I read Reese's Chronological Bible, and here is my opinion on it.
There are parts of it that he arbitrarily switches between: (1) splitting up books and placing verses where the content is chronological, such as John 1:1 next to Gen. 1:1, and (2) Placing books in order of when they were written, such as Job is the first book.
I didn't like it because of that, and I really want a Bible in which they are in order of when they were written (only). I don't like the idea of John 1:1 taken out of the context of John and put at Gen. 1:1 (and many other verses cut like that). I could explain why, but it would take a long time. Instead, the next best thing is to write the approx. dates of when they were written at the beginning of the book, or read a study Bible with commentary that has that info. The only problem with that is that there are varying opinions as to when some of the books were written.
I did like the fact that he placed the Kings/Chronicles side by side to show the parallel history, that did help some. But it's in KJV and harder to read than modern versions.
Besides this, there is only 1 other Chronological I've read, which is a "Gospel Harmony" book "Jesus Christ The Greatest Life" by Johnston M. Cheney and Stanley Ellisen Th.D. It is a compilation of all the verses of Mat.-John in chron. order (in their opinion). Each statement has the references where it appears in the gospels. I like this one because it's a study book with notes, pictures, and maps in the margins. Each year has a page where there is a month-by-month event summary of what Jesus did. The only issue I see is the controversial idea that Jesus' ministry was 4 years instead of the widely accepted 3½. They explain this in the intro. Not sure if it's still available.
TD