Atonement said:
So Free, if a Church does not practice Communion, you believe that the person attending the Church should leave the Church? Should the person just leave or should they talk with the Pastor about it first? Figure out why it's not practiced?
As was stated by others, I think it depends on the situation. For instance, a church I once attended didn't practice communion because they wanted it to be done in the home. That church is no longer around, for a variety of reasons, but perhaps the lack of practice of communion was idicative of something more.
If a church teaches that it ought to be done at home and therefore there is no need to do it in church, that is fine, I guess, but communion is something that ought to be done and how do you keep the entire church accountable to that. There will always be people who won't do it at home so they should at least have some opportunity at church.
I would recommend always talking to the pastor if leaving a church for whatever reason, even if it is blatant false teaching.
stray bullet said:
Through most of history and even most of Christianity today, believe that communion is the actual Body and Blood of Jesus Christ. That He did not say, "this is like my Body", but that "this is my Body".
Firstly, similies use "like" or "as" but metaphors don't. Secondly, the interesting thing is that he was alive,
prior to his death no less, when he said that, so they obviously couldn't be his actual body and blood. What do you think of cutting out your eyes and cutting off your hands when they cause you to sin? Was Jesus speaking literally or metaphorically?
jgredline said:
At my Church we do communion the first Sunday of the month. Its never the same. The Pastors change it up everytime so it does not turn into a religious affair.
But even Paul states that it was something passed on to him from Jesus, so there is obviously continuity or similarity there in the way it was practised. I think one of the biggest mistakes of Evangelcalism is the rejection of "tradition" or "religion" based on a false distinction between those ideas and "a personal relationship with Christ". Tradition brings a "rootedness" to Christian belief that ties one to all of Christian history.
Having said all that, I think that Evangelicalism has lightened the meaning and significance all too much. It is for rememberance, that is not in question, but I believe it goes beyond that. Evangelicalism has settled for "Eucharist light".
Just my thoughts.