Search results

It comes up in part 2 of this article I wrote. http://z13.invisionfree.com/BlogMithrandirOlorin/index.php?showtopic=30

What's also intresting is the 17th of Heshvan 2 days latter is the day the Flood started according to Genesis 7.

I will only be certain of his Identity when he performs the abomination of Desolation. I do suspect there will be decoy Antichrists during the first half of the Tribulation.

I know know that the Antichrist does appear first.

I'm not entirely certain the exact nature of who or what this individual will be. The first issue thought is are those 3 passages referring to the same person? The Olivite Discourse assured us the "Abomination of Desolation" which Antiochus Epiphanies performed will happen again, that tells us...

People use a word to describe something the Bible never it to describe, and then people act like pointing out that misuse of the word disproves the existence of the thing they where describing with it. That's my problem here. There is clearly a "Man of Sin" and "Son of Perdition" in 2nd...

The reason I try to avoid using the term "Antichrist" is to avoid people going about what Johns' Epistles say, the "Spirit of Antichrist" from John's Epistles I think is more relevant to the 2nd Beast then the First actually. There clearly an individual coming villain who rule the world, who...

I've written it. I believe Christians should celebrate Jewish holidays, and in general use the Hebrew Calender. Not just because we believe in the Hebrew Bible, all of them also have New Testament significance. The relevance of the Passover season (Passover being the Crucifixion, First...

People love to take to take that part of Galatians out of context. The Son of Hagar did still have an inheritance.

You can't argue no Rapture because it's clearly described.

I personally believe ever Jewish Holiday also has New Testament significance, the Passover-Pentecost season's holidays are well known, I'm currently writing an article about the rest. Purim is the only one I haven't figured out for certain yet, but right now my hypothesis is that it might make...

Show me where in Jospehus it says Titus entered the Temple And claimed to be Divine, that's not there. Here is the Historical account http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/war-6.htm Titus does not make any kind of speech until the Temple was already destroyed, and even then he does not claim...

The Rapture and Second Coming are separate event, contrary to some people's opinions that's true even in a post-Trib model, the Marriage of the Bride and Bridegroom happens in-between.

The Trumpets are the first half of the Tribulation

The message to laodicea clearly references the city haven't been recently destroyed and rebuilt, the rebuilding happened under Domitian. Cite me the historical documentation of that? Titus most certainly did not claim divinity when he wasn't even Emperor yet. His father wouldn't have stood...

The Temple is clearly part of the end Time Scenario according to John, written after the Temple was destroyed already. If you want to build doctrine on saying Titus did that, your going to need historical documentation that he did.

No, the 2nd Beast convinces people to worship the 1st.

No, Titus did not do that.

Paul says it will happen, therefore it will happen, Period.

Irrelevant to the fact that it will be rebuilt and The Little Horn will declare himself God there.