If this topic has been discussed before, I apologize. (and if so, could someone post a link to that thread?) For centuries, Christians and non-Christians have been debating whether the Bible is divinely inspired or not. The skeptics claim that the Bible was no more divinely inspired than any other book; that it is limited to the knowledge of the primitive men who wrote it. Christians claim that the Bible was inspired by the almighty Creator of the universe. How do we know which side is right? In my opinion, one way (of many) of determining this is to see if the Bible speaks with accuracy about something that could not possibly have been known at that time (except by divine inspiration). Check this out:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2204
So to everyone on this forum: what's your on this? Is this something we can offer the skeptics as legitimate proof of the accuracy and divine inspiration of the Bible? If not, then why?
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2204
The faith of each individual Christian rests upon the bedrock foundation of the Bible’s inspiration. If the Bible is of human origin, then it logically follows that the facts and doctrines found therein are only as reliable as human knowledge can be. However, if the biblical records were provided by the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:20-21), then we have every reason to believe that the facts and doctrines recorded therein are free of those imperfections and blemishes that characterize all purely human efforts…..
.....A close examination of the Bible reveals startling proof of its inspiration…..Sometimes the proof comes in the form of scientific facts that were placed in the divine record hundreds or thousands of years before they were known to the modern scientific mind. This brief article deals with…..an important piece of scientific foreknowledge found with the biblical text that was completely unknown to man until fairly recently.
In Genesis 17:12, God specifically directed Abraham to circumcise newborn males on the eighth day. Why the eighth day? In 1935, professor H. Dam proposed the name “vitamin K†for the factor in foods that helped prevent hemorrhaging in baby chicks. We now know vitamin K is responsible for the production (by the liver) of the element known as prothrombin. If vitamin K is deficient, there will be a prothrombin deficiency and hemorrhaging may occur. Oddly, it is only on the fifth through the seventh days of the newborn male’s life that vitamin K (produced by bacteria in the intestinal tract) is present in adequate quantities. Vitamin K, coupled with prothrombin, causes blood coagulation, which is important in any surgical procedure. Holt and McIntosh, in their classic work, Holt Pediatrics, observed that a newborn infant has “peculiar susceptibility to bleeding between the second and fifth days of life…. Hemorrhages at this time, though often inconsequential, are sometimes extensive; they may produce serious damage to internal organs, especially to the brain, and cause death from shock and exsanguination†(1953, pp. 125-126). Obviously, then, if vitamin K is not produced in sufficient quantities until days five through seven, it would be wise to postpone any surgery until some time after that. But why did God specify day eight?
On the eighth day, the amount of prothrombin present actually is elevated above one-hundred percent of normalâ€â€and is the only day in the male’s life in which this will be the case under normal conditions. If surgery is to be performed, day eight is the perfect day to do it. Vitamin K and prothrombin levels are at their peak.
Dr. McMillen observed (S.I. McMillen, M.D., in his book, None of These Diseases):
“We should commend the many hundreds of workers who labored at great expense over a number of years to discover that the safest day to perform circumcision is the eighth. Yet, as we congratulate medical science for this recent finding, we can almost hear the leaves of the Bible rustling. They would like to remind us that four thousand years ago, when God initiated circumcision with Abraham….
Abraham did not pick the eighth day after many centuries of trial-and-error experiments. Neither he nor any of his company from the ancient city of Ur in the Chaldees ever had been circumcised. It was a day picked by the Creator of vitamin K (1984, p. 93).â€Â
Moses’ information, as recorded in Genesis 17:12, not only was scientifically accurate, but was years ahead of its time. How did Moses have access to such information? The answer, of course, is provided by the apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 3:16â€â€Ã¢â‚¬Å“Every scripture is inspired of God.â€Â
So to everyone on this forum: what's your on this? Is this something we can offer the skeptics as legitimate proof of the accuracy and divine inspiration of the Bible? If not, then why?