Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How to Scripturally Study the Bible

S

Soma-Sight

Guest
John 5:39 - Search the scriptures…

II Tim 2:15 - Study to show yourself approved…rightly dividing the word of truth

II Tim 3:15-17 - …from a child you have known the holy scriptures, which are able to make you wise unto salvation…

Acts 17:11 - The Bereans were more noble…because they searched the scriptures daily

Mark 12:24 - Do you not therefore err not knowing the scriptures…?



Anyone with whom God's Spirit is working wants to know the truth of the Word of God. If that desire to know the mind of God is strong enough, the search for the truth will not be confined to church doctrine nor to any school of thought.

What the local pastor may think or what some popular, well known evangelist or friends and family, whom we love and respect, may think will become completely irrelevant when we grasp the true significance of the words of our Savior; "It is the Spirit that gives life. The words that I speak to you, they are spirit and they are life."

There is a spirit that argues "You are like the Pharisees; you know the letter of the scriptures, but you don't know the spirit of the scriptures." Christ said that the Pharisees did not know the scriptures. John 22:24 - "You do err not knowing the scriptures." Had the Pharisees known the scriptures, they would have known Christ. Otherwise, the admonition of Christ to the Pharisees to "search the scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life. And these are they which testify of me" would have been meaningless. Christ said "words...are spirit." (John 6:63) So if we know God's word, we will not err.

Now anyone who knows the scriptures at all is aware of the statement of Paul "knowledge puffs up, but charity builds up." Anyone studying the word of God to edify himself obviously doesn't really know the word of God.

It is not the purpose of this Web page to impute motives to anyone for believing anything. God works with each of his creatures as he sees fit. Only he is sovereign. And it is with that firm conviction that we offer this Web page on how to scripturally study the scriptures.

I am a graduate of a bible college. Yet I always wondered how anyone could say authoritatively "this Greek (or Hebrew) word appears only five times in the original manuscripts and means such and such." I had learned from a well known evangelist that when the disciples asked Christ "What shall be the sign of your coming and of the end of the world" (Mat 24:3) that the word here translated "world" was actually the Greek word "aion" meaning "age." So what the disciples were actually asking was "What shall be the sign...of the end of the age?"

I didn't just take his word for this. I bought myself a Young's Concordance, looked up "world" in Mat 24:3 and, sure enough, there it was: 28 entries. "Age, indefinite time, dispensation, aion." I was content with this knowledge and with my Young's Concordance for as long as the Lord wanted me to remain content which was for three years of my college career.

But eventually, I noticed repeatedly that when I really wanted to find out what the original word was, it was not in my incomplete Young's. So I graduated to using a Complete and Exhaustive Strong's Concordance. Strong's seemed awkward at first, having to find a number before you could find a word. But the assurance that every word in scripture was in there and that all I needed was a question about any word in the King James English Bible and I was sure to find the original word made it indespinsible.

Then I discovered that the word "worlds" in Hebrews 1:2 was also actually "aion." This listing ("worlds") didn't even appear in my Young's, and I had to have it pointed out that there was another English word translated from the Greek word "aion." Over the next several years, I was to learn that there are thirteen different English words and phrases translated from that one Greek word "aion." Suddenly, my Strong's Exhaustive Concordance that I had thought so much of for so long seemed totally inadequate. How was I to do an effective word study with an English concordance when the original Greek or Hebrew or Chaldee might have a dozen different English translations? How was I to know whether or not this was the case for the word translated "work" (Greek "ergon")? Did it also have thirteen other English translations? How about the word "comforter" (Greek "parakleetos")? Does it also have thirteen English translations? I had become painfully aware of how much I was at the mercy of the translators.

God was saying I was called in Christ "before times eonian." (II Tim 1:9; KJV "before the world began") So the eons must have a beginning. But the translators called it "eternal" or "forever" or "world."

The disciples asked Christ "what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the world?" (Mat 24:3) The word here translated "world" is "aion." So the eons have an end. But the translators read "world" or "everlasting" or "forever and ever" or "course" or "evermore" or "world without end" and on and on. Thirteen different words and phrases used for one Greek word. How could this be? By what method or by what authority was this done? Had scripture been allowed to interpret scripture by the translators? Was it possible that the translators of 1611 in the hire of King James had allowed church doctrine or the pressure of their fellow scholars to influence their decisions? Well, I didn't know the answers to those questions, but thirteen different words and phrases for one word seemed just a bit inconsistent to me.

If only I could know every instance where the Greek word "aion" appeared in scriptures without first having to figure out just how many different English words were used by the translators. It would be cumbersome, but it would be almost like reading the original. "What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age" is obviously a much better translation than "end of the world." God's own word would be my guide to the best understanding. I would be at the mercy of no man. I would know what God had actually said without the influence and bias of any man or institution! Oh, it would be so nice if someone just had an exhaustive concordance that would give me the original Greek or Hebrew first and then listed all the instances where the original word appeared. This refrain was to become my mantra for close to two decades.

Then one year, I attended a Bible conference in South Carolina. Following the service, I ran my mantra by the Pastor who was hosting the conference.

I said, "You know, it seems to me that there ought to be a book out there somewhere that would list the original first. Then you wouldn't have to figure out how many different ways the translators saw fit to use the word. You could decide for yourself between God and you what any word meant just by considering the context in which it was used."

"Isn't that what Wigram's does?" he replied as casually as if he thought everyone was familiar with Wigram's.

I had never heard of Wigram's, but if it did do that, I wanted it regardless of price.

This book is actually two volumes; "The Englishman's Greek Concordance of the New Testament" and "The Englishman's Hebrew Concordance of the Old Testament," both by George V. Wigram. I immediately called every Bible book store in and around my area. No one that I talked to had even heard of them. In hindsight, I was amazed that my Bible college professors had never referred to them. These invaluable resources have been available since 1843, and generally speaking, only the academic elite are aware of their existence. (Ed note: A set of Wigram's can be purchased from amazon.com for under $60.00 for the set - 9/7/99; often they can be found on half.com for half or less of the retail price. Or a set can also be ordered from John Brouht at Concordant bible Library, Inc. 6201 29th Ave. N., St. Petersburg, Florida 33710.)

I finally found a source and acquired my own copy of each volume. Now, for the first time, I could thoroughly "search the scriptures . . . to see whether these things were so" (Acts 17:11) and "try the spirits whether they are of God" (I Jhn 4:1). Remember John 6:63; "words . . . are spirit." To try the spirits, we must know the words of God. In I John 4:6, we read ". . . he that knows God hears us; he that is not of God hears not us. Hereby know we the Spirit of Truth and the spirit of error." Christ said "You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free" (Jhn 8:32). The "us" of I John 4:6 is Christ and the apostles and the prophets (Eph. 2:20). The truth of John 8:32 is the Bible, the "word" of God (Jhn 17:17).

These are powerful truths and promises, but they hinge on our knowledge of His word. If God is talking about an age, and we think he is talking about eternity, we will, like the Pharisees ". . . err not knowing the scriptures" (Mat 22:29).

If you're looking for your own copies of these indespensible resources, call your local Christian bookstore. If you have difficulty finding them, then contact T & D Christian Sales Bookstore: P.O. Box 4140 Cleveland, TN 37320. For faster service (orders only) call 1-800-423-9595.

If you have any comments or questions, please direct them to mikevinson@mindspring.com.

http://mikevinson.home.mindspring.com/study.html

http://www.penfoldbooks.com/product/32/204
 
The problem is that this post ignores the glaringly obvious - the vast majority of Christians do not understand Greek or Hebrew. This doesn't mean that we can't come to some understanding, but someone trained in these ancient languages and proper biblical hermeneutics can take the average person much deeper in biblical study.

It is apparent from your posts that you prefer your own interpretation instead of one whom God has called to be a teacher of his Word: "As for me, I prefer the small getherings of one to three people I trust as we DISCUSS what the Bible says to us PERSONALLY."

What this guy says is no different than what you are railing against Soma.
 
The problem is that this post ignores the glaringly obvious - the vast majority of Christians do not understand Greek or Hebrew. This doesn't mean that we can't come to some understanding, but someone trained in these ancient languages and proper biblical hermeneutics can take the average person much deeper in biblical study.

It is apparent from your posts that you prefer your own interpretation instead of one whom God has called to be a teacher of his Word: "As for me, I prefer the small getherings of one to three people I trust as we DISCUSS what the Bible says to us PERSONALLY."

What this guy says is no different than what you are railing against Soma.

Free!

I am surprised at this statement!

It is apparent from your posts that you prefer your own interpretation instead of one whom God has called to be a teacher of his Word:

If you cannot trust your own interpretation and prayer with God PERSONALLY who can you trust?

The Jehovah Witness pastor?
The Mormon one?
The Evangelical one?
SDA?

I know you know better than this!

Need I remind you that the Protestant Churches were formed from the labors of people who questioned the authority figures and interpretations of thier time?

The "Spirit" of any Protestant should be just this.... INDIVIDUAL time seeking the face of God!


This link I put up merely tells us all that we need a Wigrams! It has the ORIGINAL language of the Bible rather than the biased false ones that we all have on our bookshelves today..... namely the Strongs!

Dont tell me you are too lazy to search out the Truth on your own!

I know you better than this.....

At the time of death remember that all those nights spent searching out the Truth for YOURSELF will bear fruit in a good way.
 
The problem is that this post ignores the glaringly obvious - the vast majority of Christians do not understand Greek or Hebrew.

If your soul rests on the line due to this ignorance how quickly do you think people would flock to the libraries!

I am not suggesting that we are "saved" by knowledge as a Good Gnostic Fundy would, but what is the harm in learning all you can?
 
It is apparent from your posts that you prefer your own interpretation instead of one whom God has called to be a teacher of his Word: "As for me, I prefer the small getherings of one to three people I trust as we DISCUSS what the Bible says to us PERSONALLY."

For the record Free.....

I would rather spend three hours with YOU going over what we have studied and experienced versus sitting in a Pew for three hours listening to the same old hash you could read in the statement of beliefs of the respective congregation!

Remember that!
 
I do hear what you are saying Soma, I really do. I disagree with most of it, but not all. Your position is very post-modern - that we can all have our truth and all be right. The problem is that in rejecting God-given authorities in our lives to teach and explain the Word of God, allowing for only/mostly personal interpretation, anyone and everyone can claim to come to the truth about any doctrine but be at polar opposites from everyone else. But that simply cannot be true.

Also, on the one hand you are putting down pastors and such as giving "their" interpretation, but on the other hand you wanting your own interpretation. But all you have done is shifted the interpreter from the pastor to yourself; what you say about the pastor would then apply to you. It is possible that the pastor's interpretation is what God intended on saying (or is saying); likewise, for your interpretation. It is also possible that both of your interpretations are correct, in which case they would agree, but it is also possible that neither are correct.

Soma-Sight said:
If you cannot trust your own interpretation and prayer with God PERSONALLY who can you trust?

The Jehovah Witness pastor?
The Mormon one?
The Evangelical one?
SDA?

I know you know better than this!
:) I am not saying that one cannot at all trust their own interpretation or try to come to an understanding of Scripture on their own, but it should align with what has been historically and traditionally taught within the Church (within reason of course). As I have said several times in the past, if there is no orthodoxy, no correct belief, or practice for that matter, then we may as well all pack it in as any and very interpretation could be correct.

Remember, each of the movements you mentioned above all started with personal interpretation. And I am sure you would agree that they all cannot be correct.

Soma-Sight said:
Need I remind you that the Protestant Churches were formed from the labors of people who questioned the authority figures and interpretations of thier time?

The "Spirit" of any Protestant should be just this.... INDIVIDUAL time seeking the face of God!
I certainly agree with your second point, but only partly agree with the first. The Protestant movement began as a "reformation" movement, to reform the church (which it certainly needed for the reasons you gave), not create an entirely new split in the church. The problem of thousands of denominations is what happens when personal interpretation is pulled from it's roots in orthodoxy and tradition, allowing to run amok.

Soma-Sight said:
Dont tell me you are too lazy to search out the Truth on your own!

I know you better than this.....
:) I wouldn't call it laziness... :wink: You do know me a bit, don't you? ;)

Soma-Sight said:
At the time of death remember that all those nights spent searching out the Truth for YOURSELF will bear fruit in a good way.
The very thought of lying in my death-bed and realizing that I missed it because I didn't bother to seach is what keeps me searching. I'll search until the day I die.

Soma-Sight said:
If your soul rests on the line due to this ignorance how quickly do you think people would flock to the libraries!
But instead you propose that we all quickly get our Wigrams. What is the difference? ;)

I certainly don't think that one's salvation rests on knowing the original languages, but I am not so certain that one can get very far beyond the "milk" without either knowing Greek and Hebrew or being taught by someone who does.

Soma-Sight said:
I am not suggesting that we are "saved" by knowledge as a Good Gnostic Fundy would, but what is the harm in learning all you can?
lol! I am trying to learn all I can, but I am careful about what I learn and what I accept as truth.

Soma-Sight said:
For the record Free.....

I would rather spend three hours with YOU going over what we have studied and experienced versus sitting in a Pew for three hours listening to the same old hash you could read in the statement of beliefs of the respective congregation!

Remember that!
I will remember that and, God willing, we will do that, whether in this life or the next (I would prefer the next just so that we can then discuss where we went wrong instead of why we think we are right).
 
I do hear what you are saying Soma, I really do. I disagree with most of it, but not all. Your position is very post-modern - that we can all have our truth and all be right. The problem is that in rejecting God-given authorities in our lives to teach and explain the Word of God, allowing for only/mostly personal interpretation, anyone and everyone can claim to come to the truth about any doctrine but be at polar opposites from everyone else. But that simply cannot be true.

Yes but WHICH authorities Free?

That is the problem.

I am not saying that one cannot at all trust their own interpretation or try to come to an understanding of Scripture on their own, but it should align with what has been historically and traditionally taught within the Church (within reason of course). As I have said several times in the past, if there is no orthodoxy, no correct belief, or practice for that matter, then we may as well all pack it in as any and very interpretation could be correct.

Here is where we differ.....

This is the kind of mentality that many would have said to Martin Luther and other reformers of his day....

Look Luther.... Just trust the Pope and the history of this Holy Spirit filled Church! There is no need to rattle the cages and revolt against the history and tradition of the Church...etc. ect.

If that was the case then there would have been no "reformation" and the subsequent denominations you see today.

Remember, each of the movements you mentioned above all started with personal interpretation. And I am sure you would agree that they all cannot be correct.

When I look at this painting and say it is a dove am I correct?

Or are you correct when you say it is an eagle?

When I read the scriptures and say to find the Holy Spirit through personal meditations am I correct?

Or are you correct when you say to find it through exoteric orthodoxy?

http://www.dancingshakina.com/eagle-dove-tap_exp.jpg

But instead you propose that we all quickly get our Wigrams. What is the difference?

Dude you and I both know that the Wigrams is a GREAT addition to any seekers library.

It goes to the ROOT language instead of the translations!

That cannot be bad!

I certainly don't think that one's salvation rests on knowing the original languages, but I am not so certain that one can get very far beyond the "milk" without either knowing Greek and Hebrew or being taught by someone who does

Good point.

If I had the time.....

It would be great to learn from a bona fide scholar on this.

I will remember that and, God willing, we will do that, whether in this life or the next (I would prefer the next just so that we can then discuss where we went wrong instead of why we think we are right).

Yes I wouldnt mind being wrong as long as I get out of this mire of confusion.

Well said![/i]
 
Soma-Sight said:
Yes but WHICH authorities Free?

That is the problem.
Eph 4:11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers,
Eph 4:12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ,
Eph 4:13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ,
Eph 4:14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes.

Notice how even the knowledge of the Son of God comes through those offices listed in verse 11.

Soma-Sight said:
This is the kind of mentality that many would have said to Martin Luther and other reformers of his day....

Look Luther.... Just trust the Pope and the history of this Holy Spirit filled Church! There is no need to rattle the cages and revolt against the history and tradition of the Church...etc. ect.

If that was the case then there would have been no "reformation" and the subsequent denominations you see today.
This is why I was careful to say that an interpretation must align within reason. Luther certainly recognized some of the corrupt and erroneous teachings of the Church and the need for reformation, but he most certainly agreed for the need for orthodoxy and likely agreed with much of the Church's doctrine.

The need for orthodoxy and that there is right belief which sets itself against error is clearly shown in Scripture. I am not ruling out one's personal searching for interpretation at all, we are exhorted to do that as well. But one must be so careful when seeking to interpret Scripture and this is the reason why many get degrees to help them to do it better. There is a large volume of doctrine which is consistent from denomination to denomination which defines orthodoxy and those who reject certain aspects of it are in danger of heresy.

Soma-Sight said:
When I read the scriptures and say to find the Holy Spirit through personal meditations am I correct?

Or are you correct when you say to find it through exoteric orthodoxy?
You are touching on a grave danger with spirituality. If one's doctrine does not line up with orthodox Christianity, that chances are huge that their spirituality, no matter how sincere, can lead them astray. If one thinks they are following Christ, according to their own interpretation of Scripture which differs from the orthodox interpretation, then they do not have the Holy Spirit and cannot find Him through personal meditations.

Wrong belief leads to wrong practice.

Soma-Sight said:
Dude you and I both know that the Wigrams is a GREAT addition to any seekers library.

It goes to the ROOT language instead of the translations!

That cannot be bad!
Actually, I never heard of Wigrams until you posted it. The problem I find with stating that only one Bible dictionary is correct since it goes to the root languages, is that many words in other languages don't translate directly to English (or any other language) and they can have multiple meanings depending on the context that it is used in.

I do believe that most/all Bible dictionaries and lexicons do their best to get to the real meaning of what each word states in the context in which it is used. Having said that, there are some that are better than others.

Soma-Sight said:
Yes I wouldnt mind being wrong as long as I get out of this mire of confusion.
If I'm wrong, I really want to know. And trust me, I understand the confusion.
 
Back
Top