Dave....it is a threat...and it is a promise.....most definetely a warning....and it is most definetly a hopeful reward for the righteous. By the very promise of not being blotted out, is the promise that you will be blotted out if you are unrighteous. The inference of the "blotting out judgment" is the Jewish (not Christian) nature of the book, as the tradition is seen in the previous post I had presented.
I would have to respectfully disagree with you here. I do not see it as a hopeful reward, otherwise the promise would be empty. I also do not see it as a threat. It sounds like it would be a safe assumption that those who do not persevere must have their names removed, but it doesn't say that and to read this into that verse would be contrary to the truth from the rest of scripture.
Rev 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
Ephesians 1:4-5 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
This is a promise to all who are saved. He that overcommeth, we are told earlier in Rev. is one who is saved. One who is saved, is one who He hath chosen in Him before the foundation of the world, predestined according to the good pleasure of His will.
Dave....you (anyone) can't buck 3500 years of tradition in regard to the Book of Life. Print the verse in the above paragraph you are discussing.....there is nothing in the Book of Life verses that could possibly be mistakened for Tree of Life....wouldn't make sense....but there is a lot of revisionism in Christianity. Revisionists try to separate Christianity from Judaism. Not saying you espouse the revisionist agenda, but by suggesting the above indicates you've been exposed to it somewhat.
I understand what you are saying, and you are correct that we need to be careful. I'm not one of those who believes that the KJV is without it's problems in translation. The verse is Revelation 22:19.
KJV
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the
book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
NASB
Rev 22:19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the
tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.
1. The first part indicates that these are not written in the Book of Life.
2. The second part states that the Book of Life has been in existence since the beginning of the world.
The Books have been from the beginning and are adjusted yearly......still are and will be until the end of the Messianic Millennial kingdom period.
Rev. 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder,
whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
I disagree with the second. I don't see the separation in the names written and the 'foundations of the world.' I have not heard anyone who is well studied in the original languages make the claim that there should be separation in that sentence. I'm still looking into it, so if there is something to it, i'll find it, Lord willing.
I'm going over some of it tonight. We'll see what comes out of it all. 8-) Thanks for your reply. If I find anything good i'll let you know.
Peace
Dave