Bible Study How much Bible study/ reading do you do?

Leaning the original languages is something I will eventually try and do but to be honest I'm not ready for that yet.
Just a quick question is Hebrew Old Testament and Greek the New Testament?
While none of us may be professional scholars, it’s not necessary to become fluent in Hebrew or Greek to understand Scripture.

However, gaining a basic understanding of the grammar and syntax--how the words are structured and how the original language functions-can be incredibly helpful for rightly handling the word of truth (2 Timothy 2:15).

Even a simple grasp of how verbs function or how prepositions affect meaning can often clarify passages that are otherwise misunderstood in translation.

J.
 
Leaning the original languages is something I will eventually try and do but to be honest I'm not ready for that yet.
Just a quick question is Hebrew Old Testament and Greek the New Testament?
The NT is Greek. The OT is mostly Hebrew, but has some other languages also. With all the electronic helps we have today, the meaning of the original languages is very accessible today without fully learning them. But I do think it is a noble persuit to try to learn them. I think learning Greek is easier, so I'd start there.

LOL, I just saw Johann's anwer.
 
Leaning the original languages is something I will eventually try and do but to be honest I'm not ready for that yet.
Just a quick question is Hebrew Old Testament and Greek the New Testament?
You have to be a christian for 40 years to really study the Bible. Although they teach a substantial amount to 12 year old girls to make sure they get married to the right person for them. They do the same for the boys but they mostly concentrate on the women. I do not think a person is qualified to be an elder in the church if they have not been a Christian for 40 years.
 
it’s not necessary to become fluent in Hebrew or Greek to understand Scripture.
Actually it is if you want to translate the Bible for yourself. I do not trust people to do that for me. The idea that Eve came from Adam's rib and they covered themselves with leaves is a good example of this.

Modern clothing made from fig fiber tends to have a delicate, paper-like texture, making it visually appealing but not always durable. Fig fiber is lightweight and often used in eco-conscious fashion, but it lacks the strength of traditional textiles like cotton or wool.

My high school jacket was made from wool and that is a lot warmer than cotton.
 
Last edited:


You will be edified, I promise you
Taafe

Johann.



You will be edified, I promise you
Taafe

Johann.

This is great, thank you. I've also downloaded the app, and I appreciate how he breaks down each book at the beginning to prepare you for how to approach them. 👍
 
You have to be a christian for 40 years to really study the Bible. Although they teach a substantial amount to 12 year old girls to make sure they get married to the right person for them. They do the same for the boys but they mostly concentrate on the women. I do not think a person is qualified to be an elder in the church if they have not been a Christian for 40 years.

I don't believe you need to be a Christian for 40 years to study the Bible. I began studying the Bible the moment I picked it up. I'm not planning to teach anyone else—unless God has other plans for me. This journey is for my personal growth.
 
This is great, thank you. I've also downloaded the app, and I appreciate how he breaks down each book at the beginning to prepare you for how to approach them. 👍
Taafe
You’re the only person I know who has actually downloaded the software—may our Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit, richly bless you in your studies, brother!

Johann.
 
Taafe
You’re the only person I know who has actually downloaded the software—may our Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit, richly bless you in your studies, brother!

Johann.
Do me a favor Taafe--post John 1.1 from Utley, now you know why I love hermeneutics.!

Johann.
 
Taafe
You’re the only person I know who has actually downloaded the software—may our Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit, richly bless you in your studies, brother!

Johann.

It truly deserves much more recognition, significant time and effort has been devoted to this.
Do me a favor Taafe--post John 1.1 from Utley, now you know why I love hermeneutics.!

Johann.
1:1 "In the beginning" This reflects Genesis 1:1 and is also used in 1 John 1:1 as a reference to the incarnation. It is possible that 1 John was a cover letter to the Gospel. Both deal with Gnosticism. John 1:1-5 is an affirmation of Jesus Christ's divine pre-existence before creation (cf. John 1:15,30; 8:56-59; 16:28; 17:5,24; Phil. 2:6-7; Col. 1:17).

In the NT Jesus is described as

  1. a new creation, not marred by the Fall (i.e., Gen. 3:15 fulfilled for mankind)
  2. a new conquest (Promised Land)
  3. a new exodus (fulfilled prophecy)
  4. a new Moses (law giver)
  5. a new Joshua (cf. Heb. 4:8)
  6. a new water miracle (cf. Hebrews 3-4)
  7. new manna (cf. John 6)
  8. new temple
  9. new priest
and so many more, especially in Hebrews.

SPECIAL TOPIC: ARCHĒ

SPECIAL TOPIC: FROM THE BEGINNING

▣ "was" (thrice) This is an IMPERFECT TENSE (cf. John 1:1,2,4,10) which focuses on continual existence in past time. This TENSE is used to show the Logos' pre-existence (cf. John 8:57-58; 17:5,24; Col. 1:17). It is contrasted with the AORIST TENSES of John 1:3 (i.e., creation), 6 (i.e., John the Baptist, and 14 (i.e., the incarnation).

▣ "the Word" The Greek term logos referred to a message, not just a single word. In this context it is a title which the Greeks used to describe "world reason" and the Hebrews as analogus with "Wisdom." John chose this term to assert that God's Word is both a person and a message. See Contextual Insights, D.

▣ "with God" "With" could be paraphrased "face to face." It depicts intimate fellowship. It also points toward the concept of one divine essence and three personal eternal manifestations. The NT asserts the paradox that Jesus is separate from the Father, but also that He is one with the Father.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE TRINITY

▣ "the Word was God" This VERB is IMPERFECT TENSE as in John 1:1a. There is no ARTICLE (which identifies the SUBJECT, see F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, p. 66) with Theos, but Theos is placed first in the Greek phrase for emphasis. This verse and John 1:18 are strong statements of the full Deity of the pre-existent Logos (cf. John 5:18; 8:58; 10:30; 14:9; 17:11; 20:28; Rom. 9:5; Heb. 1:8; 2 Pet. 1:1). Jesus is fully divine (i.e., the grammatical rule related to two NOUNS with a linking VERB and only one PRONOUN. One must assume the ARTICLE makes both defiite, "Sharp's Rule"), as well as fully human (cf. 1 John 4:1-3). He is not the same as God the Father, but He is the very same divine essence as the Father.

SPECIAL TOPIC: MONOTHEISM

SPECIAL TOPIC: DEITY OF CHRIST FROM THE OT

The NT asserts the full Deity of Jesus of Nazareth, but protects the distinct personhood of the Father. The one divine essence is emphasized in John 1:1; 5:18; 10:30,34-38; 14:9-10; and 20:28, while their distinct persons are emphasized in John 1:2,14,18; 5:19-23; 8:28; 10:25,29; 14:11,12,13,16.
 
It truly deserves much more recognition, significant time and effort has been devoted to this.

1:1 "In the beginning" This reflects Genesis 1:1 and is also used in 1 John 1:1 as a reference to the incarnation. It is possible that 1 John was a cover letter to the Gospel. Both deal with Gnosticism. John 1:1-5 is an affirmation of Jesus Christ's divine pre-existence before creation (cf. John 1:15,30; 8:56-59; 16:28; 17:5,24; Phil. 2:6-7; Col. 1:17).

In the NT Jesus is described as

  1. a new creation, not marred by the Fall (i.e., Gen. 3:15 fulfilled for mankind)
  2. a new conquest (Promised Land)
  3. a new exodus (fulfilled prophecy)
  4. a new Moses (law giver)
  5. a new Joshua (cf. Heb. 4:8)
  6. a new water miracle (cf. Hebrews 3-4)
  7. new manna (cf. John 6)
  8. new temple
  9. new priest
and so many more, especially in Hebrews.

SPECIAL TOPIC: ARCHĒ

SPECIAL TOPIC: FROM THE BEGINNING

▣ "was" (thrice) This is an IMPERFECT TENSE (cf. John 1:1,2,4,10) which focuses on continual existence in past time. This TENSE is used to show the Logos' pre-existence (cf. John 8:57-58; 17:5,24; Col. 1:17). It is contrasted with the AORIST TENSES of John 1:3 (i.e., creation), 6 (i.e., John the Baptist, and 14 (i.e., the incarnation).

▣ "the Word" The Greek term logos referred to a message, not just a single word. In this context it is a title which the Greeks used to describe "world reason" and the Hebrews as analogus with "Wisdom." John chose this term to assert that God's Word is both a person and a message. See Contextual Insights, D.

▣ "with God" "With" could be paraphrased "face to face." It depicts intimate fellowship. It also points toward the concept of one divine essence and three personal eternal manifestations. The NT asserts the paradox that Jesus is separate from the Father, but also that He is one with the Father.

SPECIAL TOPIC: THE TRINITY

▣ "the Word was God" This VERB is IMPERFECT TENSE as in John 1:1a. There is no ARTICLE (which identifies the SUBJECT, see F. F. Bruce, Answers to Questions, p. 66) with Theos, but Theos is placed first in the Greek phrase for emphasis. This verse and John 1:18 are strong statements of the full Deity of the pre-existent Logos (cf. John 5:18; 8:58; 10:30; 14:9; 17:11; 20:28; Rom. 9:5; Heb. 1:8; 2 Pet. 1:1). Jesus is fully divine (i.e., the grammatical rule related to two NOUNS with a linking VERB and only one PRONOUN. One must assume the ARTICLE makes both defiite, "Sharp's Rule"), as well as fully human (cf. 1 John 4:1-3). He is not the same as God the Father, but He is the very same divine essence as the Father.

SPECIAL TOPIC: MONOTHEISM

SPECIAL TOPIC: DEITY OF CHRIST FROM THE OT

The NT asserts the full Deity of Jesus of Nazareth, but protects the distinct personhood of the Father. The one divine essence is emphasized in John 1:1; 5:18; 10:30,34-38; 14:9-10; and 20:28, while their distinct persons are emphasized in John 1:2,14,18; 5:19-23; 8:28; 10:25,29; 14:11,12,13,16.

Do you have access to all the video seminars and MP3s?

J.
 
Taafe
You’re the only person I know who has actually downloaded the software—may our Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit, richly bless you in your studies, brother!

Johann.

It truly deserves much more recognition, significant time and effort has been devoted to this.
Do me a favor Taafe--post John 1.1 from Utley, now you know why I love hermeneutics.!

Johann.

Do you have access to all the video seminars and MP3s?

J.

Yes, everything it is all on the app. When you click on resources if gives you the links to all his sermons, YouTube videos and MP3s etc.
Have you tried downloading the app yet?
 
It truly deserves much more recognition, significant time and effort has been devoted to this.




Yes, everything it is all on the app. When you click on resources if gives you the links to all his sermons, YouTube videos and MP3s etc.
Have you tried downloading the app yet?
It truly deserves much more recognition, significant time and effort has been devoted to this.




Yes, everything it is all on the app. When you click on resources if gives you the links to all his sermons, YouTube videos and MP3s etc.
Have you tried downloading the app yet?
Brother, I've had his software on my computer for years. His teachings have truly impacted the course of my studies, especially in rightly dividing the Word of the Lord.

And yet, many seem to 'sneeze' or scoff whenever I mention the name Bob Utley.


May God bless you--and now you know a bit more about how I study. Just remember: he is fallible, as we all are.

Shalom to you and family!

Johann.
 
Brother, I've had his software on my computer for years. His teachings have truly impacted the course of my studies, especially in rightly dividing the Word of the Lord.

And yet, many seem to 'sneeze' or scoff whenever I mention the name Bob Utley.


May God bless you--and now you know a bit more about how I study. Just remember: he is fallible, as we all are.

Shalom to you and family!

Johann.
 
Back
Top