[__ Science __ ] Theistic Evolution: A Response to Wayne Grudem, Making the Same Errors He Opposes in Others

[AIG.com]

Grudem is making the same biblical and theological errors that theistic evolutionists make. To be biblically consistent, he must abandon his old-earth position.

Continue reading...

 

[Truthfrees]

Grudem is making the same biblical and theological errors that theistic evolutionists make. To be biblically consistent, he must abandon his old-earth position.

Continue reading...

Natural selection and mutations produce very limited changes to organisms and lack the creative power to generate new genetic information to change one kind of creature into another (for example, a reptile into a bird or a robin into a hummingbird or an ape into a human).

Continue reading...

great article - thanks

 

[Barbarian]

When we look at the genetic information between humans and other apes, we find that mutation and new genetic information is indeed the difference. Since it's been demonstrated that all new mutations produce new genetic information in a population, that hypothesis is confirmed.

 

[Truthfrees]

The section of chapters refuting the supposed science behind theistic evolution shows that there are massive scientific problems with chemical evolution scenarios (that is, life evolving from non-living matter by natural physical and chemical processes). This section also explains that the genetic information encoded in the DNA of every microbe, plant, animal, and human could only come from an intelligent mind. It could not be produced by undirected natural processes as theistic (and atheistic) evolutionists imagine and dogmatically claim.

Continue reading...

amen

 

[Barbarian]

AIG.com said:

The section of chapters refuting the supposed science behind theistic evolution shows that there are massive scientific problems with chemical evolution scenarios (that is, life evolving from non-living matter by natural physical and chemical processes).

Like many creationists, AIG confuses evolution with the origin of life. Hence the above. Biological evolution makes no claims about the origin of life. It merely describes how populations change over time. Even Darwin just assumed that God created the first living things.

Yet we constantly see foolish people trying to use "evolution" as a synonym for "science." That's not how it is.