tim-from-pa
Member
Well, well! I could have said that long ago! I had the bible to back me up on that! But who believes an old out-dated book full of fables? 2
And the old school of medical thought (of which I am somewhat attached to as being a lot wiser) also said this a long time ago. Just ask my 85-year-old mom who was a nurse why she had that done to us boys --- she'd say the same thing: health benefits. It seems to be this newer, Liberal line of thought that became Gentilized and all of a sudden were wiser and recommended that boys would not have this procedure. And believe me, ladies prefer the C-type boys! (it saves on their olfactory experience) On the same line of thought, soon we'll be back to "under 300 is OK" again for cholesterol and 120/80 will once again be textbook BP instead of "pre hypertension". Geeeez.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_...outweigh-risks-amid-u.s-decline-in-procedure/
And the old school of medical thought (of which I am somewhat attached to as being a lot wiser) also said this a long time ago. Just ask my 85-year-old mom who was a nurse why she had that done to us boys --- she'd say the same thing: health benefits. It seems to be this newer, Liberal line of thought that became Gentilized and all of a sudden were wiser and recommended that boys would not have this procedure. And believe me, ladies prefer the C-type boys! (it saves on their olfactory experience) On the same line of thought, soon we'll be back to "under 300 is OK" again for cholesterol and 120/80 will once again be textbook BP instead of "pre hypertension". Geeeez.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_...outweigh-risks-amid-u.s-decline-in-procedure/