Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
but if you really, look at it, aren't I paid to kill ?
Well now that we know that you were not linking "hit man" to the mafia it certainly clears things up.Wow I never thought of it that way, as far as being evil. And I did not know that, that is what you were thinking that I meant. I have never felt like that, I am glad to have served and would have went to war for my country, but thinking that we were evil never ever crossed my mind until you said it. I still say though, we are paid hit men, now if you link that to the Mafia or something, it is going to sound maybe in some minds evil, because of what the stigma of the words hit man brings, by the civilian mind set. My thing is, in the time of war I am to serve my country and if I have to kill you I will and I am being paid at the same time to do so, I can serve my country and support my wife and kids at the same time. So I am not using the words Hit Men in a bad way, but if you really, look at it, aren't I paid to kill ?
I am not even going to answerNo..........51N is a Water Treatment Specialist.
The weapons you used in your training were to teach you how to defend yourself and your buddies in case your position was overrun by un-friendlies.
Unless you were a part of a specialized unit like the Seals or Delta Force, the training you received was for defensive purposes only.
You were not a paid killer.
.
he has a point. did you all go on patrols outside what you normally had to? ie rsop isn't what I call going after the enemy on search and destroy. I have been combat and now in a combat support mission. there is a difference. while the Mps can do the former they are labeled the later and train more for the later then the former.I am not even going to answer
I know the concept of everyman is an infantry man. I train in that too. but there is difference in training one day a year or a few weeks verses that is YOUR job.Jason he has no point and I am not really trying to hear this garbage. I was told by a officer in there that we are fighting soldiers first, everything else follows. So what are you and the others saying ? That I was a fake soldier or something. Because I don't agree with some of you and I am not going to agree with you. You and a couple others are going to down play my role as a soldier when I was in, I was not a grunt but I still had to keep training.
im speaking from experience, while the army does say that. to take a soldier that hasn't been trained longer then any basic recruit infantry will be a mistake without train up.And in the war working with your M-16 grenades and pistol with you at all times, and for what' to kill if you have to. I did not want to be a grunt, so I picked 51 November, the longest Mos that Fort Leonard Wood had at that time. And this is what I go by, everyman is an infantry man.
Jason he has no point and I am not really trying to hear this garbage. everything else follows. So what are you and the others saying ? That I was a fake soldier or something. Because I don't agree with some of you and I am not going to agree with you. You and a couple others are going to down play my role as a soldier when I was in, I was not a grunt but I still had to keep training.
I was told by a officer in there that we are fighting soldiers first,
Defend, what about seeking out the enemy ? I guess they don't do that anymore. Are you telling me that in war we don't seek out the enemy ? Like the bombing that we are doing now ?Lewis W , the only one downplaying your role as a soldier is you. You refer to yourself as a killer for pay, a hit man. Someone whose soul purpose is to kill someone for money.
How many people have you killed? If the answer is "0", then you were not being paid to kill.
Here's the oath you took. Notice it says "support and defend", not "seek out and kill".
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
That's true. Hence the marksmanship training. Regardless of ones MOS, you are trained to defend yourself.
No one's talking down to you Lewis W .
.
lewis, your job once the fob was built was to maintain the fob. not to go out the wire and take out the enemy.Defend, what about seeking out the enemy ? I guess they don't do that anymore. Are you telling me that in war we don't seek out the enemy ? Like the bombing that we are doing now ?
Defend, what about seeking out the enemy ? I guess they don't do that anymore. Are you telling me that in war we don't seek out the enemy ? Like the bombing that we are doing now ?
you nor I were there. I was trained by nam vets and until 2010. we had a sfc mess seargeant that wore his nam combat patch. to wit: americal. 23rd inf division. he was a grunt then.i have had a 1sg who was there as well and went to desert storm. those are the few that I can remember.It sure didn't go like that in Vietnam' I have talked to guy's who had to do whatever. And would seek them out to destroy them.