francisdesales said:
I am unaware of any passage that lists the books that ARE Scripture. Can you point this Catholic to that particular verse, please???
D46 said:
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
That tells me that Scripture is God breathed, but it doesn't tell me how to identify Scripture! It doesn't tell me that Philemon is Scriptures! The individual books of the Bible separately don't identify themselves as God-breathed with only a few exceptions.
D46 said:
Would you agree that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were inspired of God?
Would you agree that Paul, who wrote 2/3rds of the New Testament, was inspired of God? So was Jude and Peter.
Of course, based on the authority of the Church's witness, I believe that these books are inspired by God. They do NOT testify to themselves, nor CAN they!
Let's be honest. You are presuming that the Bible is the Word of God, but this is based on what SOMEONE ELSE has told you! In the end, we rely on the witness of someone else to tell us that the Bible IS God's Word. Now, if the person who tells you the Bible is God's Word is fallible, then you CANNOT KNOW if that person might be wrong! Men make mistakes.
Only through an infallible witness can we know that the Bible is complete and completely encompasses Scriptural writings. None are left out, and all that ARE listed belong. This can only come from an authority guided by God. And God GAVE the Holy Spirit to the CHURCH, the pillar and foundation of the truth - as THIS WITNESS. Now, mankind can KNOW what is Sacred Scriptures.
Any other argument fails. Frankly, the Spirit doesn't talk to individuals about such things...witness the many different denominations making identical claims to the Spirit and yet, they differ. How can the Spirit of Truth give different messages on the same subject??? The Spirit is given to the Community, the Church to guide all generations to God's infallible Revelation. That's the bottom line. There is NO SCRIPTURE that tells us what belongs in the compilation of the Scriptures. Thus, using the Scripture alone for your theology is more properly called:
Sola Ego...
D46 said:
Many "books" were written that were not "inspired of God" and some don't even mention God in them.
Like the Book of Esther? Your version of Esther doesn't even mention God, but there it is, in the Bible. How did Luther let that one get by? And who even MADE Luther in charge of determining what IS Scriptures? Can't a Protestant later "receive guidance from the Spirit" and claim that the Gospel of Judas is Scriptures??? See where this "the Spirit tells me" leads us?
D46 said:
We have all that God intended for us to have or he is not the omnipotent and omniscience God we think he is as man would therefore control what went into the canon rather than God himself. Would God allow his word to be perverted and trashed by men in order for them to insert books that were not inspired? I think not.
Of course, that is why He gave us an infallible Church. Have you not read Matthew 16? What is bound on earth is bound in heaven. It is impossible that God would bind error on earth - since their is a linkage to what is bound on earth and heaven. Thus, God GUARDS His Truth. Infallibly. Not because of men, but because of God Himself promised that what was bound in heaven and earth would be the same. There is no error in heaven, thus, we have no error when the Church makes infallible statements, such as on the Canon of Scriptures.
Regards