• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Kingdom theology?

veteran

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
0
Don't know if "Kingdom theology" is the proper seminary term for the subject Drew and I have been discussing on another the One Word Government thread, but that at least sounds like a name for a version of it. So this thread is a continuation of some of Drew's rebuttals to me, instead of us hi-jacking the World Government thread.

Drew said:
I am not referring to the two sticks prophecy. I have not studied that prophecy, but since it is clear, as per my argument of a recent post, that Paul does not think that ethnic Jews have been promised Israel, I can confidently say that whatever the "two sticks" stuff is about, it is not any kind of promise of the Land of Palestine to ethnic Jews beyond the time of the cross.

But I did refer to the two sticks prophecy in Ezekiel 37, and it is VERY relevant to God's promise of re-establishing the seed of Israel (12 tribes) back to their original inheritances of the land in the middleast. What's your reason for not wanting to address it?

Well, yes and no. I certainly agree that the "children of faith" are the "true Israel" and that this "true Israel" indeed still exists, and that there are indeed promises still out there for this true Israel. But, as I am sure you are aware, this "true Israel" is made up of both Jews and Gentiles, so we are not talking about promises still on the table for any kind of ethnic group, such as the genetic descendents of Jacob. And, for reasons I will not get into here, I think that Paul sees the “promise of Palestine to the ethnic Jews forever†as really being a promise of the entire cosmos to this “true Israel†we are talking about.

There seems to be some confusion about us regarding the use of the term “Israelâ€. Paul has 2 Israel’s in his mind – the conventional “ethnic Israel†as determined by being a descendent of the 12 son of Jacob, and this “true Israelâ€, whose membership is determined solely by faith.

Maybe you'd benefit from a deeper study on that word Israel, to whom it was first given and why, and what it stood for involving God's promises to Jacob. And I'm not confused about that term Israel, but I think you might be.

Paul has only one Israel in mind not two, because he showed in Romans 9 that the Promised Salvation ALWAYS was about Faith, and not of the law, and not by flesh birth. In other words, even the flesh seed of Israel must receive Salvation only by Faith on The Savior, and not just by being a flesh born Israelite. There's no reason to turn that into two separate Israel concepts, just because he said they are not all Israel, which are of Israel. A concept like one is the fake, and the other one is true Israel would be more correct. The problem is understanding when the true Israel of God was first established, for it did not just begin when Paul wrote Romans 9. Nor did it begin with Christ's death on the cross. It began with God's promise to Abraham by Faith, which was always first before the law.

What I think you may not understand is what all God's promises to Abraham and his seed after him included. There is a reason why God is called The God of Abraham, The God of Isaac, and The God of Jacob. And it involves the new name God gave to Jacob, that of Israel.
 
Drew said:
Well, yes and no. I certainly agree that the "children of faith" are the "true Israel" and that this "true Israel" indeed still exists, and that there are indeed promises still out there for this true Israel. But, as I am sure you are aware, this "true Israel" is made up of both Jews and Gentiles, so we are not talking about promises still on the table for any kind of ethnic group, such as the genetic descendents of Jacob. And, for reasons I will not get into here, I think that Paul sees the “promise of Palestine to the ethnic Jews forever†as really being a promise of the entire cosmos to this “true Israel†we are talking about.

Have you ever considered, what Christ's Salvation is going to be like when we are all changed to the "spiritual body" Paul taught of in 1 Cor.15? Do you believe that we all will be made to have the same image appearance in the Heavenly, not being able to distinguish each other apart?

Like Christ promised His Apotles they each will sit upon thrones judging over the twelve tribes of Israel, how will even they be distinguished in appearance in the Heavenly? Do you think it not possible that peoples in that time won't be distinguished from each other, that God will make us all look the same? If so, where is that kind of idea written in God's Word?

In Ezekiel 44 about the Just priests that serve Christ when the Ezekiel sanctuary is setup on earth, they are allowed to go to the 'dead' (spiritually dead), for the sake of father, mother, brother, sister, etc. That is for a time when we are all changed to the "spiritual body" Paul taught. How will those recognize their relatives in the Heavenly? How will we recognize our own relatives after the resurrection?

And Christ's Apostles which He called, which were all Israelites by birth, why did Christ only choose them and not also of other nations to sit upon those future 12 thrones of Israel? Why did The Gosepl first have to be offered to the seed of Israel, and not the nations first? And in Rev.21 about the New Jerusalem Holy City when It comes down to earth, why are there twelve gates there with the names of the twelve tribes of Israel written upon them?

So you see, there has always been a Salvation pattern for God's true Israel that was offered to His chosen of the seed of Israel first. And if the chosen seed of Israel includes a remnant that believed (which it's always had), then how can we say the seed of Israel is no longer important to God? Will the flesh seed of Israel today that has believed on Christ Jesus be turned into Gentiles? Of course not.
 
So let's go over some OT Scriptures that have yet to happen involving the seed of Israel...

Ezek 39:25-29
25 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Now will I bring again the captivity of Jacob, and have mercy upon the whole house of Israel, and will be jealous for My holy name;
26 After that they have borne their shame, and all their trespasses whereby they have trespassed against Me, when they dwelt safely in their land, and none made them afraid.
27 When I have brought them again from the people, and gathered them out of their enemies' lands, and am sanctified in them in the sight of many nations;
28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, Which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
29 Neither will I hide My face any more from them: for I have poured out My spirit upon the house of Israel, saith the Lord GOD.
(KJV)

Note that is specifically about the "house of Israel". After the split of Israel into two separate kingdoms per 1 Kings 11, who was that?

IKing 12:19-21
19 So Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this day.
20 And it came to pass, when all Israel heard that Jeroboam was come again, that they sent and called him unto the congregation, and made him king over all Israel: there was none that followed the house of David, but the tribe of Judah only.
21 And when Rehoboam was come to Jerusalem, he assembled all the house of Judah, with the tribe of Benjamin, an hundred and fourscore thousand chosen men, which were warriors, to fight against the house of Israel, to bring the kingdom again to Rehoboam the son of Solomon.
(KJV)

Continued Bible study in 1 Kings 12 forward shows the "house of Israel" (ten tribes) were taken captive to Assyria, while the "house of Judah" (Jews) remained in the lands of Israel. Josephus the Jewish historian said the ten tribes were still scattered abroad among the nations in his days, and were a great number of people. That's who the Ezekiel 39 "house of Israel" is about, the ten tribes.

They are gathered back to where by God's Hand? Back to the lands God originally promised to Israel. That means all... the house of Israel, and also all of Jacob (put for all 12 tribes of Israel). And note God says He will sanctify them in the sight of many nations. Believing Gentiles will be gathered with them, but that's not our Heavenly Father's particular point there. He intends to let all nations know that He chose the seed of Israel first, and that He is not going to lose those among Israel that have believed.

Hosea 1:10-11
10 Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, "Ye are not My people", there it shall be said unto them, "Ye are the sons of the living God."
11 Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel.
(KJV)

When God said they were "not My people" (lo ammi), that's when they were in the lands of Israel and He then cast them out, scattered them through the nations. In the same place He said "not My people" to them, He will eventually say to them, "Ye are the sons of the living God." Not only that, but declares on that day both the "house of Judah", and "the house of Israel", will be gathered together as one people again. In the original lands they left is where that "Ye are the sons of the living God" will be said to them.

Amos 9:9-15
9 For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth.
10 All the sinners of My people shall die by the sword, which say, The evil shall not overtake nor prevent us.
11 In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old:
12 That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen, which are called by My name, saith the LORD that doeth this.
13 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that the plowman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that soweth seed; and the mountains shall drop sweet wine, and all the hills shall melt.
14 And I will bring again the captivity of My people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them.
15 And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the LORD thy God.
(KJV)

That too is specific about the "house of Israel" (ten tribes), being brought back from where God scattered them out of all nations, to the lands first promised to their fathers, the same promise God gave to them through Abraham about inheriting the "whole land of Canaan". Raising up the tabernacle of David is a reference to the land of Israel having a KING once again, something today's nation state of Israel does not have.

Does this detract from God's Salvation promised to Gentile believers? No, not in any way. Instead, we can be assured if God does not do this re-establishing per these examples, then there would be no Salvation. That's how strong The LORD is with this particular Message about His Israel. Men's traditions can try to say this is up in the clouds somewhere off the earth, in outer space, or anywhere else other than in the middleast holy land, and it won't mean a thing, because that is what our Heavenly Father has ordained how His Salvation will be through His Son. It very much involves the re-establishing of His people Israel.

And among Israel the believing Gentiles will be gathered also. All that agrees 100% with what Apostle Paul taught in Ephesians 2 about believing Gentiles through Christ's blood being "made nigh" unto the "covenants of promise" and the "commonwealth of Israel". In other words, without those covenant promises to Israel, and the existence of that "commonwealth of Israel" in the future, we have no Salvation.
 
Drew said:
veteran wrote:
So why did you conviently omit all the Scripture evidence in Daniel that decalres Christ coming to knock the beast image down, and setting up an everlasting Kingdom conditional to the 70 weeks prophecy, i.e., the tribulation timing?

This begs the question. I suspect that you are mistaken about the “timing†of the 70 week prophecy. I admit that I have not studied that prophecy. I am also willing to bet the “tribulation†you refer to is something that has already taken place. But we do know one thing - through his invocation of Daniel 7 before Caiaphus, Jesus is claiming to be the Son of Man figure who gets enthroned as king over all the nations as of His resurrection. I have gone through that argument in some detail. You really need to attack my argument directly if you want to sustain your position. It is not adequate to refer to the 70 week prophecy as if your view that it is inconsistent with Jesus already being enthroned does not need to actually be defended.

I am quite confident that such an argument will not succeed because then we would have contradiction in the Scriptures. Jesus really cannot be misunderstood: He tells Caiaphus that he (Caiaphus) will live to see Jesus enthroned as king of all the world. Jesus knows Daniel 7 – He would not allude to it if He were not telling Caiaphus that He (Jesus) were not to be shortly enthroned as King of all the world. Let’s be clear – the Son of Man figure in Daniel 7 is clearly described as being enthroned over all the world.

OK, I don't think that is as difficult as one might think it is. Here's the Scripture I must assume Drew is speaking of, since I can't find where he referenced it from The Bible. There's another version in Luke 14:62.

Matt 26:59-64
59 Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put Him to death;
60 But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses,
61 And said, "This fellow said, 'I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days'".
62 And the high priest arose, and said unto him, "Answerest Thou nothing? what is it which these witness against Thee?"
63 But Jesus held His peace. And the high priest answered and said unto Him, "I adjure Thee by the living God, that Thou tell us whether Thou be the Christ, the Son of God."
64 Jesus saith unto him, "Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven."
(KJV)

I assume you (Drew) might be looking at the Greek words for "Hereafter" in verse 64, which points to a separation of time with apo, and arti, two Greek words used to render KJV "Hereafter". Lot of the 'Kingdom now' folks try to take advantage of adverbs like "shortly" (Rev.1:1), "at hand" (2 Thess.2:2, Rev.1:3), etc., to interpret that Christ's Kingdom and even His second coming happenned back in the days of His Apostles, instead of being set at a later time. But the meaning of "Hereafter" in Matthew 26:64 simply means 'from' and 'now' (2 words in the Greek). The two words together is similar how we use the word 'hereafter' in our English language, except it's emphatic, like "from this day forward".

We do know from other Scripture that our Lord Jesus soon after His Resurrection ascended to Heaven to the right hand of The Father. But even the time after His Resurrection Mary saw Him, and He told her not to touch Him, for He had not yet then ascended to The Father (John 20:17). That proves the point that "Hereafter" does not mean at that very moment, for even when Jesus said "Hereafter" to Caiaphas, Christ had yet to be crucified on the cross. Our Lord Jesus was of course talking about AFTER His Resurrection He would sit on the Right Hand of The Father.

So what about the part, "...and coming in the clouds of heaven" at the end of Matt.26:64?

1Thes 4:17
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
(KJV)

Apostle Paul said that Thessalonians verse sometime later after Christ's Ascension to The Father. What does that show? It makes a distinction between the time of Christ's Ascension, and His coming with the clouds of heaven.

Rev 1:7
7 Behold, He cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see Him, and they also which pierced Him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of Him. Even so, Amen.
(KJV)

Our Lord Jesus gave His Book of Revelation through His servant the Apostle John while John was captive on the Isle of Patmos, even still at a later time. The early Church fathers establish that time as being during the reign of Domitian, around 96 A.D. So already there is a period of something like 60 years after Christ's Ascension to The Father, and His coming with the clouds of heaven had still not happenned yet when John was at Patmos.

Note the part in bold of Rev.1:7, "and they also which pierced Him". That refers to even those like Caiaphas who had our Lord Jesus delivered up to be crucified. And note not only they that pierced Him are to see that, but "every eye" also. That establishes Christ's coming with the clouds as no private coming that Caiaphas would see. Even when our Lord Jesus appeared to His disciples after His Resurrection, it was still not that coming with the clouds of heaven, because again, John was given to write of that event as still future to his day while captive on the Isle of Patmos.

What of other Scripture about that event of Christ coming with the clouds of heaven? Is there any other Scripture evidences about it? Yes.

Matt 24:29-31
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And He shall send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
(KJV)

Notice our Lord Jesus links that time of His coming with the clouds of heaven with a specific timing, and specific events, i.e., "Immediately after the tribulation", and with sending His angels to gather His elect servants at the sound of a trumpet. There's another version of that in Mark 13...

Mark 13:25-27
25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall He send His angels, and shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.
(KJV)

Note a bit more information with that Mark 13:27 verse, involving the gathering of His saints "from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven." Where are His saints today? Those still alive are on this earth, showing that gathering has not happenned yet, for that's about the resurrection of the dead.

Can we just stop there with those other Scripture references linked to that event of Christ's coming with the clouds of heaven? Absolutely not, not if we really want the full Truth of it. Since Christ linked His coming with the clouds of heaven to the "four winds" subject, and sending His angels to gather His elect on earth, and those who sleep in Jesus from the heavenly, ONE MUST include ALL Scripture events that are tied with it. It would take me days... just to post all of it here. The worst thing to do though, is to stop looking at all the relevant Scripture to His coming with the clouds of heaven.

This will lead to the subject of the Rev.13 beast kingdom timing, the ten horns system Daniel was given to write of, the seven trumpets of Revelation and their associated events, especially the third last woe with the seventh or last trumpet that signals Christ's coming, the seven vials being poured out upon the wicked, and even the end of this earth age per Scripture in both the New Testament and Old Testament prophets.

Now with the Daniel 7:13-14 verses you posted before, I've already shown that must happen per the order given in the Book of Daniel regarding more of its directly related Scripture. Even going up a couple verses prior to what you quoted from Dan.7 gives a different time picture than what you proposed...

Dan 7:11-14
11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.
12 As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.
13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought Him near before Him.
14 And there was given Him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve Him: His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
(KJV)

That beast kingdom being slain and given to the burning flame is about the final end of ALL beast kingdoms on this earth. Then just a few verses later in the same Dan.7 chapter, we're given a bit more detail as to the order of the beast kingdom timing and the timing when the saints will possess the kingdom under Christ....

Dan 7:19-22
19 Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
20 And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.
21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
22 Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.
(KJV)

The fourth beast was pagan Rome (legs of iron). But note there's another that comes up after that among ten horns (ten kings), called the "little horn" of Dan.7:8. Back in Daniel 2 we're shown a final kingdom referred to with the feet of unmixed iron and clay, and that's specifically where Christ will strike at His coming to bring the whole beast image down, and then He sets up His everlasting Kingdom mentioned there (Dan.2:38-44). That's the last beast kingdom on earth, the one of the feet of iron mixed with clay, and is about the "little horn" time.

And per Dan.2, we know when Christ strikes the feet of unmixed iron and clay, the whole... beast image comes tumbling together, which includes breaking of the gold, the silver, the brass, the iron, and the clay (Dan.2:45). Notice that is 5 parts, not 4 parts to the beast image. And if all those are broken by Christ together when He strikes it feet, like the Daniel Scripture says, what does that mean what all the final beast kingdom of part iron and clay includes? It is to include ALL the previous beast kingdoms within it, subordinate to it.

This is also the picture in Revelation 13 & 17, for we are told the ten kings will have no power until the beast king arrives, and they will give their power to him (Rev.17:10-14). The picture is about ten kings (ten horns), and then another king, and beast king ("little horn") that arises among them, which is when they receive power, and also give it over to him. All those ten kings and that beast king ("little horn") are contemporary to each other.
.
 
Hey Veteran:

Edited

I'm going to hang out on the other thread, the ones with the youtube links.
 
Back
Top