Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

four levels of happiness

C

Cure of Ars

Guest
Using just reason and natural law it is clear to see that we cannot be happy without being connected to something beyond ourselves, something transcendent. The major faith traditions throughout history testify to this. The Greeks i.e. Aristotle (and latter Christian’s) recognized four levels of happiness. I am quoting the following;

1. laetus: Happiness in a thing. Thus, “I see the linguini, I eat the linguini, it makes me feel good, I am happy.†This kind of happiness is based on something external to the self, is short-lived and, on reflection, we do not consider that it is all there is to human happiness.


2. felix: The happiness of comparative advantage. “I have more of this than X.†“I am better at this than X.†This kind of happiness results from competition with another person. The self is seen in terms of how we measure up to others. It has been called “the comparison game.†Such happiness is rather unstable and, if one fails, can lead to unhappiness and sense of worthlessness. Exclusive pursuit tends to oppress others. Most people would not imagine a world as satisfactory if it was composed of only happiness #2 type people.


3. Beatitudo: (Beatitudo = happiness or blessedness). The happiness that comes from seeing the good in others and doing the good for others. It is, in essence, other-regarding action. Happiness #3 is, in some sense, at war with happiness #2. One cannot be at the same time in competition with someone else and doing the good for and seeing the good in them. Most people would prefer a world (community, family, relationships) structured around the pursuit of happiness #3 than entirely based in happiness #2. Happiness #3 is higher than happiness #2. The problem with #3 is that it is necessarily limited. We cannot be someone else's everything. For example, we or they, will die and if our happiness is contingent upon them, it dies with them. “There must be more than this.â€Â

4. Sublime Beatitudo: (sublime = “to lift up or elevateâ€Â). This category, the most difficult to describe, encompasses a reach for fullness and perfection of happiness. The fullness, therefore, of goodness, beauty, truth and love. So we recognize in this category, those things that are, in a sense, beyond what we are capable of doing purely on our own.

http://catholiceducation.org/articles/a ... p0016.html

Doing what we want (in a selfish way) does not lead to lasting happiness only connecting to the transcendent God will lead to lasting happiness. Like St. Augustine said, "Thou hast created my soul, O God, after Thee, and it is restless until it rests in Thee." We are made for the eternal and we can never be fully happy until we find it.
 
Aristotle says all happiness is a result of action.

Laetus: action - eating
result - happiness

Felix: Action - aquiring
result - happiness

Beatitudo: action - actions done by others or ourselves
result - happiness

sublime beatitudo: action - seeking, striving
result - happiness

Aristotle also reconizes differant degrees of happiness basically physical or corpral and mental or spiritual. He says the action required by thought is more rewarding than that of the actions of the body.
Much like the higher happiness is that of beatitudo and sublime beatitudo.

It is very amazing how close to Catholic doctrine Aristotle was some 200+ years before Christ
 
The reason why I posted this is because I believe it is apparent by reason that we need something beyond ourselves to be truly happy. There are a lot of materialist that believe that there is nothing transcendent. So my argument is basically that the modern world is neutering reality when they reject the transcendent and I would argue that is why so many people in modern society are depressed.

As for Aristotle and the Catholic Church, there is no problem when Aristotle and his ideas are reconciled to Christ just as long as one does not try to reconcile Christ to Aristotle. There is a big difference between the two.
 
I totally agree with you. There is some "outside force" that allows all happiness to be and that in which all happiness is ground.

As for Aristotle - we need to accept this "outside force" and come to now it. As Christian, and I take it you are Catholic due to your name, we reconize this force to be God. As we come to know Him more and more we begin to experiance a more complete happiness, a more true happiness. So it is through our acts of acceptence, belief and growing in love, that we are able to have this deeper, more true happiness.
 
notapseudonym said:
I totally agree with you. There is some "outside force" that allows all happiness to be and that in which all happiness is ground.

As for Aristotle - we need to accept this "outside force" and come to now it. As Christian, and I take it you are Catholic due to your name, we reconize this force to be God. As we come to know Him more and more we begin to experiance a more complete happiness, a more true happiness. So it is through our acts of acceptence, belief and growing in love, that we are able to have this deeper, more true happiness.

High fives all around. (hehehe)
 
Back
Top