L
Late_Cretaceous
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
http://www.siu.edu/~protocell/.
This is an interesting article about protocells and the origins of cellular life.
Remember, this work is compelling and interesting, but not necessarily accepted by all scientists. There are detractors and competing thoeries.
But that is how science works. It's a big debate, and often there are big egos invovled.
Sometimes promising ideas fall short of expectations. OThertimes, radical ideas are so out there that nobody accepts them at first (like plate techtonics) - then finally they are embraced.
It would be wrong to say that anybody "knows" how life started. It would be equally wrong to say that "we have no clue". I think we have a good idea (just like we have a good idea of how life was for people in the Roman Empire circa 100 ad, but we can never really know for sure)
This is an interesting article about protocells and the origins of cellular life.
Remember, this work is compelling and interesting, but not necessarily accepted by all scientists. There are detractors and competing thoeries.
But that is how science works. It's a big debate, and often there are big egos invovled.
Sometimes promising ideas fall short of expectations. OThertimes, radical ideas are so out there that nobody accepts them at first (like plate techtonics) - then finally they are embraced.
It would be wrong to say that anybody "knows" how life started. It would be equally wrong to say that "we have no clue". I think we have a good idea (just like we have a good idea of how life was for people in the Roman Empire circa 100 ad, but we can never really know for sure)