Logic & Fallacies

[JM]

You have no basis for it, you deny the Scriptures, the power found there in.

I have done no such thing and I challenge you publically to show where I have "denied the Scriptures". It is time to call you to account for such claims - please show exactly where and how I have denied the Scriptures. And I would suggest that the reader will not necessarily equate "disagreeing with JM" as being the same as "denying the Scriptures".

False teachings like open theism....

I invite interested readers to scan the archives and judge for themselves whether your arguments against open theism were superior to mine that were in favour of it. One cannot simply declare a doctrine to be false - you have to actually make a case.

Do as Drew suggested and read the archives. You'll notice Drew asked me to do this before and I reponsed by quoting him.

As for open theism being false...a false doctrine is not defined by those who hold to false belief. We did a poll and open theism was voted to be false. Christianity has declared open theism false, here are a few links.

http://www.carm.org/open.htm
http://www.ondoctrine.com/2mac0103.htm
http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/a ... eason.html
http://www.fpcjackson.org/resources/apo ... duncan.htm
http://www.wrfnet.org/articles/printarticle.asp?ID=726
http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_ar ... Theism.htm
http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibr ... ce_of_God/
http://www.ondoctrine.com/20openth.htm
http://www.ondoctrine.com/2cra0001.htm
http://www.knoxseminary.org/Prospective ... rinter=yes
http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibr ... _Mistakes/

Drew, there really isn't a difference between you and the JW's, mormons, etc. You all claim to be within the pale of orthodoxy and you really are not. This thread is locked in accordance with rule #3 and the fact that this thread has been hijacked.

JM