• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Math game...

I think I understand now. Are you saying that 1-4-6 and 3-5-14 both follow the same rule, but have different starting points, sort of like 1-2-4 and 3-6-12 both follow the rule of always doubling the previous number, but they have different stating points and are not part of the same series?

The TOG​

Hmm I think you're onto something there TOG.
 
Yes. You said it better than I could, thank you.

Also - agua knows the rule. He didn't want to post it but sent a PM to me instead.
Care to guess a set of three?
 
heheh... want a MAJOR hint?
find one that I can say .FALSE. to
 
(1, 4, 4) is .FALSE :nod

I thought it would be. I see that Michael74 posted the rule I've been thinking. I was going to post a couple more series just to be sure. Is Michel's answer correct?

The TOG​
 
Yes, that's the rule.

This experiment (with multiple participants) didn't quite work as I expected but yes, that's it.
 
I hope you don't mind me borrowing you thread Sparrow I think we should continue the puzzlin'.

You are facing a death penalty and have the chance to escape alive by playing Russian roulette with Charles Manson ( or some notorious criminal ). A 6 shooter is loaded with 2 bullets in consecutive chambers and the barrel spun. Charles takes the first pull and gets a "click".

You are given the option of spinning the chamber or not before pulling the trigger.

What will you do and why ? tic tic tic.

( please show working )
 
I hope you don't mind me borrowing you thread Sparrow I think we should continue the puzzlin'.

You are facing a death penalty and have the chance to escape alive by playing Russian roulette with Charles Manson ( or some notorious criminal ). A 6 shooter is loaded with 2 bullets in consecutive chambers and the barrel spun. Charles takes the first pull and gets a "click".

You are given the option of spinning the chamber or not before pulling the trigger.

What will you do and why ? tic tic tic.

( please show working )

That's an interesting problem. I did the calculations and the answer wasn't what I expected. I'll let someone else try first before I post my answer.

The TOG​
 
I don't know this particular problem or the math but in Gaming Theory there is a principle that basically states, "Stay with the known."

So no, don't spin the chamber.
 
In the case of non consecutive chambers, it would make more sense to spin. 2 out of 6 chances with a spin, 2 out of 5 chances with no spin.

Ah, but the chambers are consecutive. That's a bit more complicated...
 
The 2nd round is eliminated as a possibility when the first chamber is shown to be empty (assuming the first round was not a dud).
 
This leaves 3 empty chambers plus one full chamber as possibilities. One out of 4 chance of an empty with no spin, versus a 2 out of 6 chance with a spin?

In real life though, the weight of the rounds may prevent a completely random spin. Gravity acts on the rounds, potentially moving them toward the bottom, or maybe just beyond. I am not quite sure how to account for this possibility via modeling.

Of course, a clever prestidigitator might simply palm the rounds before spinning, and then reinsert them before passing over the revolver. So we must then ask if Chuck has any skills in that area. ;)
 
Back
Top