Jethro Bodine
Member
- Oct 31, 2011
- 23,344
- 5,951
What do you think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Yeah, I'm confused. Arminians have a wild lifestyle and when mixed with Reformed it's produces an anythings OK?
Me either, that's why I say I am confused. I really didn't understand what he was saying.Yikes!
I don't think that's right.
I wasn't saying that is what reformed theology says. I saying I didn't understand what he was saying about what is being taught by young men and comparing it to Arminian mixed with Reformed. He lost me.Anyone who thinks that has never really studied reformed theology, much less the bible.
I wasn't saying that is what reformed theology says. I saying I didn't understand what he was saying about what is being taught by young men and comparing it to Arminian mixed with Reformed. He lost me.
Can you explain what he was saying. Thanks.
That's what I got from him too but I couldn't explain it.He seems to have a stunted view of Arminianism. The primary differences between Arminianism and Calvinism have to do with predestination and free will, and not much else. I don't see how he concludes that Arminianism will suck everyone into a complete acceptance of the values of the secular world. He just seems way off base, he seems to use the term Arminianism as a catch-all phrase for anything he doesn't like.
Lack of understanding and confusion? No, that's just me. :blushthis whole thread reads extremely forums normal to me...![]()
He says this in the video:
"How in the world could you have a true reformed view of the doctrines of grace as they relate to salvation and then think that having holes in your jeans and an Ambercrombie and Fitch t-shirt and a beer in you hand somehow give you access to the lost?"
What's he trying to say?
He seems to be quoting himself from 1967 when he put down Chuck Smith and Calvary Chapel.He says this in the video:
"How in the world could you have a true reformed view of the doctrines of grace as they relate to salvation and then think that having holes in your jeans and an Ambercrombie and Fitch t-shirt and a beer in you hand somehow give you access to the lost?"
What's he trying to say?
Is he saying that just because you have a true reformed theology regarding God's grace in salvation that somehow makes it okay to live loosely--that somehow your doctrine alone gives you legitimate spiritual authority to reach unbelievers and the rest doesn't matter? I think he's saying, 'no'. Reaching the lost isn't just about having a correct doctrine of salvation. I would tend to agree with him if he's saying that.He says this in the video:
"How in the world could you have a true reformed view of the doctrines of grace as they relate to salvation and then think that having holes in your jeans and an Ambercrombie and Fitch t-shirt and a beer in you hand somehow give you access to the lost?"
What's he trying to say?
I would want to know what he found wrong with Chuck Smith before I decide if he's out of line.He seems to be quoting himself from 1967 when he put down Chuck Smith and Calvary Chapel.
Nothing new here.
He has been at the center of controversy his whole life so he has learned not to say anything when he speaks.
He seems to be relating theology to how the generation presently in power lives in order to make the gospel culturally relevant and attractive to the world. I'm not convinced the theology is the issue as much as what techniques these guys use to communicate the gospel is.I'm not sure what he's trying to say, and that's why I've alluded to the fact that I think he's just ranting.
Maybe he's talking about election, grace and salvation is not available to everyone regardless of faith and works in Calvinist theology. Arminianism hold that grace is available to EVERYONE, which we have free will to accept or reject.
He seems to be blaming Arminians for the corruption of the gospel of grace.He seems to be relating theology to how the generation presently in power lives in order to make the gospel culturally relevant and attractive to the world. I'm not convinced the theology is the issue as much as what techniques these guys use to communicate the gospel is.