Search results

Not really, if that was the only other covenant they had been a part of

Seventh-Day Adventism is nothing but Jewish legalism hiding behind Jesus. They hold to Jewish dietary laws and Jewish ritual Saturday worship.

Likely the Mosaic/Davidic Covenant, since that was the Covenant Jews were under at that time

I'm trying to figure out why some people keep referring to "old covenant" when there are five distinct covenants in the Old Testament. As I said in my first post: You do realize, don't you, that there are six covenants in the Bible? Adamic (established with Adam ) Noahic (established with Noah...

Edited by Staff to retain some civility.

If these people want to call my Church a false Church then I have the right to respond. So why did you delete my post? Or is it okay for protestants only to go off topic?

I hate to tell you this but the3 Bible encourages large families. Children are Biblically considered a blessing, and a man with many children is said to be doubly blessed. Good grief, read your Bibles. The Catholic Church went through the trouble to actually give you the Bible - the least you...

I'd say that pretty much sums it up. Perhaps "gobbldygook" would be more apt. To take the 2000 year old Church established by Christ which consists of 75% of the world's Christians, and try to compare it to a false evil ideology like Islam, is at the same time nonsense, offensive, ridiculous...

Thanks Interesting. Thank you.

Hunting the Whore of Babylon source: http://www.catholic.com/library/Hunting ... abylon.asp Some anti-Catholics claim the Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon of Revelation 17 and 18. Dave Hunt, in his 1994 book, A Woman Rides the Beast, presents nine arguments to try to prove this. His...

Sorry if I misread you. Perhaps my last post will clarify my reasoning

Hmmm. We are not merely kinsmen to Jesus, we truly are part of his family, but by adoption to the Father and not by blood. Let me quote my first post: NOW let add this to my first post: Up through to the time of Jesus, the people of God were actually related by blood. Oh, yes, occassional...

That may be true for animals that have no spirit, but not for man. As I stated previously: In Latin, the word for soul is "anima", from which we get the word animation. The soul is the animating force of the body. Actually, all living things have souls since their bodies are all animated. But...

Yup. In what context are you referring to them?

And after little rant and rave, I am supposed to care about reading the rest of your post?

My issue is that in man there is no differece between soul and spirit. Of COURSE there is a difference between body and soul. Maybe I was not clear.

The Blessed Virgin Why? Oh, I could write a book on why

Actually, I believe man's soul is a spiritual soul, that there is no difference between soul and spirit, despite that reference from Paul. In Latin, the word for soul is "anima", from which we get the word animation. The soul is the animating force of the body. Actually, all living things have...

I disagree. Your whole POV is based on what the Jewish understanding of "soul" is. My point is: Who cares what it is? They are wrong about Jesus, wrong about Mary, wrong about the Trinity, wrong about the Resurection, wrong about..... ...well, I think you get the point. What matters is...

Non-sequitor. Jesus IS God. The Father is God. The Son is God. The Holy Spirit is God.