What's new
By:
Filters
Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Esther 4:16 versus 5:1

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rstrats

Member
Esther said that she would fast for 3 days, night or day, and that after doing that, that she would go to the king. However, verse 5:1 says that she went to the king on the 3rd day. How can she go to the king on the 3rd day and at the same time go after the 3rd day?
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
rstrats said:
Esther said that she would fast for 3 days, night or day, and that after doing that, that she would go to the king. However, verse 5:1 says that she went to the king on the 3rd day. How can she go to the king on the 3rd day and at the same time go after the 3rd day?
Click to expand...
She probably fasted part of the time, but likely had some food when she went to the king, to avoid looking half dead. She likely wanted others to be fasting and praying for her while she was risking her life, hoping that God was hearing their prayers. Besides that, "3 days and nights" is an expression, not an absolute statement, since Jesus was "3 days and nights" in the "belly of the Earth," yet the time of his death was mathematically only 2 nights and parts of 3 days. It's an expression or idiom, not an arithmetical statement.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
rstrats said:
Esther said that she would fast for 3 days, night or day, and that after doing that, that she would go to the king. However, verse 5:1 says that she went to the king on the 3rd day. How can she go to the king on the 3rd day and at the same time go after the 3rd day?
Click to expand...

Three days and three nights in the heart of the earth, yet He rose on the third day.


Sounds like a Jewish thing.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
tdidymas said:
Jesus was "3 days and nights" in the "belly of the Earth," yet the time of his death was mathematically only 2 nights and parts of 3 days.
Click to expand...
Actually, He said it would be - "three days and three nights". And your 2 nights is based on the idea of a 6th day of the week burial. Many papers have been written for a 4th day or 5th day crucifixion.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Probably should get this discussion back onto the topic of the OP. Start a new discussion if you wish to talk about the crucifixion and resurrection of our Lord. Also, keep in mind that this forum (Q&A) is not a debate forum but only used to ask questions and get answres. If the OP has questions, they may be asked here but there is no place in this forum for debating the answers. That should be done in the Theology or Apologetics forum as appropriate.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
WIP said:
Also, keep in mind that this forum (Q&A) is not a debate forum but only used to ask questions and get answres. If the OP has questions, they may be asked here but there is no place in this forum for debating the answers.
Click to expand...
There's really a fine line between questioning an answer, and debating an answer, isn't there.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
rstrats said:
There's really a fine line between questioning an answer, and debating an answer, isn't there.
Click to expand...
Questions can be asked for clarity. Phrasing questions to invoke debating is not part of the purpose of this Q&A forum. Choose another forum to do that.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top