• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

[__ Science __ ] Ice Cores—The Secret to Understanding Earth’s Climate?

AIG.com

Answers In Genesis
RSS Feed
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
1,752
Reaction score
450
How polar ice sheets developed after the global flood and why ice cores don’t tell us how to address climate change.

Continue reading...
 
How polar ice sheets developed after the global flood and why ice cores don’t tell us how to address climate change.

Continue reading...
This article doesn't convince me (I'm a skeptic) that ice cores are not dated properly, and that scientists cannot accurately obtain gas content. I do understand that assumptions will affect the interpretation of data. I also understand that the AIG explanation of the ice layers seems valid on the surface, yet it too requires assumptions. The devil is in the details - in order to convince me one way or another, I will need to see a debate on exactly how the layers are dated according to each method of interpretation, and how exactly AIG can explain the error of conventional dating that shows correlation with volcanic activity in the known and documented past. It appears that a single article assuming the standard assumptions won't bear this out. If you can attach a link to such a debate, I would appreciate it.
TD:)
 
Back
Top