- Jan 23, 2011
- 5,056
- 536
Fake News of "The Israeli Occupation"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
How do you explain Hamas' rejection of the two state solution, in both word and deed. Israel left Gaza, international money flowed in, it could have become "Club Med", instead they used it all to wage war against Israel that had given them their own state. Gaza.Then you have to add in that the Camp David Accords was a treaty and agreement between Israel and Egyp about the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Jordan formerly controlled the West Bank, but it went under Israel's control and the Gaza Strip was formerly Egyptian Territory. The deal was to lead to autonomous states, but Israel has waffles on whether to honor the agreement or not. Usually the fighting starts back up when land disputes arive since Jeruselem is supposed to be nuetral territory and that has not always been honored.
As I mentioned. Its a complicated history due to how Gaza was formed without input from the people that lived there. Hamas is not the good guys and depending on who us leadership in Israel neither are they. You have multiple groups all trying to have control over the same land. Sometimes Israel leaves Gaza alone, sometimes they don't. It's not a black and white issue.How do you explain Hamas' rejection of the two state solution, in both word and deed. Israel left Gaza, international money flowed in, it could have become "Club Med", instead they used it all to wage war against Israel that had given them their own state. Gaza.
I am aware. What I am saying is that historical the situation is complicated. Considering that Jordan,Egypt,Lebanon, Saudiarabia, and Iraq were all part of the rise of Arab Nationalism that fought with the Ottomon Empire for control of the area and the creation of the state of Israel was contentious in the region post World War 2. Considering how the newly formed UN botched agreements with the region in 47. It was a situation of what to do with agreements and a large Mount of Displaced Jewish people. Almost 80 years later.and it's a mess.Peace between Islam and Jews is highly unlikely as it means rejecting Islamic teaching in the quran.
Try reading this analysis of Islamic antisemitism:-
![]()
Islamic Antisemitism Drives the Arab-Israeli Conflict
An underestimated, unappreciated, and oft-denied driver of the Arab-Israeli conflict is Islamic religious antisemitism. How deeply entrenched is this religious bigotry, and can it prevent, or slow down, the nascent reconciliation between Israel and thewww.meforum.org
Yep, and during ww2 the British were also promising the Arab nationalists the entire territory. Then hot potatoed it to the UN.Balfour doctrine ,the great white lie. it was part of brittain after WW1.
Yes, I said that earlier in the thread.gaza was part of Egypt and the west bank part of Jordan .
How would you interpret this? Its consistent with Trump's depopulation of Gaza, and rebuilding it as an Israeli development, "Club Gaza". Evidently, Somaliland will become New Palestine for Gazans and West Bankers':As I mentioned. Its a complicated history due to how Gaza was formed without input from the people that lived there. Hamas is not the good guys and depending on who us leadership in Israel neither are they. You have multiple groups all trying to have control over the same land. Sometimes Israel leaves Gaza alone, sometimes they don't. It's not a black and white issue.
It doesn't matter if another country is willing to take refugees. The problem here is that it would be genocide, relocation is still genocide. The Gaza Strip is the home for over a million palastinians. It will not solve anything to move the people, because the people would just return to retake the land again.How would you interpret this? Its consistent with Trump's depopulation of Gaza, and rebuilding it as an Israeli development, "Club Gaza". Evidently, Somaliland will become New Palestine for Gazans and West Bankers':
![]()
Somaliland does not rule out absorption of Gazan residents - KAN
US and Israeli officials reportedly reached out to officials of three East African governments to discuss the potential transfer of displaced Gazan Palestinians.www.jpost.com
4 For Gaza shall be forsaken, And Ashkelon desolate; They shall drive out Ashdod at noonday, And Ekron shall be uprooted.
5 Woe to the inhabitants of the seacoast, The nation of the Cherethites! The word of the LORD is against you, O Canaan, land of the Philistines: "I will destroy you; So there shall be no inhabitant."
6 The seacoast shall be pastures, With shelters for shepherds and folds for flocks.
7 The coast shall be for the remnant of the house of Judah; They shall feed their flocks there; In the houses of Ashkelon they shall lie down at evening. For the LORD their God will intervene for them, And return their captives.
(Zeph. 2:4-7 NKJ)
The first requirement of "genocide" is "cide", killing. Relocation is not killing, therefore not "genoCIDE".It doesn't matter if another country is willing to take refugees. The problem here is that it would be genocide, relocation is still genocide. The Gaza Strip is the home for over a million palastinians. It will not solve anything to move the people, because the people would just return to retake the land again.
No, you should look up the definition of Genocide. It's the removal of an ethnic group. Considering the point if the current operation is to remove all the people of Gaza, it is genocide. It was debatable up until it was outright stated that the goal was to remove the people. It also doesn't help when there was another military bombing killing another 400 people.The first requirement of "genocide" is "cide", killing. Relocation is not killing, therefore not "genoCIDE".
Yeah, that's genocide. This is not a defense of the actions of past people.It will solve everything to do as all Middle Easten countries historically do, move the enemy of your people out when you move in.
Why exactly do the people have to move. Why is Israel's wishes more important then there wishes?They can continue hating Jews, Christians, unbelievers to their heart's content, in Somaliland. They would love it, have their "Death to America" celebrations in a wonderful land filled with like mind and spirit people.
genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion, or race. The term, derived from the Greek genos (“race,” “tribe,” or “nation”) and the Latin cide (“killing”), was coined by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-born jurist who served as an adviser to the U.S. Department of War during World War II.-Encyclopedia Britanica.No, you should look up the definition of Genocide. It's the removal of an ethnic group. Considering the point if the current operation is to remove all the people of Gaza, it is genocide. It was debatable up until it was outright stated that the goal was to remove the people. It also doesn't help when there was another military bombing killing another 400 people.
Yeah, that's genocide. This is not a defense of the actions of past people.
Why exactly do the people have to move. Why is Israel's wishes more important then there wishes?
Yesh, the ethnic population of Gaza. The Palestinians who are muslim. So race, religion, and nationality.genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion, or race.
I asked you why Israel or our government has the right to tha Gaza Strip? You don't want to answer that.This is why left and right cannot discuss disagreements, the left redefines words to suit their agenda. Truth is relative to the needs of the moment, not anything factual or real.
I also hold that Hamas wants to so genocide against Israel.When Israel defends itself it is genocide,
Considering I am not that person, we can continue.I can't discuss ideas with people who change the meaning of words, calling men women, terrorism liberation, etc.
No, it's because her.argument doesn't address the extremely complicated situation of Gaza and Israel., you evaded the Palestinian woman's argument completely, because it is light.