K
King James
Guest
There is more than one problem with KJV onlyism. For this thread, I just want to focus on one problem. Since there are no editor's notes in the 1769 Oxford KJV that we buy and read today, people give the KJV a false authority that the original translators did not intend in 1611. The only way you can get these original notes in a KJV today is to buy a facsimile. The issue with this is the text is difficult to read(the more you know the bible, the easier it is it read this version FYI).
For those that aren't familiar with the 1611 version, here is an online version:
http://sceti.library.upenn.edu/sceti/printedbooksNew/index.cfm?TextID=kjbible&PagePosition=77
Here is all of the original editor's notes of the KJV:
http://en.literaturabautista.com/exhaustive-listing-marginal-notes-1611-edition-king-james-bible
For those that aren't familiar with the 1611 version, here is an online version:
http://sceti.library.upenn.edu/sceti/printedbooksNew/index.cfm?TextID=kjbible&PagePosition=77
Here is all of the original editor's notes of the KJV:
http://en.literaturabautista.com/exhaustive-listing-marginal-notes-1611-edition-king-james-bible