Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Are you receiving an "error" mesage when posting?

    Chances are it went through, so check before douible posting.

    We hope to have the situtaion resolved soon, and Happy Thanksgiving to those in the US!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Ever read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?

    Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject

    https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Names of Men on Bibles - Is it wrong?

Is it wrong to have a name such as King James on a Bible

  • It is wrong. It is a form of idolatry

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It is fine. Giving honor to men who have honored God is good.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's good to be King.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
T

thessalonian

Guest
On the Protestant side of things we have the King James Bible, Websters, Young's, Darby, Tyndale, etc..
On the Catholic side we have the Ignatius Bible.

Is it wrong to put a man's name on the cover of God's holy word?
 
By the way, I've read the King James burned women he thought were witches. :o
 
You know, this certain group screams and cackles about the Council called by a king- Constantine- but records the name of another king (whom they embrace as a hero and 'born again' even though he was clearly a profligate bisexual and murderer) on their bible covers.

Bizarro world.
 
This would be an interesting poll if people would vote. So far 40 hits and 1 vote. I should have added a couple options. i.e. It's okay but be very careful who's name is put on the cover, and The Bible forbids it. It is nowhere said in the Bible that a man's name should be on the cover. :o

I'm betting noone will take the consistent Protestant postion and condemn it as idolatry.
 
What :o no Wycliffe? You mentioned Tyndale and it is a known fact he was inspired to translate the Bible into English by Wycliffe. You didn't mention Wycliffe. Probably because his Bible predates the Reformation by over 100 years. 8-)


;-)

I don't care who's name is on the cover of a Bible. I care mostly about what's inside the covers.
 
Vic said:
What :o no Wycliffe? You mentioned Tyndale and it is a known fact he was inspired to translate the Bible into English by Wycliffe. You didn't mention Wycliffe. Probably because his Bible predates the Reformation by over 100 years. 8-)


;-)

I don't care who's name is on the cover of a Bible. I care mostly about what's inside the covers.

Wretched man that I am. I beg your appology for this slight of one who is apparently your idol. :)
 
so then, should we remove this book was written by Moses, and stuff? You answer me on that one. It is simple the writer, or person who inteprets., I dont tink about it, I simply think its the VERSIOn of the Bible.
 
Julian Pyke said:
so then, should we remove this book was written by Moses, and stuff? You answer me on that one. It is simple the writer, or person who inteprets., I dont tink about it, I simply think its the VERSIOn of the Bible.

Are you asking me? Hey, I'm not the one with the hyperliteral point of view about honoring men. You can't tell me it does not honor King James legacy to have his name on the cover of the Bible? You do raise a good point about Matt, Mark, Luke, and John. I don't know of any books named Moses. I know you don't think about it and many Protestants who tell Catholics they worship Mary and the saints don't either. If we mention them it's idolatry.
 
Gary said:
Thessalonian said:

Good advise.

:D
Yes, attack Catholicism and simultaneously ignore and avoid culpability and accountability for your own questionable practices.

Stick to the talking points.
 
Vic said:
I don't care who's name is on the cover of a Bible. I care mostly about what's inside the covers.

I agree, and in doing so, I think some, not all, comentary needs to be weighed with the same consideration as the name found on the outside...regardless of who the translation is accredited to.

Of course, this comment will be twisted and distorted to say things which I have not said let alone alluded to. It will be interesting how others will respond, as surely what come out of the mouth, is an overflow of what's in the heart.
 
StoveBolts said:
Vic said:
I don't care who's name is on the cover of a Bible. I care mostly about what's inside the covers.

I agree, and in doing so, I think some, not all, comentary needs to be weighed with the same consideration as the name found on the outside...regardless of who the translation is accredited to.

Of course, this comment will be twisted and distorted to say things which I have not said let alone alluded to. It will be interesting how others will respond, as surely what come out of the mouth, is an overflow of what's in the heart.

Stove,

I agree that the most important thing is what is on the inside of the cover. What motivates the thread is the continual bashing of Catholicism and Orthodoxy over honoring saints lives. This thread is actually a spinoff from the "why don't you cary around statues of Paul" thread. Logical question, why do they have names of men on Bibles? Most certainly it was done at the time of publication in order to honor King James who made it happen. He was even still alive when it was published. I have no problem with it myself (though I do have problems with the KJV, but that's a side issue). It's a hypocrysy issue.

If I have twisted anything you said please forgive me.
 
You have not offended me nor twisted anything I have written Thess. And yes, I do know what this was a spin off of.

Peace be with you all and may the Peace and Glory of our Father bless you through the grace given through Jesus the Christ.
 
Thessalonian said:
... Wretched man that I am. I beg your appology for this slight of one who is apparently your idol. :)
I will condede, you are wretched. :P Neither Tyndale nor Wycliffe are my idols though. 8-)
 
I don't generally read the cover much. Mostly, I'm concerned with what's inside. You can call it guacamole for all I care. But is it an accurate translation of the original text?
 
kwag_myers said:
I don't generally read the cover much. Mostly, I'm concerned with what's inside. You can call it guacamole for all I care. But is it an accurate translation of the original text?

But this is about what's inside is the point you are missing. Some claim the Bible allows us to only think about Jesus. One poster chided the Catholic perspective, quoting "noone is good except God" so we shouldn't honor men. Well if that is the case it most definitely is honoring a man, a king even to have his name on the cover of God's Holy Word. I see the radical literalists on this issue are avoiding the thread.
 
Thessalonian said:
... What motivates the thread is the continual bashing of Catholicism and Orthodoxy over honoring saints lives. This thread is actually a spinoff from the "why don't you cary around statues of Paul" thread. Logical question, why do they have names of men on Bibles? ...
I don't see the logic, nor the connection. I don't believe anyone here worships or even prays to King James, Tyndale, Young or any of the other names you mentioned.
 
Vic said:
Thessalonian said:
... What motivates the thread is the continual bashing of Catholicism and Orthodoxy over honoring saints lives. This thread is actually a spinoff from the "why don't you cary around statues of Paul" thread. Logical question, why do they have names of men on Bibles? ...
I don't see the logic, nor the connection. I don't believe anyone here worships or even prays to King James, Tyndale, Young or any of the other names you mentioned.

The matter is about honoring men. Some extermists on this board will say we give no honor to any man. That titles are wrong. This discussion came up on the call no man father threads over the last couple of days. People have said it detracts from Jesus to give honor to men. Comments have been made that only God is good so we shouldn't be honoring men. You don't pray to them, that is true but we are criticized for even mentioning them. If we speak of Paul or Mary or Peter we are worshipping them and neglecting Christ. I don't see you as one of these extremists.
 
Oy vay!

The things we quibble about! :roll:

The Bible's name or title of a person merely reflects the type of version that it was. King James spearheaded the translation into the version that it is, different in tone and structure. It is HIS version of the Bible....hence the name which reflects the type of Bible it is.

It is not worshipping anyone, nor is it blasphemous.

This has nothing to do with 'carrying around statues of Mary or Paul'. The issues are different, Thessalonian and I think this thread is a waste of time and words.

How picky do you really need to get?? For what purpose or reason?
 
Back
Top