Growth Reformed Recalcitrance

[netchaplain]

The Reformation regained the truth of the first Pauline revelation, namely, justification by faith alone (Sola fide—Latin: faith alone -NC), but did not go on to restore the truth contained in the second revelation (Eph 5:32). It is altogether possible that the problems attending the restoration of the first revelation, being so far-reaching and revolutionary as a reaction to the Romish perversions of truth, were all that could be undertaken at one time or by one generation.

Later studies of the NT developed the almost limitless theme of the second revelation. Unfortunately, however, theologians were unprepared to receive any added truth beyond that gained in the Reformation, and Protestant theology has, by a misguided loyalty to orthodoxy, never received the truth contained in Paul’s second revelation. It has been assumed that this added truth is dangerous if it was not included in the Reformation attainments and that it must be in conflict with those attainments.

Early in the history of Protestantism there were individual theologians who caught the first gleams of truth contained in the second revelation, and an ever increasing light has fallen on this body of truth until today where there is a great corps of students of doctrine who hold and teach, along with the first revelation, the clear unfoldings respecting the Church which is Christ’s body.

Nevertheless, orthodox Reformed theology persists in its original, isolated, and exclusive recognition of the first revelation, and continues to reject and condemn an intrusive as disruptive the great certified findings of those theologians who have given their years of study to the second revelation. This second revelation respecting the Church, if pursued worthily, leads with inexorable logic to dispensational and general distinctions of the Word of God.

Apart from all the misunderstandings and weaknesses of men, in which we all share to some extent, it yet remains true that in the eternal purpose of God (and made possible by the death, resurrection and ascension of Christ, and by the advent of the Spirit) a heavenly people are being called out for a specific heavenly glory, that this divine purpose is in no sense the realization of the promises and covenants made unto Israel, that every promise to Israel will yet be fulfilled, and that apart from these distinctions and anticipations there can be no harmonizing of the divine revelation.

The very fact that there has been such neglect of the whole field embraced in the second Pauline revelation becomes a challenge to the student of the Word to advance with greatest care in this all-but-limitless realm of truth. The fact that the Church is a mystery—with regard to the age of her out-calling, the truth that she is the body of Christ, the truth that she will be the Bride of Christ, and the manner of her departure from this world—indicates her distinctive character as separate from all that has gone before or that will follow.

The Apostle Paul writes: “Now to him that is of power to establish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ forever. Amen (Rom 16:25-27)

–L S Chafer

 

[Sparkey]

It sounds to me like L. S. Chafer was addressing, as the 2nd revelation, the reluctance on the part of the saints to truly act as members of the Body of Christ toward one another.

 

[netchaplain]

It sounds to me like L. S. Chafer was addressing, as the 2nd revelation, the reluctance on the part of the saints to truly act as members of the Body of Christ toward one another.

I believe you're partly correct, but it's not so much of reluctance as it is ignorance, because much of the light of God's Word concerning our increase in the "image of Christ" (spiritual growth) has been minimal due to the lack of sufficient knowledge of the Gospel fundamentals, which I believe is now waxing.

 

[Sparkey]

So the title, "Reformed Recalcitrance" was a misnomer?

 

[netchaplain]

So the title, "Reformed Recalcitrance" was a misnomer?

I understand your intention and my understanding is that many the early Church were resistant to spiritual growth truths mostly do to ignorance of its understanding.

I believe "the second revelation" the author refers to is the fact that the Christians (and only Christians) are the Body of Christ. This truth was not revealed until Christ did so through Paul. Jesus only mentioned it and eventually revealed it through Paul: "upon this rock (faith) I will build my church (Body of believers).

 

[Sparkey]

That makes sense to me too and i would agree with you that it wasn't so much unwillingness that was the problem but instead, and as you say, ignorance of the fullness of that particular promise. Frankly, I don't know what to make of it other than the magnanimous nature of God is so far beyond me that even stretching on the very tip of my tippy-toes, it is beyond my grasp. It has not even entered into the mind what God has prepared for them who love Him.

I do love watching what He, by His Spirit, does so much --and am again awestruck by what is being shown to me even today by the one who is Faithful. And then, when I pause to think about the "earnest of our inheritance" -- well, that's where the "I'm staggered, and You're awesome" part comes in.