Justification

[thessalonian]

Re: This Thread Is About Roman Catholic Propaganda At Best

Hi Thessalonian:

Thessalonian >> I beg the indulgence of the moderators for the length of this post. It expresses my view of justification and sanctification in a most eloquent way. I believe there is a huge lack of understanding of my beliefs and so I post it. Please read. It is from:

Plastering miles of church dogma to this Board should be forbidden, as you can just as easily provide everyone a link if you cannot manage to write your own Opening Post on this topic. The entire work does not contain enough Scriptural support to prop up a case for anything. Karl Adam makes references to the “First Epistle of St. Clement†AD Cor. Xliv, 3†like that means something. Everything on that website from top to bottom is utterly useless for anything but forwarding RC propaganda that will put your eye out if not careful. I would like to comment on the man’s use of Scripture, but there is not enough here to fill a woman’s thimble. Clement indeed . . . That is funny . . .

In Christ Jesus,

Terral

Thanks for stopping by with your chat room response. I've written much on justification on this board and given much scripture to support my views. I simply posted this because he stated the Catholic view quite well. You don't ever quote anyone? Do you always chide people for quoting others?

 

[thessalonian]

No cj. I don't think most people on this board are fools. Only a few. You can post whatever you like. You've convinced me of nothing other than that you will continue to try and prevail against Christ's Church. Your intellect is truly dizzying.

 

[cj]

No cj. I don't think most people on this board are fools. Only a few.

That's your problem right there.

You can post whatever you like. You've convinced me of nothing other than that you will continue to try and prevail against Christ's Church.

And agin you prove the truth of what I said, your folly doctrine only serves the purpose of dividing with your erroneous belief that the apostate RC institution is "Christ's Church".

Your intellect is truly dizzying.

Better dizzying than given over to the work of God's adversary.


In love,
cj

 

[thessalonian]

Re: This Thread Is About Roman Catholic Propaganda At Best

.... Plastering miles of church dogma to this Board should be forbidden,...

Not in all cases Terral, for it is invigorating to excercise the spirit in contending for truth. And it is a good pattern to set for younger saints.

Stomping Satan has its place for sure,.... this being wherever he seeks to raise it up.


In love,
cj

Yes, instead this board should be about posting everyone's conflicting doctrine as if there is no one truth and one truth is as good as another. Or as if each one of you is right but it is not really important that other's conflict with you.

Mark 13

[21] And then if any one says to you, `Look, here is the Christ!' or `Look, there he is!' do not believe it.
[22] False Christs and false prophets will arise and show signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect.

 

[cj]

Re: This Thread Is About Roman Catholic Propaganda At Best

.... Plastering miles of church dogma to this Board should be forbidden,...

Not in all cases Terral, for it is invigorating to excercise the spirit in contending for truth. And it is a good pattern to set for younger saints.

Stomping Satan has its place for sure,.... this being wherever he seeks to raise it up.


In love,
cj

Yes, instead this board should be about posting everyone's conflicting doctrine as if there is no one truth and one truth is as good as another. Or as if each one of you is right but it is not really important that other's conflict with you.

Mark 13

[21] And then if any one says to you, `Look, here is the Christ!' or `Look, there he is!' do not believe it.
[22] False Christs and false prophets will arise and show signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect.

Thess, its wonderful that you present scripture verse rather than RC doctrine.

You speak about the matter of conflicting beliefs, yet, there is jsut one bible.

So lets stick to this one word of God.


Fact is, all over the text that you presented at the beginning of this board one can find things that are not according to scripture, meaning, things that have been added to the scriptures.


This is a fact, a RC follower cannot be an RC follower by sticking to scripture alone.

And this fact alone is what will immediately seperate you from me.

And, who has initiate this seperation?

Is it me or is it you?

It is you, for you have made the choice to receive something more than that which is found in God's word.


Thess, I am still standing on God's word only,... but you on the other hand have moved position and sought to stand on God's word... plus RC institute doctrine.


Come back to the ground of the pure word and you will find me standing there.


Paul said, "All in Asia had.... left.... him."

Meaning this, Paul was still standing on what he had always stood on, but those who were once with standing with him had chosen to move to some other ground.

Paul never moved, but most around him moved away from him.


Come back to where Paul was standing, and is still, in the faithful saints standing, come back to the only ground of oneness that there is for the Church.


You moved Thess, not me.


In love,
cj

 

[thessalonian]

Thess, its wonderful that you present scripture verse rather than RC doctrine.

It's not a rather than. One compliments the other. Now I shall place you and your personal tradition of man that nullifies the word of God on ignore.

 

[cj]

It's not a rather than. One compliments the other. Now I shall place you and your personal tradition of man that nullifies the word of God on ignore.

I guess that's better than handing me over to the inquisition.

Thanks.


In love,
cj