Don't know if "Kingdom theology" is the proper seminary term for the subject Drew and I have been discussing on another the One Word Government thread, but that at least sounds like a name for a version of it. So this thread is a continuation of some of Drew's rebuttals to me, instead of us hi-jacking the World Government thread.
But I did refer to the two sticks prophecy in Ezekiel 37, and it is VERY relevant to God's promise of re-establishing the seed of Israel (12 tribes) back to their original inheritances of the land in the middleast. What's your reason for not wanting to address it?
Maybe you'd benefit from a deeper study on that word Israel, to whom it was first given and why, and what it stood for involving God's promises to Jacob. And I'm not confused about that term Israel, but I think you might be.
Paul has only one Israel in mind not two, because he showed in Romans 9 that the Promised Salvation ALWAYS was about Faith, and not of the law, and not by flesh birth. In other words, even the flesh seed of Israel must receive Salvation only by Faith on The Savior, and not just by being a flesh born Israelite. There's no reason to turn that into two separate Israel concepts, just because he said they are not all Israel, which are of Israel. A concept like one is the fake, and the other one is true Israel would be more correct. The problem is understanding when the true Israel of God was first established, for it did not just begin when Paul wrote Romans 9. Nor did it begin with Christ's death on the cross. It began with God's promise to Abraham by Faith, which was always first before the law.
What I think you may not understand is what all God's promises to Abraham and his seed after him included. There is a reason why God is called The God of Abraham, The God of Isaac, and The God of Jacob. And it involves the new name God gave to Jacob, that of Israel.
Drew said:I am not referring to the two sticks prophecy. I have not studied that prophecy, but since it is clear, as per my argument of a recent post, that Paul does not think that ethnic Jews have been promised Israel, I can confidently say that whatever the "two sticks" stuff is about, it is not any kind of promise of the Land of Palestine to ethnic Jews beyond the time of the cross.
But I did refer to the two sticks prophecy in Ezekiel 37, and it is VERY relevant to God's promise of re-establishing the seed of Israel (12 tribes) back to their original inheritances of the land in the middleast. What's your reason for not wanting to address it?
Well, yes and no. I certainly agree that the "children of faith" are the "true Israel" and that this "true Israel" indeed still exists, and that there are indeed promises still out there for this true Israel. But, as I am sure you are aware, this "true Israel" is made up of both Jews and Gentiles, so we are not talking about promises still on the table for any kind of ethnic group, such as the genetic descendents of Jacob. And, for reasons I will not get into here, I think that Paul sees the “promise of Palestine to the ethnic Jews forever†as really being a promise of the entire cosmos to this “true Israel†we are talking about.
There seems to be some confusion about us regarding the use of the term “Israelâ€. Paul has 2 Israel’s in his mind – the conventional “ethnic Israel†as determined by being a descendent of the 12 son of Jacob, and this “true Israelâ€, whose membership is determined solely by faith.
Maybe you'd benefit from a deeper study on that word Israel, to whom it was first given and why, and what it stood for involving God's promises to Jacob. And I'm not confused about that term Israel, but I think you might be.
Paul has only one Israel in mind not two, because he showed in Romans 9 that the Promised Salvation ALWAYS was about Faith, and not of the law, and not by flesh birth. In other words, even the flesh seed of Israel must receive Salvation only by Faith on The Savior, and not just by being a flesh born Israelite. There's no reason to turn that into two separate Israel concepts, just because he said they are not all Israel, which are of Israel. A concept like one is the fake, and the other one is true Israel would be more correct. The problem is understanding when the true Israel of God was first established, for it did not just begin when Paul wrote Romans 9. Nor did it begin with Christ's death on the cross. It began with God's promise to Abraham by Faith, which was always first before the law.
What I think you may not understand is what all God's promises to Abraham and his seed after him included. There is a reason why God is called The God of Abraham, The God of Isaac, and The God of Jacob. And it involves the new name God gave to Jacob, that of Israel.