[_ Old Earth _] Reasons not to change the bible

[Heidi]

Genesis 2:7, "The Lord formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and the man became a living being."

There are reasons that God used dust to create man. Here are some of them:

1) God is showing man that man is no better than dust in God's eyes because man is at the mercy of God to even create him
2) Man is as numerous and insignificant as the trillions of dust particles compared to the trillions of other people who've ever lived
3) Man's life is as fleeting as dust particles and man will return to dust and ashes when he dies
4) God can create a maginificant design from something as simple and as small as dust is, jsut as he created the universe
5) God created man differently than animals to show that man's calling is different and more special than animals

And many more reasons. So once people start changing even one word in the bible, they end up changing the whole bible. God compares man with dust in other parts of the bible and he sets the foundation for it in Genesis. And claiming that man came from the wombs of animals makes man at the mercy of animals for his creation rather than ruling over the animals and at the mercy of God. So it's an insult to God to change his words as well as an insult to his design. :x

So God's words should never be messed with any more than someone twisting any of your words and making up stories about what any one you says. That would reak havoc in your life, so you can imagine what it does to God.

So you "Christian" evolutionists should be ashamed of yourselves for trying to justify changing Genesis 2:7 into claiming that God created man out of the wombs of apes, all to agree with the secular world which is ruled by Satan. :x But most people do believe what the majority believes which is why Revelation tells us that only the elect won't be deceived by the anti-Christ and Jesus tells us that few will find the narrow road.

So if you really consider yourself a Christian, then believe what Jesus tells us; "What is highly valued by the world is detestable in God's sight" and; "The wisomd of the world is foolishness in God's sight." When scientists agree with God, they're always right. But when they disagree with God, they're always wrong as the foolish theory of evolution proves better than anything. :roll:

 

[chad87]

im bored, so ill bite.

1) God is showing man that man is no better than dust in God's eyes because man is at the mercy of God to even create him
2) Man is as numerous and insignificant as the trillions of dust particles compared to the trillions of other people who've ever lived
3) Man's life is as fleeting as dust particles and man will return to dust and ashes when he dies
4) God can create a maginificant design from something as simple and as small as dust is, jsut as he created the universe
5) God created man differently than animals to show that man's calling is different and more special than animals

god constantly says humans are insignificant, yet he is dependant on humans to spread his belief and idealogy. humans wrote the bible, and if they didnt, he would not exist. so who is a the mercy of who?

humans magnificant?, god has a way of playing stupid jokes, we are capable of dangerous and unspeakable things. some of them in the name of god... any one hear "crusades" in the distance??

also i want evidence of god creating us from dust.

from your arguement, god created man from dust, and so we return to dust when we die... since animal return to dust when they die, what were they made of?

at the end of the day, an animals blood is red like humans, they ahve bones like humans, which is covered in muscle, tissues, like humans, they eat, and then shit <-- ( what the hell, talk aobut putting words in some ones mouth) i meant sh*t like humans... they like/dislike the cold/heat, seek shelter from the cold/heat, mate to breed. blah blah...

AND NO, I AM NOT SAYING A DOG TURNS INTO A HUMAN... I AM JSUT SAYING AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE SHARE CHARACTERISTICS WITH OTHER MAMMALS.

AND DONT BRING IN APES AND HUMANS..

YOU KEEP USING THE SAME ARGUEMENT, BRING SOMETHING WITH MORE SUBSTANCE

 

[Heidi]

im bored, so ill bite.

1) God is showing man that man is no better than dust in God's eyes because man is at the mercy of God to even create him
2) Man is as numerous and insignificant as the trillions of dust particles compared to the trillions of other people who've ever lived
3) Man's life is as fleeting as dust particles and man will return to dust and ashes when he dies
4) God can create a maginificant design from something as simple and as small as dust is, jsut as he created the universe
5) God created man differently than animals to show that man's calling is different and more special than animals

god constantly says humans are insignificant, yet he is dependant on humans to spread his belief and idealogy. humans wrote the bible, and if they didnt, he would not exist. so who is a the mercy of who?

humans magnificant?, god has a way of playing stupid jokes, we are capable of dangerous and unspeakable things. some of them in the name of god... any one hear "crusades" in the distance??

also i want evidence of god creating us from dust.

from your arguement, god created man from dust, and so we return to dust when we die... since animal return to dust when they die, what were they made of?

at the end of the day, an animals blood is red like humans, they ahve bones like humans, which is covered in muscle, tissues, like humans, they eat, and then I love Jesus a lot <-- ( what the hell, talk aobut putting words in some ones mouth) i meant sh*t like humans... they like/dislike the cold/heat, seek shelter from the cold/heat, mate to breed. blah blah...

AND NO, I AM NOT SAYING A DOG TURNS INTO A HUMAN... I AM JSUT SAYING AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE SHARE CHARACTERISTICS WITH OTHER MAMMALS.

AND DONT BRING IN APES AND HUMANS..

YOU KEEP USING THE SAME ARGUEMENT, BRING SOMETHING WITH MORE SUBSTANCE

Sorry, but since the theory of evolution was founded because Darwin wanted to defy the biblical account of creation and the origin of man, than apes turning into humans is at the core of his theory.

And again, the reason we share common traits is because in order to survive in the world that God created, land animals and humans have to have the following in common:

1) A heart
2) A brain
3) Lungs
4) A respiratory system
5) A nervous system
6) A circulatory system
7) A reproductive system
8) Skin
9) 2 eyes, 2 ears, a nose and a mouth
10) Limbs

And on and on and on. So animals and humans are going to have a lot more similar traits than different traits! But evolutionists don't understand that at all. : They think the similar traits makes a human an animal and means that animals and humans can produce each other as offspring. :o :

That's a perfect example of jumping to impossible conclusions without looking at all sides of an issue. But that's what happens in the manic excitement that accompanies trying to play God; bias, tunnel vision, and illogical conclusions, not science. :

 

[chad87]

why skin and not an exoskeleton, he couldve made animal blood different, like when you step on a cockroach, its white. so why all the similarity, maybe he was lazy? we need 2 eyes because of depth perception, but why didnt he make the animals with 1 eye, or 1 large ear? he couldve given us 1 eye, but got rid of the depth perception problem.

and its funny how you talk of illogical, yet you say god made us from dust...
and your only source for evidence is the bible, with out it, you have nothing, not to mention it was man that wrote the bible.

 

[Heidi]

why skin and not an exoskeleton, he couldve made animal blood different, like when you step on a cockroach, its white. so why all the similarity, maybe he was lazy? we need 2 eyes because of depth perception, but why didnt he make the animals with 1 eye, or 1 large ear? he couldve given us 1 eye, but got rid of the depth perception problem.

and its funny how you talk of illogical, yet you say god made us from dust...
and your only source for evidence is the bible, with out it, you have nothing, not to mention it was man that wrote the bible.

Each animal and human were given the traits that it needs for the purpose for which God designed that animal and/or human. So even when humans don't understand each human's or animal's purpose, God does.

 

[chad87]

yous till avhe not given evidence... do you agree that your only source is the bible, and if man did not write the bible, then god would not exist?

 

[Dunzo]

Sorry, but since the theory of evolution was founded because Darwin wanted to defy the biblical account of creation and the origin of man, than apes turning into humans is at the core of his theory.

Liar. Darwin went on The Beagle simply because he was invited and was interested in the subjets of geology and biology, not because he was a god-hating atheist.
Darwin was in fact a christian early in his life, and only during his trip on the Beagle did he begin to doubt the literal interpretation of the bible.

And again, the reason we share common traits is because in order to survive in the world that God created, land animals and humans have to have the following in common:

1) A heart
2) A brain
3) Lungs
4) A respiratory system
5) A nervous system
6) A circulatory system
7) A reproductive system
8) Skin
9) 2 eyes, 2 ears, a nose and a mouth
10) Limbs

And on and on and on. So animals and humans are going to have a lot more similar traits than different traits! But evolutionists don't understand that at all. : They think the similar traits makes a human an animal and means that animals and humans can produce each other as offspring. :o :

HAHAHA. NO. The fact that all animals share these organs is not evidence for creation. In fact, the attributes you have pointed out are evidence for a universal common ancestor.
Your little refutation of evolution you added on to the end there is utter nonsense, by the way. You haven't read our posts and haven't changed your flawed views.

That's a perfect example of jumping to impossible conclusions without looking at all sides of an issue. But that's what happens in the manic excitement that accompanies trying to play God; bias, tunnel vision, and illogical conclusions, not science. :

1. Find a mirror.
2. Look in it.
3. Repeat step 2 until you realize the hypocrisy and inanity of your statement.

 

[chad87]

^^^ she wont understand that.. god wont allow her

 

[Heidi]

Sorry, but since the theory of evolution was founded because Darwin wanted to defy the biblical account of creation and the origin of man, than apes turning into humans is at the core of his theory.

Liar. Darwin went on The Beagle simply because he was invited and was interested in the subjets of geology and biology, not because he was a god-hating atheist.
Darwin was in fact a christian early in his life, and only during his trip on the Beagle did he begin to doubt the literal interpretation of the bible.

And again, the reason we share common traits is because in order to survive in the world that God created, land animals and humans have to have the following in common:

1) A heart
2) A brain
3) Lungs
4) A respiratory system
5) A nervous system
6) A circulatory system
7) A reproductive system
8) Skin
9) 2 eyes, 2 ears, a nose and a mouth
10) Limbs

And on and on and on. So animals and humans are going to have a lot more similar traits than different traits! But evolutionists don't understand that at all. : They think the similar traits makes a human an animal and means that animals and humans can produce each other as offspring. :o :

HAHAHA. NO. The fact that all animals share these organs is not evidence for creation. In fact, the attributes you have pointed out are evidence for a universal common ancestor.
Your little refutation of evolution you added on to the end there is utter nonsense, by the way. You haven't read our posts and haven't changed your flawed views.

[quote:5745d]That's a perfect example of jumping to impossible conclusions without looking at all sides of an issue. But that's what happens in the manic excitement that accompanies trying to play God; bias, tunnel vision, and illogical conclusions, not science. :

1. Find a mirror.
2. Look in it.
3. Repeat step 2 until you realize the hypocrisy and inanity of your statement.[/quote:5745d]

So why don't animals keep breeding each other today if their reproductive systems were created to breed humans and any other species? :o So again, your statement isn't factual any more than it's logical. : It just shows the tunnel vision of "human" reasoning. :roll:

 

[Dunzo]

So why don't animals keep breeding each other today if their reproductive systems were created to breed humans and any other species? :o So again, your statement isn't factual any more than it's logical. : It just shows the tunnel vision of "human" reasoning. :roll:

...Huh? Could you elaborate on that please? I don't know what you're getting at.

 

[Heidi]

So why don't animals keep breeding each other today if their reproductive systems were created to breed humans and any other species? :o So again, your statement isn't factual any more than it's logical. : It just shows the tunnel vision of "human" reasoning. :roll:

...Huh? Could you elaborate on that please? I don't know what you're getting at.

You said that the similar traits between humans and animals is proof that we all came from a common ancestor, which of course, it is not at all since I explained why the traits are similar.

So I'm asking you why animals and humans don't breed each other today if we are all ancestors? The answer is simple; the reproductive systems in each animal and human can only reproduce itself, it cannot passs along the genes or DNA of another animal.

So humans were not designed to breed skunks, monkeys, giraffes, zebras, any more than monkeys were designed to breed elephants, tigers, or humans. : So your "conclusion" that we all came from a common ancestor isn't factual because the reproductive systems of each animal and human were not designed to breed other animals or humans as reality shows us. ;-)

 

[Dunzo]

You might as well be asking why your brother doesn't breed your sister if they both share the same father.

You are correct in saying that "the reproductive systems in each animal and human can only reproduce itself, it cannot passs along the genes or DNA of another animal", but you have completely failed to take mutation and natural selection into account. Once again you have implied that evolution requires one animal to give birth to an entirely different species, and once again I am telling you that this is not the case. The change from one species to another occurs through very gradual degrees.