S
SyntaxVorlon
Guest
What exactly is a miracle? I'm curious to find out what the common view is in this day and age, and I came across an interesting passage in Spinoza:
I find this passage interesting in that it speaks very clearly to sola scriptura religion yet is at the same time attempting to bring a sort of pantheism into the mix by combining God and Nature.
Baruch de Espinoza said:For the common people suppose that God's power and providence are most clearly displayed when some unusual event occurs in Nature contrary to their habitual beliefs concerning Nature, particularly if such an event is to their profit or advantage. They consider that the clearest possible evidence of God's existence is provided when Nature deviates-- as they think-- from her proper order. Therefore they believe that all those who explain phenomena and miracles through natural causes, or who strive to understand them so, are doing away with God, or at least God's providence. They consider that God is inactive all the while that Nature pursues her normal course, and, conversely, that Nature's power and natural causes are suspended as long as God is acting. Thus they imagine that there are two powers quite distinct from each other, the power of God and the power of Nature, though the latter is determined in a definite way by God, or as is the prevailing opinion nowadays, created by God. What they mean by the two powers, and what by God and Nature, they have no idea, except that they imagine God's power to to be like that of some royal potentate, and Nature's power to be a kind of force and energy.
I find this passage interesting in that it speaks very clearly to sola scriptura religion yet is at the same time attempting to bring a sort of pantheism into the mix by combining God and Nature.