[__ Science __ ] Rare Evolution in Action Spotted in Island Bats

AIG.com

Answers In Genesis
RSS Feed
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
1,872
Reaction score
472
A recent news article sported the bold claim that evolution in action was recently observed in island bats.

Continue reading...
 
Now, is this really an example of evolution in action?

Yes. The writer seems confused as to what biological evolution is. It is a change in allele frequencies in a population. To be macroevolution, it would require the evolution of a new species. Which is what seems to have happened here.
 
AIG is destroying the Athiest Myth. Not touching on CAFPT or speciation; AIG knows already CAFPT and Speciation are true.

Your wrong - Macroevo is NOT speciation.
You have a different definition, obviously.


Macroevolution


Evolution on a scale at or above the level of species
Macroevolution usually means the evolution of large-scale structures and traits that go significantly beyond the intraspecific variation found in microevolution. In other words, macroevolution is the evolution of taxa above the species level. Macroevolution is often thought to require the evolution of completely new structures such as entirely new organs. Wikipedia

WikiP. is a very pro athiest pro democrat pro Bioevo source. AntiCreation viewpoint.


Sorry, but CAFPT will never get an animal population to give rise to any quantity of an animal population - or individual - of a different family-level taxa.
 
A recent news article sported the bold claim that evolution in action was recently observed in island bats.
Did any news articles ever tell the truth that there was no evolution in the island bats nor anywhere ?
 
Did any news articles ever tell the truth that there was no evolution in the island bats nor anywhere ?
Given that most news is infested with secularism, doubtful.
Perhaps Creationist (aka Genesis believing) news would tell it.
 
Given that most news is infested with secularism, doubtful.
Perhaps Creationist (aka Genesis believing) news would tell it.
Is it possible even, for a forum in the usa, to use TRUTH as THE STANDARD, and to forbid lies, and to ban those who propagate lies even after warned ?
 
AIG is destroying the Athiest Myth. Not touching on CAFPT or speciation; AIG knows already CAFPT and Speciation are true.
They've retreated farther than that. They now admit the evolution of new genera, and in some cases, families. Would you like me to show you?
Your wrong - Macroevo is NOT speciation.
Well, let's take a look. From the Dictionary of Biology:

Macroevolution

Definition
noun, plural: macroevolutions
Evolution happening on a large scale, e.g. at or above the level of a species, over geologic time resulting in the divergence of taxonomic groups.


Your guys tried to redefine a scientific term, but scientists get to say what it means. Try to find a way to accept the reality.
 
The scientific definition of biological evolution, for those who were sleeping in biology class is:

"A change in allele frequency in a population over time."


Or before genetics, "descent with modification."

Again, evolution within a species is microevolution. Evolution that produces new species is macroevolution.
 
Since even AIG now admits the evolution of new species and even higher taxa, why not just accept it God's way?
 
Back
Top