Which Bible Can We Trust?

[AKJVReader]

The TEXTUS RECEPTUS, original Greek text from which the Authorized King James Bible was translated, has been the target of textual critics since 1611. Yet copies of it substantially exist today without error. This is the Bible you can trust. All this talk about older and more dependable manuscripts, like the theory of evolution, hangs upon an UNPROVEN HYPOTHESIS.

HERE'S THE ACID TEST
Any version of the Bible which omits Acts 8:37, or "Through His blood," in Col. 1:14, evidently has for its foundation a corrupted manuscript. This corruption can be traced to 200 A.D., when there lived one of the world's foremost theologians whose name was Origen. Being a TEXTUAL CRITIC, he is supposed to have corrected numerous portions of the sacred manuscripts. Evidence to the contrary shows that he changed them to agree with his own human philosophy of mystical and allegorical ideas. Thus certain original MSS. became corrupt and it is evidently from this source the revised Bibles of this generation have come. Read pages 900-902, Vol. 16, 1936 edition Encyclopedia Britannica and you will see that Origen taught the "LOGOS" is "KTISMA," meaning the Lord Jesus Christ is a created being. Thus, he could easily omit Acts 8:37 and other texts which testify to Christ's deity.

Please read this before replying:

Which Bible Can We Trust?

 

[Igor]

There was a recent thread about this here:
http://www.christianforums.net/f17/king-james-only-31181/

You might want to check it out and revive it.

 

[farouk]

Are verses cited there from the Greek? or do they originate from the Latin?

 

[AKJVReader]

The Authorized King James Bible is based on Hebrew and Greek texts, not Latin texts, i will look for the other thread but please read the link i provided above.

 

[farouk]

The Authorized King James Bible is based on Hebrew and Greek texts, not Latin texts, i will look for the other thread but please read the link i provided above.

AKJVR:

I looked at the link, but you might want to check whether the verses got into the Textus Receptus via the continuing influence of the Latin Vulgate, rather than principally from a Greek manuscript source.

(I appreciate and use the King James, too, by the way.)