Search results

If you read thru this thread, I don't understand what you're talking about.

Read Malachi chapter two.

I see things haven't changed around brother.

Disagree on what?

All you're concerned with is your writing skills. I might not know how to write but I know how to read. The fact and the point of this thread is that Malachi chapter two proves the Maccabees did forsake the covenant after Antiochus the III the Great ended the high priest line of Aaron, which...

Why would I waste my time giving you the facts when you refuse to stop speculating. I've been thru this before. I know your type.

Keep doubling down in your errors. It's why denominational Christianity will never be able to interpret the scriptures correctly, because they choose to use speculations as doctrine, instead of facts.

I don't know where you get your information from, but the temple and city were only destroyed twice, when Israel went into Babylon and in 68 A.D. And the book of Malachi could not have been written during the reign of the Persians because it is the last book of the old testament and chapter 3...

There's no connection between Matthew 24's mentioning of a famine and the scales other than your speculation that the scales represent famine. Nothing! And nowhere in the scriptures does it say scales represent famine, which means you're adding to the scriptures - which, in my eyes, is a grave sin.

I quoted you! "The pair of scales means famine," which is unscripted.

You can say what you want. The proof is there, Malachi chapter two. Israel's sacrifices and offerings were cursed before the birth of Christ because they had forsaken the covenant with the high priest. BLESSINGS WERE CURSED, BEFORE THE NEW TESTAMENT BEGAN. THE COVENANT WITH LEVI CORRUPTED...

I admit the verse might seem out of context, but the title still fits because the Maccabees did claim to have established the vision of the abomination of desolation and did claim to have fulfilled it by cleansing the temple 3 /2 years after they claimed it was committed. And who's to say the...

And who doesn't know that?

Your conclusions on the color of the horsemen' horses is unscripted. For example: "The pair of scales means famine..." is speculation. Come on, man.

The wise will see the contradiction. Christ partook of cursed sacrifices? Christ participated in a corrupt covenant? That means Christ was cut off when you claimed he made offerings.

I have to judge you because you're speculating. You can't prove an iota of anything you're saying. And where are the sources from scripture?

Talk about going off topic. I've learned my lesson with individuals like you. That's why I don't argue anymore. I just simply state the fact and take my blows. I know the wise will understand. And, btw, check out my new thread, "The Robbers of Israel,"since you think you know everything about...

There's only one reason I'm back on these sites and it's to post this critical information that I've recently discovered. For years, even for centuries, the doctrine of the Maccabees cleansing the temple and establishing the vision of the temple defilement has been accepted by the Church and...

Where do you people get this information from? Nothing you've posted here can be proven in a court of law because you're speculating! You're doing more of a disservice to the Christian doctrine than service.

Sinthesis 12:4-18!