cyberjosh
Member
I am writing a book on the life of Jesus and chronology is a fairly big issue that I would like to keep with between all four gospels. I noticed something peculier about the reason why Jesus first left Judea to start his early ministry in Galillee: Matthew 4:12 says, "Now when Jesus had heard that John was cast into prison, he departed into Galilee.". Now Mark merely says that 'after' Jesus heard of John's imprisonment he left, but Matthew makes it more immediate by saying 'when'. Now John 4:1-3 says, "When therefore the Lord knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John (although Jesus Himself was not baptizing, but His disciples were), He left Judea, and departed again into Galilee." This attributes Jesus leaving to avoid confrontation with the Pharisees and John's disciples. Now can what John and Matthew said be tied together somehow in that John's imprisonment triggered the disagreements? This doesn't appear to be the case because John was present and mediating the dispute in John chapter 3 when the dispute first started.
Is it possible that coincidentaly John was thrown into prison shortly after the dispute first broke out and that Jesus left Judea for a dual purpose, and perhaps because John could no longer mediate in such circumstances?
Tell me your thoughts.
Is it possible that coincidentaly John was thrown into prison shortly after the dispute first broke out and that Jesus left Judea for a dual purpose, and perhaps because John could no longer mediate in such circumstances?
Tell me your thoughts.