Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How should a Christian view environmentalism?

Dave...

Member
How should a Christian view environmentalism?

There is a difference between the biblical view of the environment and the political movement known as "environmentalism." The Bible is clear that the earth and everything in it was given by God to man to rule over and subdue. "And God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth'" (Genesis 1:28). Because they were created in His image, God gave men and women a privileged place among all creatures and commanded them to exercise stewardship over the earth (Genesis 1:26-28; Psalm 8:6-8). Stewardship implies caretaking, not abusing. We are to intelligently manage the resources God has given us, using all diligent care to preserve and protect them. This is seen in the Old Testament where God commanded that the fields and vineyards would be sown and harvested for six years, then left fallow for the seventh year in order to replenish the soil's nutrients, both to rest the land and to ensure continued provision for His people in the future (Exodus 23:10-11; Leviticus 25:1-7).

In addition to our role of caretakers, we are to appreciate the functionality and beauty of the environment. In His incredible grace and power, God has placed on this planet everything needed to feed, clothe, and house the billions of people who have lived on it since the garden of Eden. All the resources He has provided for our needs are renewable, and He continues to provide the sun and rain necessary to sustain and replenish those resources. And if this were not enough, He has also decorated the planet in glorious color and scenic beauty to appeal to our aesthetic sense and thrill our souls with wonder. There are countless varieties of flowers, exotic birds, and other lovely manifestations of His grace to us.

At the same time, the earth we inhabit is not a permanent planet, nor was it ever intended to be. The environmental movement is consumed with trying to preserve the planet forever, and we know this is not God's plan. He tells us in 2 Peter 3:10 that at the end of the age, the earth and all He has created will be destroyed: "But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and the works that are upon it will be burned up." The physical, natural earth in its present form, with its entire universe will be consumed and God will create a "new heaven and a new earth" (2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1).

So, we see that rather than trying to preserve the earth for thousands or even millions of years to come, we are to be good stewards of it for as long as it lasts - which will be as long as it serves God's sovereign plan and purpose.

'Question of the Week' Copyright 2002-2006 © GotQuestions.org
http://www.studylight.org/col/que/

Agree? Disagree?
 
Well I would have to agree with you. We need to take card of God's creation. The problem is tomany of the envirolmentalist worship the creation rather that the Creator. God bless. :)
 
Dave... said:
At the same time, the earth we inhabit is not a permanent planet, nor was it ever intended to be. The environmental movement is consumed with trying to preserve the planet forever, and we know this is not God's plan. He tells us in 2 Peter 3:10 that at the end of the age, the earth and all He has created will be destroyed: "But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and the works that are upon it will be burned up." The physical, natural earth in its present form, with its entire universe will be consumed and God will create a "new heaven and a new earth" (2 Peter 3:13; Revelation 21:1).

So, we see that rather than trying to preserve the earth for thousands or even millions of years to come, we are to be good stewards of it for as long as it lasts - which will be as long as it serves God's sovereign plan and purpose.
While I do not dispute the above, I wonder about whether it is useful information for us. In other words, the very unknowability as to when God will "be done" with this world should motivate us to take a very careful approach to stewardship.

In fact, I cannot see any reason to not assume that we need to care for the earth as if it indeed will last forever. I can see no reason to act otherwise.
 
I think this reveals in the danger in the mode of thinking of the "Jesus is coming soon" crowd. If Jesus is coming soon, and the world is ending within the next several generations, then why bother to preserve the earth? Maintain or strive for peace (if the apocalpyse is just going to bring more war anyways)? Think of how many problems the world is stuck with today because we haven't been looking in the long term?
 
Our stance ought to be simple. When the Lord gives us resources, we ought to be as thrifty as possible. We are to conserve the gifts of God's earth when needs are absent, and wisely distribute them when anyone is in need. We also ought to use the creative powers we inhereted from the Father to make the land as useful as possible. In this day and age, the only reason people around the world still go hungry is because of the evil of man.
 
I don't think that the greed of the developers and corporations allows them to look at the big picture, they can only see the $ of the "next deal".

As the people, we need to see the danger of the "next deal", while not hating any and all development. At the same time we cannot resort to the other extreme...

Understanding envirnmentalists who worship earth as a god, they really don't want alternative energy. If we were to grow fields of corn to make ethanol, they would protest the corn fields. They want to do away with all cars and make everyone live in the inner city, with no suburbs or living in the country. They want everyone using public transportation. Anything else is unacceptable to them.

I personally disagree with both extremes, but each extreme is used to further the cause of the other, and we get caught in the middle.
 
Back
Top