Did the revision

[ronniechoate34]

that took place in 1881 divide the church? I realize that the 1611 AV received a lukewarm reception but it caught on pretty quickly. I don't believe that's been the case with the 1881 revision. Also I have another question for everyone. What does this mean?


Re:10:1: And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire:
Re:10:2: And he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth,
Re:10:3: And cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth: and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices.
Re:10:4: And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.
Re:10:5: And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven,
Re:10:6: And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer:
Re:10:7: But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.
Re:10:8: And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
Re:10:9: And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.
Re:10:10: And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.
Re:10:11: And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.


I don't have any straight answer for this at all. What is this book? Is it the cabala? It can't be the Gospel of Jesus Christ and our present Bible. What do you guys think? Is it the "new age" bible. It could be but I don't know that. It maybe that the book represents all false doctrines that have sprang up throughout the ages. Or maybe God was putting His Words into John.


I'd like to know what you guys think.

 

[JudaicChristian]

The book of Revelation is written by the disciple John. What you are reading is a parable to a future event. I study parables and prophecies. Would you like the interpretation?

 

[ronniechoate34]

Yes, I would very much like to hear what you have to say. Thank you.

 

[veteran]

Why would you think that Book is anything other than The Word of God? Where does that idea that it could have been some "new age" bible come from anyway? I'm aware that some occultists treat Christ's Book of Revelation like it could not have come from His Apostle John, but from some pagan writer. That belief reveals how closed off Christ's Book of Revelation is to pagan's understanding, as it should be because of what they choose to follow.

 

[Vic C.]

Hi Ronnie,

I'm pretty much in agreement to Vet.

The book is the written word. The reference to eating it up and it being sweet to the lips but sour to the belly is this:

eating it up is what we do when we read and study God's word.

Some parts of it are very sweet and some not so sweet; sour.