S
Soma-Sight
Guest
Is porn a spiritual epidemic regardless of belief system?
Is it an epidemic in the Christian comunity?
Is it an epidemic in the Christian comunity?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
It is a substitute, and probably close when considering the condition of many marriages, but of course not all. :-DIt must be a somewhat close substitute for these failures.
ThinkerMan said:Epidemic means something new and spreading rapidly (as we usually use it). Erotica is nothing new.
Technology gave society the means for it to be widespread. While I don't deny taking a peek or two or three myself, the internet has certainly opened up a whole new world. As has the alcohol industry. Everything in moderation, they say.
It's interesting to note that one of the first, if not the first, movies ever made two centuries ago as "The Kiss" which raised a lot of eyebrows. Porn followed very, very quickly after the inventions of photography and movies.
Erotica has been around for thousands of years, but certainly not in the expanse and ease of access and privacy it is now. Many claim the reason why we even have VCRs (and DVDs) today is because of porn. They were the harbingers of a larger cultural change.
Personally, I see it more as a sign of the times of technology than any moral degredation.
antitox said:ThinkerMan said:Epidemic means something new and spreading rapidly (as we usually use it). Erotica is nothing new.
Of course it's not new. And evil has been around since the earth began too.
antitox said:Technology gave society the means for it to be widespread. While I don't deny taking a peek or two or three myself, the internet has certainly opened up a whole new world. As has the alcohol industry. Everything in moderation, they say.
How do you justify in "moderation" when people get addicted to it? All they have to do is try it and they're hooked.
antitox said:It's interesting to note that one of the first, if not the first, movies ever made two centuries ago as "The Kiss" which raised a lot of eyebrows. Porn followed very, very quickly after the inventions of photography and movies.
Erotica has been around for thousands of years, but certainly not in the expanse and ease of access and privacy it is now. Many claim the reason why we even have VCRs (and DVDs) today is because of porn. They were the harbingers of a larger cultural change.
Personally, I see it more as a sign of the times of technology than any moral degredation.
Of course, because atheists reason away morals and anything associated with absolutes. :-?
ThinkerMan said:Not at all. However, I believe that not all morality can be defined in as clear gradiations of black and white as you do. I do believe that grey areas exist.
Porn can be harmful, both for the young girls that get trapped into it as well as how it can potentially disrupt someone's life or relationships. However, I don't find it de facto immoral. Many couples enjoy pornography together. For many it allows a fantasy outlet that may stem other urges (i.e. adultery).
I am similarly concerned, however, with its prevalence and the access that young kids have to it. I'm only thirty, and I remember the days when one of my buddies sneaked his dad's Playboy was access. Now it's in popups and innocent google searches. I think THAT is the problem, not the mere existance of pornography in general.
Quath said:I think you have to see porn in shades of grey. Muslims may see a naked face as pornography. Some may see a naked statue as porn. Some may see Shakespeare stories as porn.
Is a picture of a naked baby in a bathtub porn? In a family album people would probably say no. On a pedophilia website, people would probably say yes.
Is a woman just wearing a bra and panties pornography? Maybe not if she is in the Sears catalogue.
So without a solid defining line of pornography, it is hard to draw a hard defining line on what to do about it.
Quath
Do you disagree or agree?antitox said:Well gee Quath, I guess that means porn just doesn't exist except in our minds, right? You bring relativism to new heights. :-?
[/quote:3f1b6]Quath said:antitox said:Do you disagree or agree?
When do we agree?
Is a man looking at a naked lady looking at porn? What if she is spread legged and showing everything? Does it matter if it is a college kid at an adult club or a gynocologist doing a pap smear?
Application Quath. One thing is for the purpose of health, the other is for immoral gratification; something you don't understand -locked into your relative-tweaked mindset.
[quote:3f1b6]Porn to one person is not porn to another. It is like what bibleberean said. He knows what porn is to him, but he can not define it objectively. It is relative.
Quath