Dustin Blystone
Member
- Nov 9, 2021
- 14
- 16
Hello,
I'm currently writing a Genesis 1 and 2 commentary.
I've tried to research this topic, asked people who are part of the science establishment view, and searched online for an answer.
I cannot get a straight answer from anyone.
The lowest number (estimate) I've gotten is 2000 and the highest number (estimate) I've gotten is 50,000.
I cannot get the people who gave me those to give me their sources or whether that was 2000 individual gargantuan fossilized bones, or 2000 fossilized skeletal remains of a gargantuan find, containing multiple bones. Same with the 50,000 number.
I'm kind of tired of Christian apologists even acknowledging "dinosaurs" in the first place if they were simply an aberration wiped out at the flood. I'd rather puncture the entire premise altogether.
My point is that in Arlington National Cemetery, there is and still will have room for about 750,000 buried dead total with the acreage available. That's one single cemetery in the entire world. If the entire history of all of paleontology has only come up with 50,000 finds total, that is an incredibly small number of finds, and doesn't corroborate to millions of these things running around for 100's of millions of years at all, (not that I believe in 100's of millions of years btw). I understand perfectly well that fossilized remains are hard to come by, but still 50,000 is an incredibly small number for a construct that asserts millions of creatures over 100's of millions of years.
It actually is commensurate with the idea that it was a temporary aberration (potentially Nephilim based) that was wiped out at the flood and these finds, where a single gargantuan bone is extrapolated into somebody's extraordinary poetic license of a what they think that creature looked like, are finds that don't corroborate a "dinosaur" viewpoint at all, but actually a Nephilim, Biblical viewpoint.
If anyone with better web searching skills than I possess can find any empirical evidence somewhere, where they can find the total number of paleontological finds of gargantuan nature, I'd appreciate it.
As far as I can tell, the best anyone has is an 85% complete "T-Rex" . . . and the vast majority of "extrapolate-asauruses" are from a handful of bones extrapolated into creatures based upon the extrapolator's wild imagination. Vast, vast majority of museum of Natural History displays are plaster re-creations based off a handful of actual bones . . . and of course . . . wild imaginations.
Any thoughts? Evidence? Sources?
I'm currently writing a Genesis 1 and 2 commentary.
I've tried to research this topic, asked people who are part of the science establishment view, and searched online for an answer.
I cannot get a straight answer from anyone.
The lowest number (estimate) I've gotten is 2000 and the highest number (estimate) I've gotten is 50,000.
I cannot get the people who gave me those to give me their sources or whether that was 2000 individual gargantuan fossilized bones, or 2000 fossilized skeletal remains of a gargantuan find, containing multiple bones. Same with the 50,000 number.
I'm kind of tired of Christian apologists even acknowledging "dinosaurs" in the first place if they were simply an aberration wiped out at the flood. I'd rather puncture the entire premise altogether.
My point is that in Arlington National Cemetery, there is and still will have room for about 750,000 buried dead total with the acreage available. That's one single cemetery in the entire world. If the entire history of all of paleontology has only come up with 50,000 finds total, that is an incredibly small number of finds, and doesn't corroborate to millions of these things running around for 100's of millions of years at all, (not that I believe in 100's of millions of years btw). I understand perfectly well that fossilized remains are hard to come by, but still 50,000 is an incredibly small number for a construct that asserts millions of creatures over 100's of millions of years.
It actually is commensurate with the idea that it was a temporary aberration (potentially Nephilim based) that was wiped out at the flood and these finds, where a single gargantuan bone is extrapolated into somebody's extraordinary poetic license of a what they think that creature looked like, are finds that don't corroborate a "dinosaur" viewpoint at all, but actually a Nephilim, Biblical viewpoint.
If anyone with better web searching skills than I possess can find any empirical evidence somewhere, where they can find the total number of paleontological finds of gargantuan nature, I'd appreciate it.
As far as I can tell, the best anyone has is an 85% complete "T-Rex" . . . and the vast majority of "extrapolate-asauruses" are from a handful of bones extrapolated into creatures based upon the extrapolator's wild imagination. Vast, vast majority of museum of Natural History displays are plaster re-creations based off a handful of actual bones . . . and of course . . . wild imaginations.
Any thoughts? Evidence? Sources?
