This thread is re-opened.
However, there shall be NO debate involved. Nor shall there be any negative comments made about other members.
We MUST remember this is a Christian forum. We each know how to behave as a Christian in our off-line lives. It's a necessity that we definitely behave as Christians in this 'anonymous' form of communication online.
I always have to remind myself that there are 35,000+ Christian denominations. I doubt seriously that Jesus is going to say "‘I never knew you; depart from Me" (Matt. 7:23) to anyone because the fine points of that person's theology were wrong. This is another way (in my view) that we fail to acknowledge how radically liberating Jesus' message really is - salvation isn't just for the few who get everything right in terms of theology; it's for those who acknowledge their need for salvation. Convincing myself that only I am right, or that it is my mission to harangue others into my "correct" way of thinking, is another way to drain the joy out of the Christian walk. I am far from being (as one example among many possible ones) a Young Earth Creationist, yet I admit they
could be right, at least some evidence supports their position, and many serious scholars hold this position.
One very enlightening experience for me, which I have mentioned on another thread, has been reading many of the scholarly "multi-view" books (
Four Views of the Atonement was my first). They show that Christianity can accommodate
extremely diverse views even on core doctrines such as the Atonement and that very serious Christian thinkers can hold
extremely different views. I seldom finish one of the essays without thinking, "Yeah, that's a reasonable position. I can see how he arrived at it." Then I move on to an opposing essay and think the same thing.
Insofar as the topic of this thread is concerned, it does seem
to me that excessive dwelling on one's "loathsomeness" is unnecessary and potentially unhealthy, but there are undoubtedly some for whom this is the most effective way to stay on the path. One biography states of C. H. Macintosh, "It is said that he had a mild and gracious spirit, avoiding conflict as far as possible, and that he had a deep devotion and love not only for Christian believers, but for lost souls." Surely this is what really counts.
There must be an extremely fine line between "discussion" and "debate," and I'm not sure I could distinguish one from the other. But it is probably in disparaging others and their views that we cross the line. I may be a "New Member" here, but I am
extremely experienced on Internet forums, and they do seem to have a capacity to bring out the worst in many people (including me, although hopefully less now than 15 years ago). "I disagree because ..." to me is debate. "You are a dope and your position is ridiculous because ..." to me goes beyond debate. I can tell you that in legal filings and arguments - the ultimate arena where winning is all that counts - judges are very sensitive to disparagement and personal attacks and regard them as a tacit admission that your own position is weak.