Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Hey Barb,
I don't see no rainbow.Hey Barb,
I love your photography.
I'll be seeing you here instead of in Politics.
It's better...
It's trick photography!!I don't see no rainbow.
You making stuff up?
Lol, maybe I don't have your illness.It's trick photography!!
You really can't see it?
Try again - you can do this.
I don't know about a lot.Lol, maybe I don't have your illness.
Maybe you and barbs have a lot in common.
That doesn't even look like real water falling.
Where's the source?
You're not too old if you're doing it!No, it's quite real, not processed in. These falls, at the right time of day, produce a rainbow.
Slow shutter speed.
The source:
And yes, I'm too old to be doing this kind of thing.
So I'm right, they're fake!You're not too old if you're doing it!
Slow shutter speed.
Oh, the memories...
A slow shutter speed does not make a waterfall be fake.So I'm right, they're fake!
I don't know about a lot.
But definitely photography.
Except he kept going and I stopped many years ago.
My first "serious camera:"
Built like a tank, and versatile as a jeep. I don't think I've ever seen a broken one. Cheap, but infallibly functional. On a wrist strap, it could be a formidable weapon when doing street photography in questionable neighborhoods; the square edges and a massive metal/bakelite body could do serious harm without damage to the camera.
Funny thing, although I'm in awe of my digital cameras and their capabilities, I don't really love them the way I love this one. I learned the basics on a meterless brick, and it will always have a fond place in my heart.
I agree regarding the digital. It's not the same.My first "serious camera:"
Built like a tank, and versatile as a jeep. I don't think I've ever seen a broken one. Cheap, but infallibly functional. On a wrist strap, it could be a formidable weapon when doing street photography in questionable neighborhoods; the square edges and a massive metal/bakelite body could do serious harm without damage to the camera.
Funny thing, although I'm in awe of my digital cameras and their capabilities, I don't really love them the way I love this one. I learned the basics on a meterless brick, and it will always have a fond place in my heart.
How come you don't?This was something like my first camera.
A poloroid from the 60's.
I wish I still had it.
I believe it!Minolta was a good reliable camera. The only Minolta I've ever owned was the 110 SLR, an odd little thing that never really caught on.
A poloroid from the 60's.
I wish I still had it.