[__ Science __ ] A Humble Attempt To Reconcile God and Science Through Mathematics

Just_Michael

"Life! Don't talk to me about life."
Member
Joined
May 12, 2023
Messages
67
Reaction score
56
Since I am limited to 10,000 words, and my post wasn't near that threshold (but the site said it was), I'm going to post images instead.

I would love any feedback, questions, comments, or discussions on this topic as I think I have a rather novel and truly unique take on science and God that permits God's existence and the agency of His power while simultaneously upholding physical laws and constraints. God and science doesn't have to be either/or; God is the science, and His creation is there to foster human spiritual evolution to create beings with free will that will still act in perfect accordance with His will. Free will, too, is not eliminated in a deterministic universe because God set the probabilities at the moment of creation, and we have free will to choose which path to follow: God's (order, light, harmony) or Satan's (chaos, entropy, noise).

Hidden In Him

temp-Image-Nh-PTno.avif
temp-Image8ud2u7.avif

temp-Imageslqtx-U.avif
temp-Imagemabclo.avif

temp-Imageytaxz-N.avif
temp-Image-JDe-LOf.avif

temp-Imageew-Ftr-P.avif
temp-Imagey-L9z6-K.avif

temp-Image-UMw27-C.avif

I apologize for the wall of images, but this was the only way I could include the full text of it all.
 
Since I am limited to 10,000 words, and my post wasn't near that threshold (but the site said it was), I'm going to post images instead.

I would love any feedback, questions, comments, or discussions on this topic as I think I have a rather novel and truly unique take on science and God that permits God's existence and the agency of His power while simultaneously upholding physical laws and constraints. God and science doesn't have to be either/or; God is the science, and His creation is there to foster human spiritual evolution to create beings with free will that will still act in perfect accordance with His will. Free will, too, is not eliminated in a deterministic universe because God set the probabilities at the moment of creation, and we have free will to choose which path to follow: God's (order, light, harmony) or Satan's (chaos, entropy, noise).

Hidden In Him

temp-Image-Nh-PTno.avif
temp-Image8ud2u7.avif

temp-Imageslqtx-U.avif
temp-Imagemabclo.avif

temp-Imageytaxz-N.avif
temp-Image-JDe-LOf.avif

temp-Imageew-Ftr-P.avif
temp-Imagey-L9z6-K.avif

temp-Image-UMw27-C.avif

I apologize for the wall of images, but this was the only way I could include the full text of it all.

Greetings, Just Michael.

Good seeing you again. This appears to be a little beyond my pay grade, as I'm not as heavy into the scientific side of things as others are. But there may be someone else who would like to respond.

Blessings, and hope you are well.
Hidden
 
Sorry about that--life has sort of happened. My second daughter was born on the 27th (Aislinn Quinn) and we've been busy trying to pay off our debt and whatnot.

This is a pet project, really, that I've been sort of revising as I go.

The tl;dr is, I think I've discovered scientific proof of God, or as close as we can come to it, all without violating any of Christian tenets or scripture. So, hopefully, we can get an actual scientist in here. lol
 
Since I am limited to 10,000 words, and my post wasn't near that threshold (but the site said it was), I'm going to post images instead.

I would love any feedback, questions, comments, or discussions on this topic as I think I have a rather novel and truly unique take on science and God that permits God's existence and the agency of His power while simultaneously upholding physical laws and constraints. God and science doesn't have to be either/or; God is the science, and His creation is there to foster human spiritual evolution to create beings with free will that will still act in perfect accordance with His will. Free will, too, is not eliminated in a deterministic universe because God set the probabilities at the moment of creation, and we have free will to choose which path to follow: God's (order, light, harmony) or Satan's (chaos, entropy, noise).

Hidden In Him

temp-Image-Nh-PTno.avif
temp-Image8ud2u7.avif

temp-Imageslqtx-U.avif
temp-Imagemabclo.avif

temp-Imageytaxz-N.avif
temp-Image-JDe-LOf.avif

temp-Imageew-Ftr-P.avif
temp-Imagey-L9z6-K.avif

temp-Image-UMw27-C.avif

I apologize for the wall of images, but this was the only way I could include the full text of it all.
Just for future reference, it's a 10,000 character, not word, limit. I hit it all the time and have to break posts into two or three.
 
Just for future reference, it's a 10,000 character, not word, limit. I hit it all the time and have to break posts into two or three.
Yeah, that's what I meant to say. After attempting to post this post three times, I was more focused on actually getting it to post at all.
 
I have a rather novel and truly unique take on science and God that permits God's existence and the agency of His power while simultaneously upholding physical laws and constraints. God and science doesn't have to be either/or; God is the science, and His creation is there to foster human spiritual evolution to create beings with free will that will still act in perfect accordance with His will.

Where do Christians say it is either God or Science?

While there is controversy over creation or evolution no Christian, I'm aware of actually denies science.

May I suggest that you submit your thesis to agencies like answer in genesis or creation.com.
 
Oh, I don't believe that it must be either/or. To me, the beauty of the universe is that it allows for a Creator, and the fact that there are weird coincidences like the fine-tuning seems to hint at some kind of external force tinkering with the universe. I've tweaked it a bit to give a more mathematical framework for the null interval hypothesis and include a bit about the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

I've emailed creation.com (an Australian site, apparently?), and I'm making an account on AnswersInGenesis to submit it there. I mean, I've had a little input from the scientific community over on Discord, but nothing that would render this hypothesis false. I'd be very happy, though, if it was used in apologetics, or contributed something to it.
 
Back
Top