PCs vs Macs

[Lewis]

PCs vs Macs: How they stack up

Since the 1990s, hardcore PC and Mac users have been waging an epic food fight over which system is better.
In the old days, PC users poked fun at the under-powered processors and buggy software that Mac users had to endure. Mac users needed only to counter with "Windows 98."


Today, the argument is more philosophical: who's good, who's evil, who's more brainwashed.
No side is ever going to win this war, of course, and the rhetoric does little to actually help an average user decide on a new computer and get some work done.
That's unfortunate, because in many ways this is shaping up to be a golden year for buying computers.
Ultrabooks (the PC world's answer to the MacBook Air) are getting better all the time. Models such as the Asus Zenbook and Dell XPS are a credit to the breed.



Laptops and desktops are being outfitted with the latest Intel Ivy Bridge chips. And Windows 8, due to ship Oct. 26, promises to turn PC computing on its head.
In the other corner, Apple just turbocharged the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro with Ivy Bridge processors. The flagship 15-inch MacBook Pro also received a retina display, previously available only on the latest generation iPad. iMacs should get a makeover soon. Just think how much more exciting your new iMac would be if it included a retina display. It could happen.


But those are minor skirmishes. Let's take a fresh look at PC vs. Mac and see who's winning the battle (if not the war) in key categories. Depending on your needs, it might help you make a decision.

Price
Winner: PC
Some of the highly engineered Ultrabooks have finally caught up to or surpassed the $1,000 entry level MacBook Air.
But most PC users can buy a perfectly good laptop or desktop for around $500. If you walk into an Apple Store with $500, you're still $100 shy of a Mac mini.

Design
Winner: Mac
Many devotees appreciate that Apple spends years sweating design details.
If you want a space-saving all-in-one desktop -- and actually want to look at it all day -- the iMac is the only choice. However, demanding design pros also know that the inside of an iMac can handle the most intensive tasks.
You won't find many staunch PC advocates defending their laptop trackpads against MacBook users. On-the-go PC warriors learned a long time ago to pack a mouse.

Operating system
Winner: Tie game
Both OS X and Windows become second nature for users with a little experience.
Now three years old, Windows 7 offers PC users superb speed, stability and functionality -- with very few problems. Mac users have the option of installing and running Windows with the Boot Camp tool.
Both operating systems are heading for a slimmed down, touch-based, mobile-influenced future.

Software
Winner: PC
For the average user, this may be more of a tie. But if you're a finance person or a gamer, you know the Mac finishes a poor second.
Microsoft Office hasn't gotten around to optimizing Office for the retina display. Besides that, the productivity suite for Mac is every bit as functional as the Windows version. Adobe programs and other major software titles are very similar or identical on both platforms.


Mac versions of Quicken and Quickbooks Pro, however, have long been considered poor substitutes to their PC counterparts.
And pity the poor Mac gamer. He's been wandering the desert for years. If a game-maker even deigns to make a Mac version of a title, it will come out months after the PC release.
PC gamers enjoy a vast library of games and can take advantage of extreme graphics cards tweaked for gaming performance.

Customization
Winner: PC
The compromise you accept when you choose Apple's super-sleek design aesthetic is that do-it-yourself upgrading is impossible unless you're an expert.
You can't even replace the RAM in a MacBook Air or a MacBook Pro with retina display because the memory is soldered to the logic board
With PCs, it's easy to swap out drives and sound and graphic cards, or even build a custom PC from the ground up if you're reasonably handy.

Security
Winner: Tie game
High profile malware attacks against Macs this year should have shattered the illusion that Apple computers are inherently more secure than PCs. You're not safe just because you haven't been attacked or are attacked less frequently.
You're secure when you have antivirus software installed - and can withstand a hit.
So the tally for now, with ties factored in, is:

PC - 3 1/2
Mac - 1 1/2
Kim Komando hosts the nation's largest talk radio show about consumer electronics, computers and the Internet. To get the podcast, watch the show or find the station nearest you, visit www.komando.com. E-mail her at

 

[tim-from-pa]

Now let me add my two cents:

Price:

Winner, Linux because you can't beat free.

Design:

Depends, matter of opinion. If Mac is the winner, then Linux Ubuntu should be a close second at least since I thought it works similar to a Mac.

Operating System:

"Both OS X and Windows become second nature for users with a little experience."
And again, Ubuntu IMO is even simpler. Took me 5 minutes to learn all the main and necessary commands (there are very few actually) to work and customize my machine. It's an OS that grandma can use comfortably despite the protests from those who last used Linux 20 years ago and claim it's only for sophisticated geeks that can understand it (amazing how someone with no 5 minutes of experience talk like they know all about it, eh? :wink3 )

Software:

While people complain of the lack of software for Linux, what they are really saying is that their favorite software does not work on it. Actually, Linux has an equivalent somewhere and the real issue is people don't want to spend the time getting familiar with it. I'm absolutely amazed at how much free software there is out there, not the least of which is Libre office, equivalent to Word, Excel, Powerpoint and yes, even create .pdf documents!! For free.

Customization:

Well, if some people want to still believe Linux is a geeky OS, then I'll accept that in this case, because you see, any computer you can load Microsoft on you can load Linux. Hardware and geekishness go arm in arm. Hardware issues is one of the first things Linux always tackled well. That's because in the original geek world they all once built their own computers from all kinds of parts. But more recently Linux extended its arms for ALL users, but with the technological edge still in mind.

Security:

That's a laugh that Microsoft and Macs were tied. Who paid them off to say that? Comparing viral prone Microsoft to a Mac is like saying the "bubble boy" who lives in a sphere because he catches everything is just as healthy (as long as he's in there) to a normal kid whose outside but catches a cold once in a blue moon. And Linux is just as secure (if not more so) than a Mac. Linux updates many times a week and people find the weaknesses and security holes rather quickly which becomes a firewall and virus protection of sorts in and of itself.