enlightened
Member
To say that GOD knew Adam would sin, is to say HE tempted Adam by putting something before him that he could not have. This is unjust, which GOD is not. Certainly, it seems to be the case that GOD did do just that because HE forbade Adam from eating the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil; however, i will prove to you that HE did not tempt Adam in any way, not even by the tree forbiddened. GOD tempts no man; and i believe GOD gave Adam every reason not to sin.
Consider: (GENESIS 2)
GOD gave Adam the promise of a life eternal from the Beginning, but Adam would have to sin tio lose it. So once Adam died spiritually the moment the ate the 'forbidden' fruit, which was the promise, he lost his opportunity for eternal life. And since GOD never made mention of another opportunity for an eternal life, and Adam made no attempt to confess or repent of his sin, all that was left for Adam was to die physically, and his soul would go to hell.
By GENESIS 2:9, there were two trees in the center (midst) of the Garden; and by REVELATION 22:1-3, the TREE of LIFE appears as two trees, between which flows the RIVER of LIFE. Since the Garden is eternal, as well as it contents, these 'two' trees are both the TREE of LIFE; therefore, evern though Adam could not eat from one of the trees, he could freely eat from the other. Wherefore then should Adam be tempted to eat a fruit from the forbidden tree (of which there are twelve, each growing in their seasons), when he already had the same fruit on the other tree he could freely eat from? The promise of death was even a great detractor to Adam to not eat the forbidden fruit.
Since the two trees are the same, the forbidden tree was just as pleasant as the other one, their fruits were exactly the same and good to eat, and the forbidden one could not have had some special power to impart some special knowledge of god and evil, because, since both trees were the same, the other tree would have done the same thing too, which is did not. As long as Adam did not eat from the forbidden tree, his conscience told him he was doing good; however, the moment he sinned by eating, his conscience was immediatley convicted of sin (evil): and that is all there was to it. The problem with Adam is that he overthought the simplicity of the promise and decieved himself.
GOD gave Adam a promise of an eternal life, possesssion and benefit of GOD's
Garden, possession and dominion over the earth, a wife, and a perfect body and soul; what then did he put before Adam that Adam could not have, or what was left to keep from Adam? Nothing at all. This is LOVE GOD showed Adam, for GOD provided Adam all things created upon the earth. This is JUST.
So, then, if GOD gave Adam a promise of an eternal life that he could not have, GOD was unjust; or if the two trees in the center of the Garden are differnet in any way, then GOD tempted Adam. This is impossible.
Consider: (GENESIS 2)
GOD gave Adam the promise of a life eternal from the Beginning, but Adam would have to sin tio lose it. So once Adam died spiritually the moment the ate the 'forbidden' fruit, which was the promise, he lost his opportunity for eternal life. And since GOD never made mention of another opportunity for an eternal life, and Adam made no attempt to confess or repent of his sin, all that was left for Adam was to die physically, and his soul would go to hell.
By GENESIS 2:9, there were two trees in the center (midst) of the Garden; and by REVELATION 22:1-3, the TREE of LIFE appears as two trees, between which flows the RIVER of LIFE. Since the Garden is eternal, as well as it contents, these 'two' trees are both the TREE of LIFE; therefore, evern though Adam could not eat from one of the trees, he could freely eat from the other. Wherefore then should Adam be tempted to eat a fruit from the forbidden tree (of which there are twelve, each growing in their seasons), when he already had the same fruit on the other tree he could freely eat from? The promise of death was even a great detractor to Adam to not eat the forbidden fruit.
Since the two trees are the same, the forbidden tree was just as pleasant as the other one, their fruits were exactly the same and good to eat, and the forbidden one could not have had some special power to impart some special knowledge of god and evil, because, since both trees were the same, the other tree would have done the same thing too, which is did not. As long as Adam did not eat from the forbidden tree, his conscience told him he was doing good; however, the moment he sinned by eating, his conscience was immediatley convicted of sin (evil): and that is all there was to it. The problem with Adam is that he overthought the simplicity of the promise and decieved himself.
GOD gave Adam a promise of an eternal life, possesssion and benefit of GOD's
Garden, possession and dominion over the earth, a wife, and a perfect body and soul; what then did he put before Adam that Adam could not have, or what was left to keep from Adam? Nothing at all. This is LOVE GOD showed Adam, for GOD provided Adam all things created upon the earth. This is JUST.
So, then, if GOD gave Adam a promise of an eternal life that he could not have, GOD was unjust; or if the two trees in the center of the Garden are differnet in any way, then GOD tempted Adam. This is impossible.