[_ Old Earth _] Creationist vs evolutionist, whos the fool?

[Asimov]

Wrong. TOE does not, because it's biology.

: So now it's biology again,huh?
Don't you ever learn?
First you claim TOE is this,then you claim it's that.
You just can't stick to any one story can you?
You try to use TOE to back up TOE but you can't
so you add more stuff to it that make just as much
non-sense if not more than the tales you told before.
TOE cannot even back itself up with TOE,much less
anything else.

Please comprise a list of what I have claimed TOE is, blue, and list the inconsistency.

 

[Asimov]

I don't recall her saying that You are a "bad person", she just strongly disagreed. As for a source, please study the works of Ken Ham, you'll find all the sources for what I say there. I would also like to point out, I've asked for a source one time, and never received it. Why should I give a curtiousy I do not receive in return.

A source on what? Ask an ye shall receive. I don't recall you asking for one though, sorry if I missed it.

About Ken Ham, you can study his findings on http://www.answersingenesis.org. There's a book I borrowed from the campus library which will also provided you with yet another source, unfortunately I can't remember it's exact title so I'll post that tommorrow.

Yes, I've studied ken ham. He should change his name to Ken Hack.

 

[Blazin Bones]

http://www.answersingenesis.org[/url]. There's a book I borrowed from the campus library which will also provided you with yet another source, unfortunately I can't remember it's exact title so I'll post that tommorrow.

Yes, I've studied ken ham. He should change his name to Ken Hack.

[/quote:e2ff7]

Tua, I asked keebs for the source, back in the "new start" thread. If I asked you, I know you would have given me three, you are very proper in that respect, and I appreciate that. As for Ken Ham, You do Realize that he has beaten every Evolutionist he has ever debated. You may not like him, but he knows his stuff.

 

[Asimov]

http://www.answersingenesis.org[/url]. There's a book I borrowed from the campus library which will also provided you with yet another source, unfortunately I can't remember it's exact title so I'll post that tommorrow.

Yes, I've studied ken ham. He should change his name to Ken Hack.

[/quote:1fc60]

Tua, I asked keebs for the source, back in the "new start" thread. If I asked you, I know you would have given me three, you are very proper in that respect, and I appreciate that. As for Ken Ham, You do Realize that he has beaten every Evolutionist he has ever debated. You may not like him, but he knows his stuff.[/quote:1fc60]

Debate is a sport, Brutus. It's not a method of discerning the Truth. I've read many many articles by Ken Ham....and they are all very misguided.

 

[Guest]

Tua, I asked keebs for the source, back in the "new start" thread. If I asked you, I know you would have given me three, you are very proper in that respect, and I appreciate that. As for Ken Ham, You do Realize that he has beaten every Evolutionist he has ever debated. You may not like him, but he knows his stuff.

: I agree with you Brutus.

 

[Asimov]

Tua, I asked keebs for the source, back in the "new start" thread. If I asked you, I know you would have given me three, you are very proper in that respect, and I appreciate that. As for Ken Ham, You do Realize that he has beaten every Evolutionist he has ever debated. You may not like him, but he knows his stuff.

: I agree with you Brutus.

Of course you do.

 

[Blazin Bones]

Well, the articles are only misguided in your opinion, while in fact, many things he argues have been proven true. You only except his articles as misguided because they hurt evolutions case. He is not misguided at all, he is guided by God. God doesn't steer anyone the wrong way. 8-)

 

[keebs]

I asked keebs for the source

Everytime you asked for a source I gave you one. Post a quote where you asked for a source and didn't get one.

 

[Blazin Bones]

You gave me examples, and something that was completly irrelevant to the topic.

 

[keebs]

Quote?

 

[Blazin Bones]

I did back in New Start. Go back and read. Watch your temper keebs.

 

[keebs]

You asked for a source for a case where isolation has caused speciation. I gave:

Five new species of cichlid fishes have formed since they were isolated in Lake Nagubago some 4000 years ago.
Source: Mayr, E., 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. p. 348

If this is not the source reply adequately for, then say so.

 

[Guest]

Please comprise a list of what I have claimed TOE is, blue, and list the inconsistency.

Are you serious? That would take forever to try to get down.
I'd have to live here,no offense intended,but it's so hard to know where
you are coming from. Just when I think I have an idea of what you mean
you change on me.

 

[Blazin Bones]

You asked for a source for a case where isolation has caused speciation. I gave:

Five new species of cichlid fishes have formed since they were isolated in Lake Nagubago some 4000 years ago.
Source: Mayr, E., 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. p. 348

If this is not the source reply adequately for, then say so.

keebs you know what I've said about your quote, go back and read.

 

[Blazin Bones]

I left, does that explain it enough.

 

[keebs]

I still don't understand how it is inadequate...

 

[Gary]

http://www.answersingenesis.org[/url]. There's a book I borrowed from the campus library which will also provided you with yet another source, unfortunately I can't remember it's exact title so I'll post that tommorrow.

Yes, I've studied ken ham. He should change his name to Ken Hack.

[/quote:2a281]

Tua, I asked keebs for the source, back in the "new start" thread. If I asked you, I know you would have given me three, you are very proper in that respect, and I appreciate that. As for Ken Ham, You do Realize that he has beaten every Evolutionist he has ever debated. You may not like him, but he knows his stuff.[/quote:2a281]

Debate is a sport, Brutus. It's not a method of discerning the Truth. I've read many many articles by Ken Ham....and they are all very misguided.[/quote:2a281]

LOL.... watch the "sport"....

Current score: BL=3, Tua=0

Darck Marck wrote: So, how would you rate yourself (Tua) and BL?

Tua: I think we've both come up with good points.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coach: So how did you think you are playing son?

Son: I think we both came up with good points

Coach: ...but you are LOSING 3:0 (6:4, 6:2 and 6:0)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.christianforums.net/viewtopi ... 132#116132

.

 

[Asimov]

Gary, honestly....is that all you do?

For a Christian, you have a serious problem with judging others. Not once have I said an unkind word to BL, I am trying to be courteous, but it is very difficult when people are making such rude and belittling comments.

 

[Sophistress]

Gary Bee, I have concluded, is a very nasty individual. He, I believe, has some sort of complex in which he must insult people at every step of the way. Just make sure to note his actions down in your book of Why I am not a Christian.

 

[Gary]

... another hit-and-run Heathen?

Seems like your normal tactic
http://www.christianforums.net/viewtopi ... &start=120



P.S. Why not comment on the debate rather than the commentators?