I am not dancing around anything, you are not familiar with the band. Jesus fulfilled the Law. He kept the entire Law. He is the only one worthy. He alone fulfilled the Law. Jesus fulfilled the Law and He is righteous because of it. Man's righteousness is as filthy rags, but in Christ Jesus, man can obtain the fulfillment of the Law, and Jesus' righteousness is imputed to him.
Once again, for the "severalth" time, him being perfect had little to do with his fulfillment of Torah. And none of it does away with Torah.
It is not a lie. Shame on you for calling me a liar, however, let man be a liar and God the truth.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. 11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. James 2:10-11
Ok, this scripture proves my point. And it was a lie for the simple fact that you go off the unsupported, scriptural assumption that we cannot keep Torah as a lifestyle because we will somehow fail. Nothing in scripture says that. And it still does not refute my point. It is irrelevant. Torah can and should be kept after you've grown in faith and learned the lifestyle.
Deuteronomy 30 refers to the blessings and cursings that the Israelites will suffer if they do not keep the commandments of God after they cross over Jordon. They are to obey many other statutes than just the ten commandments or they will be cursed. This portion of scripture does not relate to the Gentiles who have become grafted into the elect of God through Jesus Christ; and bless God we did not even have to be circumcised!
Please read Exodus 12:49. You have made a distinction between Jew and Gentile, something the scripture teaches against. We do have to keep Torah, but not because we are pressured immediately by heretic Jews and their "works of law" to be justified or saved at the beginning of faith. And btw, who is the elect, may I ask?
Jesus taught explicitly that that which was heard from long ago was now spiritually fulfilled in Christ. Adultery was now more than just laying with another's wife, it was now looking at a woman with lust in one's eye. In the past it was said to love your neighbor as yourself, but now one is to love one's enemy also for it is no great thing to love those who love us. Jesus also taught that in the past it was taught to make a vow, but now let your yea's be yea and your no's be no, but do not sware. In the past it was said that murder was wrong, but now if you hate your brother, you are breaking the thou shalt not kill commandment. Read Matthew 5.
I have read Matthew 5. He was simply (in additional to hint, mystery and allegorical statements) telling how the Torah should be interpreted to this generation of 1st century Jews. He wasn't adding anything or taking away from anything. He was preaching it as it was supposed to be preached since the day Torah was given. So all what you said is out of context and basically error, imo.
I didn't ignor what you said, I disagreed with what you said. The sabbath day was the day of rest given to the Israelites as one of their Laws. It was not given to the Gentiles during the period of grace in Jesus Christ.
The new covenant was given to the Israelites. You must not be a part of that either. I see that you seem to be also a dispensationalist. A "period of grace" vs. the contrary which you seem to be implying (a "period of law") is not in scripture. There is no difference between anyone in Messiah. All are saved by grace through faith (as it always was), all are judged by one Torah, each man according to his works.
The sabbath was a day of rest for God as he created the heavens and earth. Do you think God really needed rest? No.
Irrelevant point.
Jesus said that the sabbath was created for man, and that man was not created for the sabbath.
This was in reference to fences put on the Torah by the Sanhedrin. He was not preaching against sabbath law when he made this statement. I am a member of several boards, and I daresay that in a period of a couple weeks, this passage has been taken out of context and brought to me by different people at least ten times. The sabbath day is for us. That is why we keep it.
The creation of the heavens and the earth could have been accomplished in one day, but God determined to give man a template to know the beginning and end of his detemination of his plan. Six thousand years of man working through sin, with the seventh thousand years being the Holy Reign of Jesus Christ, the rest for the elect.
"Working through sin"? I don't get what you mean by this, but anyway, the coming rest is shadowed by our weekly sabbath observance.
Jesus is our rest now, as the sabbath was the rest then.
Dispensationalist falsehood (no offense). This is found absolutely NOWHERE in scripture.
Now everyday shoud be a day of resting from man's work, and instead man should imitate Jesus by being about the Father's business. Those that are born of God, born again should have the mind of Christ Jesus, and walk in the liberty of his grace by abiding in Him. The Law is now written on each believer's heart, and this Law is not tedious and manmade. It is the yoke of Jesus that he will carry for each of his sheep.
As far as your first statement in this paragraph, do you mean we should not work as in a job to sustain ourselves and livelihood? Or do you mean focusing on our own selves and instead working for whatever kingdom ministry or task given to us? This was always the case. It was in the past and is now (check Isaiah 58). Torah was never given as "tedious" and it is not "manmade". And do you understand what our "liberty" is? It isn't "liberty" from the big, bad Torah, as most preach. The primary mission of Messiah was NOT to do away with Torah or be against Torah as opposed to grace or faith. This is not in scripture. Torah was always supposed to be in the heart (new covenant passage in Jeremiah 31:33 is usually misinterpreted; ask if you want to). And what do you mean by that last statement? The yoke he carried was our sin and man's additional dogma that put us in bondage (Colossians 2:14; Ephesians 2:15, for examples).
And dealing specifically with your repeated idea of the literal sabbath not being binding because everyday should be kept holy, none of this is supported in scripture.
Yes, we should do the Fathers work everyday of our life and walk kadosh everyday of our life, but this has NOTHING to do with keeping the LITERAL sabbath commandment (which is part of walking kadosh). You are pulling that from the air. It is not one way or the other. Staying holy everday and doing Yahweh's work everyday is not contrasted with keeping the literal sabbath day. False dichotomy.