on higher trees. Now they felt mighty!

But unfortunately, that didn't happen to all the mice. In fact, most of them just remained rodents and to this day are still scurrying around on the ground looking for food. They are fortunate that they didn't develop the capacity for jealousy so they could be content when their ancestors changed into humans and they didn't. It makes one wonder who's better off? The mice of today, or their ancestors who turned into humans. ;-)

 

[Deep Thought]

Heidi, as a new-comer to these forums, I have to ask whether you honestly, hand-on-heart believe the stuff you write or whether you just enjoy stirring up people?

 

[John]

You must like getting flamed, logic does not work on evolutionists, lol

 

[John]

Heidi, as a new-comer to these forums, I have to ask whether you honestly, hand-on-heart believe the stuff you write or whether you just enjoy stirring up people?

you can use hundreds of examples, but they are never answered because evolution can't explain them, because it never happened.

 

[Heidi]

Heidi, as a new-comer to these forums, I have to ask whether you honestly, hand-on-heart believe the stuff you write or whether you just enjoy stirring up people?

No one in his right mind would believe that humans are descendants of animals. I'm simply showing the absurdity of the theory of evolution.

And by the way, I'm not a new-comer. I've posted here on and off for the last several years. ;-)

 

[freeway]

So Heidi, that gives new meaning to "winning the rat race" :-D

 

[Heidi]

Heidi, as a new-comer to these forums, I have to ask whether you honestly, hand-on-heart believe the stuff you write or whether you just enjoy stirring up people?

you can use hundreds of examples, but they are never answered because evolution can't explain them, because it never happened.

How right you are. It's just a ridiculous fairy tale that shows that the wisdom of the world is indeed foolishness in God's sight. ;-)

 

[Deep Thought]

I was referring to myself as a new-comer, not you Heidi (probably could have phrased it better).

If you seriously think your example is even vaguely related to evolution, then you either have one of the worst misunderstandings of evolution I've come across, or you feel so threatened by your creationist position that you have to make up ludicrous statements and expect a serious answer.

 

[John]

I was referring to myself as a new-comer, not you Heidi (probably could have phrased it better).

If you seriously think your example is even vaguely related to evolution, then you either have one of the worst misunderstandings of evolution I've come across, or you feel so threatened by your creationist position that you have to make up ludicrous statements and expect a serious answer.

apes to man, seems pretty ludicrous to me, and it follows the same lines as what heidi wrote. rats, apes, it does not matter.

 

[freeway]

[attachment=0:bda01]soup can.jpg[/attachment:bda01]Oh and by all means lets not forget where we really come from.... :-D

 

[Jayls5]

Since humans and mice share 99% of their genes, then by the reasoning of evolutionary scientists,the human had to have evolved from the mouse. Thus, the common ancestor could have been a flying mouse. I'll use the same procedure that they use to describe how an ape turned into a human.

"Over time", the mouse dropped its wings and tail, and became fat. Then realizing that the food on the ground was too fattening, the mouse "naturally selected" food that grew on the bushes. So gradually, its legs stretched out, its arms grew longer so it could reach for the food on the bushes. But unfortunately, this particular food was too big for its mouth, so again, the mouse developed genes that gave it a bigger mouth and stomach so it could digest the food on the bushes.

After several hundred thousand years, the mice grew tired of the food on the bushes because by then, they began to develop the ability to think and their appetites began to increase.The fruit on the higher trees looked more appetizing to them. They had also developed vocal chords by then and began to quibble among themselves about whether or not they wanted to use their willpower to naturally select better food. The ones who yelled the loudest won out . So their genes changed again and their arms and legs grew longer and longer until they could reach the food on higher trees. Now they felt mighty!

But unfortunately, that didn't happen to all the mice. In fact, most of them just remained rodents and to this day are still scurrying around on the ground looking for food. They are fortunate that they didn't develop the capacity for jealousy so they could be content when their ancestors changed into humans and they didn't. It makes one wonder who's better off? The mice of today, or their ancestors who turned into humans. ;-)

Evolution can't exist because people like Heidi should have died out a long time ago.

 

[Heidi]

Since humans and mice share 99% of their genes, then by the reasoning of evolutionary scientists,the human had to have evolved from the mouse. Thus, the common ancestor could have been a flying mouse. I'll use the same procedure that they use to describe how an ape turned into a human.

"Over time", the mouse dropped its wings and tail, and became fat. Then realizing that the food on the ground was too fattening, the mouse "naturally selected" food that grew on the bushes. So gradually, its legs stretched out, its arms grew longer so it could reach for the food on the bushes. But unfortunately, this particular food was too big for its mouth, so again, the mouse developed genes that gave it a bigger mouth and stomach so it could digest the food on the bushes.

After several hundred thousand years, the mice grew tired of the food on the bushes because by then, they began to develop the ability to think and their appetites began to increase.The fruit on the higher trees looked more appetizing to them. They had also developed vocal chords by then and began to quibble among themselves about whether or not they wanted to use their willpower to naturally select better food. The ones who yelled the loudest won out . So their genes changed again and their arms and legs grew longer and longer until they could reach the food on higher trees. Now they felt mighty!

But unfortunately, that didn't happen to all the mice. In fact, most of them just remained rodents and to this day are still scurrying around on the ground looking for food. They are fortunate that they didn't develop the capacity for jealousy so they could be content when their ancestors changed into humans and they didn't. It makes one wonder who's better off? The mice of today, or their ancestors who turned into humans. ;-)

Evolution can't exist because people like Heidi should have died out a long time ago.

Well let's start playing verbal volleyball when we can't refute someone's post. After all that's what people who can't explain the contradictions in their belief systems do. But I can't do that because i know it doesn't change reality one iota. Do you think that by telling someone she should have died long makes your theory more rational? :o If so, then please explain why. If not, then your comments are nothing but destructive comments that go nowhere except back to the heart where they came from.

 

[Relic]

.


I wish these teachers would make up their minds already.

Are you a man or a mouse?
are you a monkey or a mouse?


Hey, Hey, we're the Monkees.

Awe Geez Mom, and then come tuesday ...
they want us to wear this mouse mask! :o

.

 

[jwu]

I'm simply showing the absurdity of the theory of evolution.

For that it would be helpful if you'd actually talk about the ToE, not some grotesque parody of it.

 

[John]

But its so easy and fun.

 

[Jayls5]

Since humans and mice share 99% of their genes, then by the reasoning of evolutionary scientists,the human had to have evolved from the mouse. Thus, the common ancestor could have been a flying mouse. I'll use the same procedure that they use to describe how an ape turned into a human.

"Over time", the mouse dropped its wings and tail, and became fat. Then realizing that the food on the ground was too fattening, the mouse "naturally selected" food that grew on the bushes. So gradually, its legs stretched out, its arms grew longer so it could reach for the food on the bushes. But unfortunately, this particular food was too big for its mouth, so again, the mouse developed genes that gave it a bigger mouth and stomach so it could digest the food on the bushes.

After several hundred thousand years, the mice grew tired of the food on the bushes because by then, they began to develop the ability to think and their appetites began to increase.The fruit on the higher trees looked more appetizing to them. They had also developed vocal chords by then and began to quibble among themselves about whether or not they wanted to use their willpower to naturally select better food. The ones who yelled the loudest won out . So their genes changed again and their arms and legs grew longer and longer until they could reach the food on higher trees. Now they felt mighty!

But unfortunately, that didn't happen to all the mice. In fact, most of them just remained rodents and to this day are still scurrying around on the ground looking for food. They are fortunate that they didn't develop the capacity for jealousy so they could be content when their ancestors changed into humans and they didn't. It makes one wonder who's better off? The mice of today, or their ancestors who turned into humans. ;-)

Evolution can't exist because people like Heidi should have died out a long time ago.

Well let's start playing verbal volleyball when we can't refute someone's post. After all that's what people who can't explain the contradictions in their belief systems do. But I can't do that because i know it doesn't change reality one iota. Do you think that by telling someone she should have died long makes your theory more rational? :o If so, then please explain why. If not, then your comments are nothing but destructive comments that go nowhere except back to the heart where they came from.

H Y P O C R I T E

You have ignored so many different people on this forum, you deserve nothing but laughter for this post.

 

[John]

O no not caps again, and this time they have spaces between them, remember boys and girls : CAPS = FACTS :

 

[Ignatz]

O no not caps again, and this time they have spaces between them, remember boys and girls : CAPS = FACTS :

I'd think twice about defending Heidi when she is being called a hypocrite for the reasons above. If you look back at her posts, you'll see that this woman routinely ignores the issue at hand, misrepresenting her opponents actual position and using strawman arguments despite the fact that their real position has been explained to her time and time again.

She is the most dishonest and disingenuous person on this site, who clearly believes that distortion of the truth and her opponent's views as well as outright lying about the ToE are acceptable tactics in a debate forum. :

 

[Heidi]

But its so easy and fun.

[/

quote]

: It is easy and fun. I know that evolutionists can't help themselves because they're being deceived by Satan. So I just have fun with them because it's the only way for some of them to see the absurdity of their theories. Unfortunately though, most of them don't understand the simple birds and bees so they don't know why apes aren't turning into humans today. : According to them, it only happened before there were any witnesses. :o Nevertheless, if they want to call themselves apes, they're free to do so even though all children can tell the difference between a human and an ape. ;-)

 

[Dunzo]

But its so easy and fun.

: It is easy and fun. I know that evolutionists can't help themselves because they're being deceived by Satan.

Uggghhh, what nonsense. Deception by Satan is such a laughable concept.

So I just have fun with them because it's the only way for some of them to see the absurdity of their theories. Unfortunately though, most of them don't understand the simple birds and bees so they don't know why apes aren't turning into humans today.

Actually I think it's just you who doesn't know. Who says the apes of today will eventually turn into humans anyway? Evolution is an extremely slow, UNGUIDED process.

According to them, it only happened before there were any witnesses. :o

We're witnessing it now. Hopefully this'll be the last time I have to repeat this to you, Heidi, this is a terrible argument. If humans were around to see their own transition from apes to humans that'd be kinda paradoxical now wouldn't it (although technically we're directly witnessing it now anyway, but I shan't go into that, I've done it before and you either didn't understand or totally ignored it)? We've observed evolution in plenty of other instances, which I've explained to you many times before, and would be more than almost-kinda-not-really happy to explain to you once again.

Nevertheless, if they want to call themselves apes, they're free to do so even though all children can tell the difference between a human and an ape. ;-)

And children can even see the similarities between them too.