So he asserts the "universe is spirit" and that it "makes sense"
Makes sense how? Under what framework? What pre existing worldview does the person have that gets him to think that belief "makes sense"?
Jesus' resurrection may make sense to a Christian, but not to a person who thinks, "death is it, no coming back".
But then why do we distinguish "physical and spiritual" if the universe "is spirit"?
What does the guy mean by the term "spiritual"?
He said "I think [spirit] is love." But what does he mean by the term "spiritual"? I want to know.
There is a clear and noticable distinction between physical and supernatural.
His belief is similar to panthiesm. Nowhere does his asserted belief come from the Bible. It's something he believed based on a faulty idea.
He already stated he believed in Abiogenesis, which is impossible under current physics, unproven, and debunked+debunkable.
Error gives rise to error. A bad tree bears bad fruit just like the Bible says.
And logically, non life cannot give rise to life.
If "the universe is spirit" then, according to what the guy has said, it is love.
So is love another term for spirit, or is spirit another term for love, under his view?
Clearly, the universe is NOT love, God is. Violence happens daily, stars explode, the amount of usable energy goes down drastically every day, and more.
"Would God want" The universe is not supernatural. It is physical, and is thus inferior in power and in capability to the Supernatural.
Definitely it's weaker and less than God.
How will you defend the guy's belief?
Or do you not believe the video, but you simply are sharing it?
